EV charging in the US is broken — can it be fixed?
I drive 87 miles one way to work, I fill up my car in 4 minutes and I'm on the freeway again. Sometimes I only have 3 hours after a 16 hour shift before I go back to work another 16 hour shift so I don't have 15, 20, 30 minutes to charge. That being said, I would readily buy an EV that had a 500 mile range and charged at least halfway in 5 minutes for half the cost of gas. Or fully at home in a couple hours and electricity wasn't 26 cents per KWH... but I'll never give up my gas car, I enjoy driving, hearing the engine, the shifting, the experience, that's taken away with driving a golf cart with a body kit.
I drive 87 miles one way to work, I fill up my car in 4 minutes and I'm on the freeway again. Sometimes I only have 3 hours after a 16 hour shift before I go back to work another 16 hour shift so I don't have 15, 20, 30 minutes to charge. That being said, I would readily buy an EV that had a 500 mile range and charged at least halfway in 5 minutes for half the cost of gas. Or fully at home in a couple hours and electricity wasn't 26 cents per KWH... but I'll never give up my gas car, I enjoy driving, hearing the engine, the shifting, the experience, that's taken away with driving a golf cart with a body kit.
These newfangled veehickels will never replace horse-drawn wagons. People have to stop every so often to put "gasoline" in them. What if there aint no place selling gasoline where the veehickel stops because its "tank" is empty? And you got to stop the veehickel and get out to put the gasoline in! Even if it's raining or snowing and you get all wet. It takes time for the stuff to get into the "gas tank" and who has time to waste just standing there. You put a feed bag on your horse and it can eat WHILE MOVING ALONG. And a horse can work for ten years, and don't require no fancy "mechanic" to fix 'em. And have you seen what a can of gasoline costs! You can buy three bushels of oats for that much money. That Ford guy is nuts.
Last edited by Zammer; May 19, 2021 at 10:45 AM. Reason: omission
These newfangled veehickels will never replace horse-drawn wagons. People have to stop every so often to put "gasoline" in them. There aint a gasoline selling place within 20 miles of where most people live. And you got to stop the veehickel and get out to put the gasoline in! Even if it's raining or snowing and you get all wet. It takes time for the stuff to get into the "gas tank" and who has time to waste just standing there. You put a feed bag on your horse and it can eat WHILE MOVING ALONG. And a horse can work for ten years, and don't require no fancy "mechanic" to fix 'em. And have you seen what a can of gasoline costs! You can buy three bushels of oats for that much money. That Ford guy is nuts.
Your sarcasm will be noted IF we ever get an adequate electric-charging-station network for those who do not (or cannot, because of design) have them in their homes. And, as of now, that is still a long IF.
Don't sell your buggy whip stocks.
I drive 87 miles one way to work, I fill up my car in 4 minutes and I'm on the freeway again. Sometimes I only have 3 hours after a 16 hour shift before I go back to work another 16 hour shift so I don't have 15, 20, 30 minutes to charge. That being said, I would readily buy an EV that had a 500 mile range and charged at least halfway in 5 minutes for half the cost of gas. Or fully at home in a couple hours and electricity wasn't 26 cents per KWH... but I'll never give up my gas car, I enjoy driving, hearing the engine, the shifting, the experience, that's taken away with driving a golf cart with a body kit.
Look up Storedot batteries. They already have batteries that charge to 80% in five minutes, and will have 100% 5 minute charges in a few years. They have batteries out to various manufacturers for testing already. So for everyone that is worried about charging taking too long, this issue is already almost solved, they just aren’t in production cars yet. Regardless, the tech exists, which is great.
To those that think fewer people will be driving in the future, your correct IMO. It will eventually be reserved for the rich. More will work from home. Car use will be taxed. Owning an ICE engine will be a spectacle. This is far in the future. But we are headed there, at least anywhere near a metro. Indy already has small EV cars you can rent on the street. So people who live downtown and work downtown don’t need cars. If you need to drive, you just run your card and get in an EV. Otherwise, walk or bike. They also have bikes and scooters for rent on the street.
Drones that drop off groceries are already being tested. A driverless Uber force is planned. We are seeing the plans for infrastructure that doesn't require personal vehicles for large populations, in its infancy.
We do need more power, but I bet we start to see that soon. The sun can create power. The wind can. It’s all around us, we just need to harness it. Technically, houses can self sustain with the right equipment in sunny states. That technology is advancing as well.
