Notices
ES - 1st to 6th Gen (1990-2018) Forum for all 1990 - 2018 ES Models

2001 es300 interference or non-interference engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2018 | 06:30 AM
  #1  
rcpita's Avatar
rcpita
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Default 2001 es300 interference or non-interference engine

does the 2001 es300 have an interference or non-interference engine?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2018 | 07:11 AM
  #2  
PFB's Avatar
PFB
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 48
From: Montreal, Canada
Default

It's non-interference. If someone says otherwise they will be wrong
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2018 | 07:12 AM
  #3  
mcomer's Avatar
mcomer
Lead Lap
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,306
Likes: 1,230
From: IL
Default

go to https://www.gates.com/search-by-vehicle and enter the vehicle information.
I check yours and it does not seem to be an interference design.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2018 | 08:11 AM
  #4  
rcpita's Avatar
rcpita
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Default does the 2001 es300 have an interference or non-interference engine?

Thanks to PFB and mcomer for your reply. Lots of disagreements on this on other sites.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2018 | 11:23 AM
  #5  
crwys's Avatar
crwys
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 414
Likes: 30
From: California
Default

Regardless of whether it's interference or not, if you plan on driving the car till the belt snaps, you are still risking engine damage.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2018 | 05:18 AM
  #6  
rcpita's Avatar
rcpita
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Default Thanks

Thanks to crwys for your info. I was just curious because when I bought the car I was told it was non-interference and recently a mechanic told me it was an interference engine and I should change the belt soon, even though I changed it about 40,000 miles ago.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2018 | 06:16 AM
  #7  
RXGS's Avatar
RXGS
Lexus Test Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,627
Likes: 211
From: .
Default

I was told in 99 it became an interference motor due to the VVTI by both the Lexus dealer mechanic and the independent shop I use owned by a Toyota mechanic. Strange how years later we can’t defintiely have an answer.

One side of me says that the mechanics would of course say they are interfence to scare you into changing the belt, but I have seen several ESs and RXs that had snapped belts that required either extreme engine work or a whole new engine all together. Maybe check Toyota forums and see what they have to see as they are more active and have many more members.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2018 | 07:19 AM
  #8  
BDSL's Avatar
BDSL
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 15
From: Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by crwys
Regardless of whether it's interference or not, if you plan on driving the car till the belt snaps, you are still risking engine damage.
+1

And risking your life. If the belt snaps, the engine stalls, and the vehicle stops in the middle of the highway, you are risking your life.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2018 | 09:15 AM
  #9  
crwys's Avatar
crwys
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 414
Likes: 30
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by rcpita
Thanks to crwys for your info. I was just curious because when I bought the car I was told it was non-interference and recently a mechanic told me it was an interference engine and I should change the belt soon, even though I changed it about 40,000 miles ago.
No problem. As you can see there are still debates to this day that the engine is interface or non interface. I just avoid the debate now my stating you are risking engine damage either way, because you are.

I do find it really odd though that the mechanic wants the belt changed at only 40k miles. I believe the Lexus recommendation is 6 years or 90k miles, 120k for the water pump.
What I can also say is the chance of the belt breaking appears to be minimal, so after 90k or 6 years you can use your best judgment to decide how far you want to push it.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2018 | 11:07 AM
  #10  
gw204's Avatar
gw204
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 23
Likes: 2
From: MD
Default

My daughter's '00 is non-interference. Timing belt (the second or third one) let go at 201K. Shop replaced it, helicoiled threads for the tensioner or idle pulley and the car is now at 215K.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2021 | 02:19 AM
  #11  
Toyotarace's Avatar
Toyotarace
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Pa
Default

Originally Posted by PFB
It's non-interference. If someone says otherwise they will be wrong
They make a couple different 1mz-fe engines. Vvt are higher output which are for a fact interference engines while the non vvt are non interference engines so becareful who you listen to. There's always morons who think they know that are totally wrong.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OneGuyInCA
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
27
Oct 21, 2019 10:47 PM
davidber
ES - 1st to 6th Gen (1990-2018)
20
Oct 24, 2012 08:59 PM
DrivewayAl
ES - 1st to 6th Gen (1990-2018)
0
Aug 20, 2011 11:17 PM
jkb0076
ES - 1st to 6th Gen (1990-2018)
19
Aug 28, 2010 04:36 PM
fmaddin
ES - 1st to 6th Gen (1990-2018)
12
Feb 3, 2005 10:56 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:34 AM.