Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

The perfect engine for today’s small sedans and crossovers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-22, 10:43 AM
  #31  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,345
Received 2,032 Likes on 1,576 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
There's a little more nuance to it than this, but the simple math says if you can get 300hp out of a factory 3.5L NA V6, an engine of a similar design but half the displacement should give you somewhere in the neighborhood of 150hp. Let's be generous and say 180hp if you take advantage of the lower piston mass to make it rev out to 9k rpm or something like that, but then again that runs counter to the stated goals of the thread.
^^ This ^^
AMIRZA786 is online now  
Old 11-28-22, 10:48 AM
  #32  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,345
Received 2,032 Likes on 1,576 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
You have completely mislead with your argument. There were no 300HP I4 turbos back then. There are today, so it is very reasonable to assume there were could be 400 small 1.8 turbo I6s today. Toyota has a 300HP 3 banger. so it can be done. but it is pointless, it would cost too much and would not be worth it.
That 3 banger is a 1.6 turbocharged engine, and it's not quiet, it's tuned for performance, and we don't know how reliable it is long term (although it probably is reliable). It would not work for the purposes the OP is laying out, which is a small Sedan/Crossover. The 1.8L V6 would be more expensive to use (and for the customer) than an I4 used for the same purpose, so the argument was not missed because it's not the right engine for today. Both would have to use Forced induction to meet today's need, as the a 1.8L V6 is woefully underpowered

Last edited by AMIRZA786; 11-28-22 at 10:51 AM.
AMIRZA786 is online now  
Old 11-28-22, 10:58 AM
  #33  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,455
Received 2,679 Likes on 1,922 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
There's a little more nuance to it than this, but the simple math says if you can get 300hp out of a factory 3.5L NA V6, an engine of a similar design but half the displacement should give you somewhere in the neighborhood of 150hp. Let's be generous and say 180hp if you take advantage of the lower piston mass to make it rev out to 9k rpm or something like that, but then again that runs counter to the stated goals of the thread.
Exactly.

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
You have completely mislead with your argument. There were no 300HP I4 turbos back then. There are today, so it is very reasonable to assume there were could be 400 small 1.8 turbo I6s today. Toyota has a 300HP 3 banger. so it can be done. but it is pointless, it would cost too much and would not be worth it.
LOL, I do not "mislead". He said that engine was the perfect engine for todays small sedans and crossovers. You could achieve that with a TURBOCHARGED 1.8L V6 sure, but thats not what he's saying. He is saying that a small low powered naturally aspirated V6 would be preferable to a small turbo 4 cyl and I just completely disagree. Nobody wants to go back to 10+ second 0-60 times, and without forced induction or electrification there is only so much power you can get out of so much displacement.

There is also the issue of size. A small I4 is much more compact than a small V6 or I6, so there are packaging issues to take into account as well.

Originally Posted by mmarshall
One does not need 300 HP in the average subcompact sedan or crossover. However, with today’s powertrain engineering, a lot more than the 129/157 power figures for that original 1.8L V6 could easily be done with the same block…even without forced-induction.
You need way more than 150 hp, especially with the high power and torque curves in a NA engine. Case in point my cousins 2015 Nissan Rogue with 170 hp out of a NA 4 cyl, its PAINFULLY slow. A turbo 4 would make that vehicle like a whole other vehicle.

Powertrain engineering is not magic, when you are dealing with a naturally aspirated engine there is only so much power you can get out of so much displacement. To get competitive power you would have to turbocharge it and/or electrify it.

That old Mazda probably did 0-60 in 15+ seconds.

Last edited by SW17LS; 11-28-22 at 11:02 AM.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 11-28-22, 11:01 AM
  #34  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,683
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
LOL, I do not "mislead". He said that engine was the perfect engine for todays small sedans and crossovers. You could achieve that with a TURBOCHARGED 1.8L V6 sure, but thats not what he's saying. He is saying that a small low powered naturally aspirated V6 would be preferable to a small turbo 4 cyl and I just completely disagree. Nobody wants to go back to 10+ second 0-60 times.

.
You could get more than 200HP with the I6 if it were NA, not 170hp. You are comparing high end 300HP I4ts..you should be comparing smaller I4s or the I3s You mislead.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 11-28-22, 11:04 AM
  #35  
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Striker223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,612
Received 1,172 Likes on 873 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
So, would you take a 170 hp 1.5L V6 over a 300 hp turbo 4?
In this case the 6 would be more powerful if we are assuming same tech same displacement, more cylinders for a given displacement is always more power due to intake valve curtain area rules.