To those that think fewer people will be driving in the future, your correct IMO. It will eventually be reserved for the rich. More will work from home. Car use will be taxed. Owning an ICE engine will be a spectacle. This is far in the future. But we are headed there, at least anywhere near a metro. Indy already has small EV cars you can rent on the street. So people who live downtown and work downtown don’t need cars. If you need to drive, you just run your card and get in an EV. Otherwise, walk or bike. They also have bikes and scooters for rent on the street.
Drones that drop off groceries are already being tested. A driverless Uber force is planned. We are seeing the plans for infrastructure that doesn't require personal vehicles for large populations, in its infancy.
We do need more power, but I bet we start to see that soon. The sun can create power. The wind can. It’s all around us, we just need to harness it. Technically, houses can self sustain with the right equipment in sunny states. That technology is advancing as well.
Last edited by Jwconeil; May 19, 2021 at 11:12 AM.
I still find it hilarious how many obstacles EVs still face. Half of the country doesn’t want them (my guess) and cars are cleaner than ever. It’s still going to be a long time before infrastructure catches up.
My OLD LS430 designed in the late 90s is a SULEV. That was 20 years ago.
My OLD LS430 designed in the late 90s is a SULEV. That was 20 years ago.
These newfangled veehickels will never replace horse-drawn wagons. People have to stop every so often to put "gasoline" in them. What if there aint no place selling gasoline where the veehickel stops because its "tank" is empty? And you got to stop the veehickel and get out to put the gasoline in! Even if it's raining or snowing and you get all wet. It takes time for the stuff to get into the "gas tank" and who has time to waste just standing there. You put a feed bag on your horse and it can eat WHILE MOVING ALONG. And a horse can work for ten years, and don't require no fancy "mechanic" to fix 'em. And have you seen what a can of gasoline costs! You can buy three bushels of oats for that much money. That Ford guy is nuts.
I still find it hilarious how many obstacles EVs still face. Half of the country doesn’t want them (my guess) and cars are cleaner than ever. It’s still going to be a long time before infrastructure catches up.
My OLD LS430 designed in the late 90s is a SULEV. That was 20 years ago.
My OLD LS430 designed in the late 90s is a SULEV. That was 20 years ago.
The experience of a modern ICE car is getting just as sterilized as an EV, and its not the vehicle manufacturers fault. All the safety and stability control systems pretty much require electronic throttle, steering and brake control, further isolating the driver for the driving experience. This is why older "analog" ICE cars have been shooting up in price.
I do find it quite funny how one of the big draws of ICE is supposedly the "engine sound", when in reality most new cars nowadays simply have pumped-in audio mimicking engine sounds because the engines themselves are so quiet.
"Analog" ICE cars without ABS or traction control or airbags are also more likely to kill you, so there's that to keep in mind.
I do find it quite funny how one of the big draws of ICE is supposedly the "engine sound", when in reality most new cars nowadays simply have pumped-in audio mimicking engine sounds because the engines themselves are so quiet.
I do find it quite funny how one of the big draws of ICE is supposedly the "engine sound", when in reality most new cars nowadays simply have pumped-in audio mimicking engine sounds because the engines themselves are so quiet.
I think its great that half do want them and they should get that choice. I also think that rushing EV adoption by banning ICE is the wrong approach. I think if EV had enough supporting infrastructure and was nearly equivalent in terms of convenience, people will naturally gravitate toward them as they will offer a better solution (faster, less cost to own, smoother, quieter, cleaner) over ICE. ICE will naturally go away given there is a superior technology.
I’ve used this example before but a diesel 8500lb Ford F-350 has a 4 figure torque rating, will smoke 9/10 luxury cars from 20 years ago, and deliver 15-16 MPG unloaded. What is there not to like about that? (Other than the cost of admission lol.)
Agree. If people want them, more power to them and I’m glad there are lots of choices. My problem is them being forced on me. I do disagree, though, that EV is superior.
I’ve used this example before but a diesel 8500lb Ford F-350 has a 4 figure torque rating, will smoke 9/10 luxury cars from 20 years ago, and deliver 15-16 MPG unloaded. What is there not to like about that? (Other than the cost of admission lol.)
I’ve used this example before but a diesel 8500lb Ford F-350 has a 4 figure torque rating, will smoke 9/10 luxury cars from 20 years ago, and deliver 15-16 MPG unloaded. What is there not to like about that? (Other than the cost of admission lol.)













