Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Hyundai moving away from hydrogen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 08:12 AM
  #16  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,460
Likes: 232
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I wouldn't quite use that term, but, if you insist, then I'll say Toyota should put up. Hydrogen, IMO, makes more sense than pure BEV....but only if an adequate network of hydrogen-refill stations can be built and supplied. BEVs are just not feasible for a lot of people. For my own personal needs (although obviously not the case with everyone) an extended-range hybrid with a small gas engine for recharging would probably be best...but GM doesn't offer that option with the Encore GX. Hopefully, it will.
Toyota has trashed BEV for many years at this point and pushed Hydrogen completely so I agree with you. They have a vision and should push it like Tesla did with BEV and take risks by offering multiple hydrogen based cars and actual choice for consumers. They should also drive the infrastructure with their own cash and have Toyota refueling stations if they truly believed in their vision. However, they haven't really taken a risk for many years now...the company is too risk averse. They just follow the market and can't even build their own dedicated sports car because they are too risk averse to go it alone in a market segment. Sad really.

I really respect Hyundai's bold decisions lately and they are reacting bravely to the transition to BEV. They are making decisions quickly and moving quickly compared to most in the industry.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 08:19 AM
  #17  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,823
Likes: 4,101
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
And, again, not everyone has (or needs) the facilities you have....single-family home with built-in recharging. Having said that, though, future government action may mandate built-in chargers in new homes (220-400 volts, not just 110), and/or retrofitting to existing ones where feasible.

We've also talked a lot on Car Chat about the future needs of the electric power-grid itself to recharge all these EVs (in addition to present and future needs), but precious little evidence (outside of talk) on just how that is going to be achieved. With more variable weather/climate, the system is going to be more taxed just keeping up with heating/AC needs at home, much less vehicles.
Its all gonna be fine lol
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 08:21 AM
  #18  
Och's Avatar
Och
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,035
Likes: 247
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
And, again, not everyone has (or needs) the facilities you have....single-family home with built-in recharging. Having said that, though, future government action may mandate built-in chargers in new homes (220-400 volts, not just 110), and/or retrofitting to existing ones where feasible.

We've also talked a lot on Car Chat about the future needs of the electric power-grid itself to recharge all these EVs (in addition to present and future needs), but precious little evidence (outside of talk) on just how that is going to be achieved. With more variable weather/climate, the system is going to be more taxed just keeping up with heating/AC needs at home, much less vehicles.
Hydrogen clearly has no future in the US, at least not unless some major breakthrough or if the government gets a horn for it. In other markets, hydrogen has some potential. It is an interesting technology never the less, but before any serious developments into hydrogen cars, someone will have to find an efficient way to extract hydrogen. But then again, if the EV experiment fails and becomes a total fiasco, the government might start pushing hydrogen and the new "big green thing", and manufacturers will have to follow.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 08:21 AM
  #19  
LeX2K's Avatar
LeX2K
Lexus Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 26,052
Likes: 4,328
From: Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
We've also talked a lot on Car Chat about the future needs of the electric power-grid itself to recharge all these EVs (in addition to present and future needs), but precious little evidence (outside of talk) on just how that is going to be achieved. With more variable weather/climate, the system is going to be more taxed just keeping up with heating/AC needs at home, much less vehicles.
Clean hydrogen requires electricity. I think we've been over this more than a couple of times right?
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 09:31 AM
  #20  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 35,481
Likes: 385
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by Och
but before any serious developments into hydrogen cars,
Hydrogen internal combustion engines are already developed for large trucks, the engines are ready. The large truck makers have them behind the scenes. Toyota already has demonstrated that fuel cell technology is ready as well as their new Mirai is larger, drives father, is more powerful, uses a smaller fuel cell (so easier to manufacture)and is cheaper to manufacture than the previous model and most important is cheaper to buy....this is the complete opposite of battery electric models which need mass to gain range which means higher cost which ultimately means consumers have to pay more. Not everyone can charge at home, most will not sit at a charger and pick boogers (who said that? ) while their EV charges. Battery EVs makes sense for the luxury priced segment of cars....hydrogen fuel cells makes sense for cheaper models like Camry and hydrogen ICE models make sense for cheap cars like a Yaris or Corolla as well as large trucks.... Battery cars + hydrogen cars make total sense together for the 79 million cars worldwide that were sold last year...

This report is nonsense. While I think Hyundai gas cars are total trash..their fuel cells they already have are pretty decent. And their batteries electrics are a good effort. It is impossible for the entire industry to go all battery electric. IMPOSSIBLE

Last edited by Toys4RJill; Dec 30, 2021 at 09:46 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 09:32 AM
  #21  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,823
Likes: 4,101
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
battery electric models which need mass to gain range
This actually is not the case...
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 09:35 AM
  #22  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 35,481
Likes: 385
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
This actually is not the case...
Have you seen how heavy battery electrics are? every battery electric that adds more range...is heavier. And every time a buyer wants more range, they have to pay MORE.

it is amazing how hydrogen is a trigger word for you all on here. LOL. Hydrogen compliments battery electrics. Otherwise, gasoline will be never stop being the predominate fuel for cars and trucks

Last edited by Toys4RJill; Dec 30, 2021 at 09:45 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 09:44 AM
  #23  
Motorola's Avatar
Motorola
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 89
From: N/A
Default

Hydrogen combustion is even more costly than hydrogen fuel cell and neither of them address the non-existent infrastructure. Battery tech can improve. Hydrogen infrastructure? Good luck getting investors to buy into that.