The best example of this if I might add is the ford 2.7 eco boost vs similar size 2.5L turbo engines. The V6 smacks them around

Last edited by Striker223; 11-28-22 at 11:09 AM.
Striker223 is online now  
Old 11-28-22, 11:05 AM
  #36  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,345
Received 2,032 Likes on 1,576 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
You could get more than 200HP with the I6 if it were NA, not 170hp. You are comparing high end 300HP I4ts..you should be comparing smaller I4s or the I3s You mislead.
Not a NA 1.8. Totally impossible without taking the engine to limits that would make it completely unreliable, and unliveable
AMIRZA786 is online now  
Old 11-28-22, 11:06 AM
  #37  
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Striker223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,612
Received 1,172 Likes on 873 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
I don't mean to bring EV's into this conversation, but one of the reasons I can't buy ICE anymore. I can't live with these tiny downsized turbocharged/hybridized engines. 3.0T or 3.5L NA and up, or I'm not interested. That 1.8 would put me to sleep. Disappointing times for ICE IMO
4.0L is small in my mind, anything under I don't consider a "real engine". I started with a 6.0 and it's hard to tolerate smaller engines unless they are effectively large via boost, a 4.0 with 14psi is an around a 6-8L engine.
Striker223 is online now  
Old 11-28-22, 11:06 AM
  #38  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,455
Received 2,679 Likes on 1,922 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
You could get more than 200HP with the I6 if it were NA. You are comparing high end 300HP I4ts. You mislead.
Its not an I6, its a V6, and I seriously doubt you could get more than 200 HP out of a 1.8L NA V6.

I do not mislead. Even if we are talking about a 250 hp turbo 4 its going to feel much more powerful and more responsive than a small displacement NA V6. If vehicle engineers thought that type of engine would provide the power and the fuel economy that they were targeting then thats what we would have. Perhaps I might prefer this to a NA 4 cyl, but not a turbocharged one.

You can disagree with me but don't make an accusation towards me like "I mislead". Thats ridiculous.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 11-28-22, 11:06 AM
  #39  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,345
Received 2,032 Likes on 1,576 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Striker223
In this case the 6 would be more powerful if we are assuming same tech same displacement, more cylinders for a given displacement is always more power due to intake valve curtain area rules.
He's talking about an NA, non forced induction 1.8L
AMIRZA786 is online now  
Old 11-28-22, 11:07 AM
  #40  
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Striker223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,612
Received 1,172 Likes on 873 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
Actually you can get 320HP out of an IS350 with an RR Racing tune, PPE headers and a bigger exhaust. The RR Racing tune brings the Redline up to 7200 RPM. PPE headers are not CARB compliant in California, so I was considering buying the tune, but it wasn't worth $600 just gain 14 hp
And it will still feel gutless under 4k rpm......meanwhile for $850 you can add 250-350 TQ at 1500 rpm to any German 4.0 engine
Striker223 is online now  
Old 11-28-22, 11:07 AM
  #41  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,455
Received 2,679 Likes on 1,922 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Striker223
In this case the 6 would be more powerful if we are assuming same tech same displacement, more cylinders for a given displacement is always more power due to intake valve curtain area rules.
We're not assuming the same tech, the small 6 is NA the 4 is turbocharged.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 11-28-22, 11:07 AM
  #42  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,345
Received 2,032 Likes on 1,576 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Striker223
4.0L is small in my mind, anything under I don't consider a "real engine". I started with a 6.0 and it's hard to tolerate smaller engines unless they are effectively large via boost, a 4.0 with 14psi is an around a 6-8L engine.
Were in total agreement here
AMIRZA786 is online now  
Old 11-28-22, 11:10 AM
  #43  
geko29
Super Moderator

 
geko29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 7,702
Received 274 Likes on 210 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
You could get more than 200HP with the I6 if it were NA, not 170hp. You are comparing high end 300HP I4ts..you should be comparing smaller I4s or the I3s You mislead.
How? The 2.5L V6 (from the IS250) referenced in this thread as a smoothness guideline only makes 204 hp. How do you remove 30% of the displacement, keep the same or greater power output, without making it thrashy or adding forced induction?
geko29 is offline  
Old 11-28-22, 11:10 AM
  #44  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,345
Received 2,032 Likes on 1,576 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Striker223
And it will still feel gutless under 4k rpm......meanwhile for $850 you can add 250-350 TQ at 1500 rpm to any German 4.0 engine
We are in total agreement here as well
AMIRZA786 is online now  
Old 11-28-22, 11:11 AM
  #45  
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Striker223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,612
Received 1,172 Likes on 873 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
Not a NA 1.8. Totally impossible without taking the engine to limits that would make it completely unreliable, and unliveable
Certified 9500 rpm redline with a high lift cam with NO power under 6k moment lol! Honda B18 time I guess lol!

Super reliable but they suck to drive unless you are willing to spin up to 5-7k at anytime you want to get moving.
Striker223 is online now  


Quick Reply: The perfect engine for today’s small sedans and crossovers?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:54 PM.