Internal combustion is going to die, and companies like Toyota better adapt.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 10:07 AM
  #24  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,823
Likes: 4,101
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Have you seen how heavy battery electrics are? every battery electric that adds more range...is heavier. And every time a buyer wants more range, they have to pay MORE.
Now, but that technology will dramatically improve. Of course more range costs more, range is the new horsepower. Hybrids were a huge premium at first.

it is amazing how hydrogen is a trigger word for you all on here. LOL. Hydrogen compliments battery electrics. Otherwise, gasoline will be never stop being the predominate fuel for cars and trucks
Then why has everybody abandoned hydrogen cars now Including Toyota? It’s just not going to happen.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 10:12 AM
  #25  
LeX2K's Avatar
LeX2K
Lexus Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 26,052
Likes: 4,328
From: Alberta
Default

Mirai and Model 3 have almost exactly the same curb weight.
Originally Posted by SW17LS
Then why has everybody abandoned hydrogen cars now Including Toyota? It’s just not going to happen.
Toyota finally decided they don't feel like going bankrupt.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 10:14 AM
  #26  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,823
Likes: 4,101
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
Toyota finally decided they don't feel like going bankrupt.
Exactly, BEV is a train at this point, it’s a foregone conclusion. Makes no sense to be the small nice tech biting at the heels and makes way more sense to get with the program.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 10:30 AM
  #27  
AMIRZA786's Avatar
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 19,741
Likes: 3,772
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I wouldn't quite use that term, but, if you insist, then I'll say Toyota should put up. Hydrogen, IMO, makes more sense than pure BEV....but only if an adequate network of hydrogen-refill stations can be built and supplied. BEVs are just not feasible for a lot of people. For my own personal needs (although obviously not the case with everyone) an extended-range hybrid with a small gas engine for recharging would probably be best...but GM doesn't offer that option with the Encore GX. Hopefully, it will.
Where hydrogen could make sense is big vans and trucks. You have more places to store tanks, and you can protect them better (hydrogen is highly explosive). But, when battery tech improves, it will make hydrogen obsolete
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 10:36 AM
  #28  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,460
Likes: 232
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
Where hydrogen could make sense is big vans and trucks. You have more places to store tanks, and you can protect them better (hydrogen is highly explosive). But, when battery tech improves, it will make hydrogen obsolete
Hydrogen has always been obsolete. The big vans and trucks that require a large amount of energy can just use gas. If you save majority of the gas by eliminating from light passenger cars, there is plenty for commercial use for a very very long time. Lets see how Toyota plays their Hydrogen card. I have a feeling their hydrogen messaging will soften drastically in the next year
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 10:38 AM
  #29  
Och's Avatar
Och
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,035
Likes: 247
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Have you seen how heavy battery electrics are? every battery electric that adds more range...is heavier. And every time a buyer wants more range, they have to pay MORE.

it is amazing how hydrogen is a trigger word for you all on here. LOL. Hydrogen compliments battery electrics. Otherwise, gasoline will be never stop being the predominate fuel for cars and trucks
Originally Posted by SW17LS
Now, but that technology will dramatically improve. Of course more range costs more, range is the new horsepower. Hybrids were a huge premium at first.

Then why has everybody abandoned hydrogen cars now Including Toyota? It’s just not going to happen.
All else equal, the only practical way to add range is to increase the capacity of the battery, making it bigger and heavier. Batteries have existed for ever a century, Li-ion rechargeable batteries have been around for over three decades, they have no further room for improvement. Battery capacity hasn't increased in over a decade, most of the improvements has been to battery management withing battery packs, but that technology has pretty much hit the limit, any further improvements are going to be marginal and not practical from the standpoint of cost. Without a breakthrough in battery tech, its going to linger around what is available now, do not expect any "dramatic" improvements.

If the powers that be decide they can cash in on Hydrogen, they will start pushing it hard, much like they are currently doing with the EVs, and automakers will follow. Hydrogen infrastructure is far easier to build, as you can transport it in tanks much like they currently do with petrol, existing gas stations can be converted to hydrogen, you don't need to run it to every house, and if there is actually a breakthrough in hydrogen extracting tech, perhaps existing NG infrastructure could be used to supply hydrogen. Imagine burning hydrogen in your stove?
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2021 | 10:40 AM
  #30  
AMIRZA786's Avatar
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 19,741
Likes: 3,772
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
Those still clamoring for hybrids also seem to believe that 6 and 8 cylinders will somehow still be kept alive in hybrid form, when in truth only 4 cylinder turbo hybrids have any feasibility of making it into the future. And I would much rather take an EV over a 4 cylinder.
I briefly switched to a 4 cylinder turbo and came back a year later. I've driven the Honda Accord 2.0t Sport, and although it drives nice, has more power and is faster than it's 3.5L V6 it replaced, I would take take the 8th or 9th Gen Accord V6 over it any day. As far as Hydrogen, it could have its place in bigger vehicles and trucks, but once better battery tech arrives it will just make hydrogen obsolete
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:59 PM.