When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
C&D: Three-Row SUVs Compared: Explorer, Telluride, Palisade, Enclave, and CX-9
An interesting read. It's longer than I want to post here, so here are the highlights and ranking. Full article here. I just wish they could've waited a bit longer to put the new Highlander in this comparison. Next time...
5th Place:
Buick Enclave
Highs: The any-way-you-fold-'em cargo champ and the passing-acceleration king. Lows: The most money nets you the least stuff and a cheap-feeling interior. Verdict: Remember the Buick Open? This is a time capsule from that era.
4th Place:
Ford Explorer
Highs: Longitudinal engine—just like a BMW! Lows: Sparsely equipped and cheap inside—just like a last-generation Explorer. Verdict: Ford lays the foundation for a brighter future but lets the Lincoln Aviator realize it.
3rd Place:
Mazda CX-9
Highs: Still the undisputed driver's choice, comfortable even if it is small. Lows: You can beat it for the money. Verdict: Sports-car dreams drown in the sound of crying babes—or in a flood of Korean value.
2nd Place:
Hyundai Palisade
Highs: Everything you ever wanted, plus a few USB ports you didn't know you needed. Lows: Could use an exterior design consult. Verdict: If it's a spacious space fish you seek, Hyundai is probably running a good deal right now.
1st Place: Kia Telluride
Highs: All the strengths of the Hyundai, plus a rugged and not-weird shape. Lows: The skinny tires are so hard not to stare at. Verdict: Give the people what they want and they'll return the favor with laurels—and sales.
Interesting article. Generally I agree with everything the author says. Korean value is getting harder to beat these days. Personally I prefer the looks of the CX-9, and I don't mind sacrificing some cargo room and a bit of cabin space for driveability. The Palisade/Telluride are tempting, but as it stands, I don't think I'd trade my CX-9 in for either one.
Interesting. They prefer the Kia styling over the Hyunday, but I'm the exact opposite, so I'd put Palisade #1 and Telluride #2. I've seen a few new Explorers on the road - really like the front (headlights, grille redesign), but looks way too similar as the outgoing model from all other angles. And I just think they've over-priced it for what it is.
An interesting read. It's longer than I want to post here, so here are the highlights and ranking. Full article here. I just wish they could've waited a bit longer to put the new Highlander in this comparison. Next time...[h2]
Interesting to see how the Mazda has the slowest acceleration, and the longest braking, is the lightest curb weight and is then called the best drivers choice....least power too.
The Buick looks the best.
But look at their comments on the V6?
The 3.6-liter six-cylinder is always at the ready with power, but its coarseness is unbecoming a car that purports to be from a luxury brand.
Last edited by Toys4RJill; Oct 21, 2019 at 01:28 PM.
Interesting to see how the Mazda has the slowest acceleration, and the longest braking, is the lightest curb weight and is then called the best drivers choice....least power too.
If you drive one, you'll see why. It isn't just about what's on the spec sheet, it's the way it feels when you take a turn, or merge onto a highway, or the way it feels when you swerve to dodge a pothole. You could call it the Miata of the three-row SUVs - it's underpowered, but it drives so well.
Interesting to see how the Mazda has the slowest acceleration, and the longest braking, is the lightest curb weight and is then called the best drivers choice....least power too.
But that is where chassis/steering engineering and driving feel come in........something Mazda has always excelled in.
The Buick looks the best.
But look at their comments on the V6?
The 3.6-liter six-cylinder is always at the ready with power, but its coarseness is unbecoming a car that purports to be from a luxury bran
As an owner, I've been driving that engine daily now for 26 months. IMO, it is anything BUT coarse. It also, with the 9-speed, variable fuel management, and engine start-stop feature, turns in roughly the economy of a non-turbo 4.
The actual materials inside aren't that different from the previous-generation 2019, but they made what IMO were some design-goofs.
I had several of the previous gen Explorers as rentals. Was never impressed with their interior quality. I was hoping for an improvement with this gen.
Didn't see the link.....I looked closely.
You didn't look close enough. Perhaps my link was too discrete. See my third sentence, this time in bold.
Originally Posted by JDR76
An interesting read. It's longer than I want to post here, so here are the highlights and ranking. Full article here. I just wish they could've waited a bit longer to put the new Highlander in this comparison. Next time...
to me enclave was a clear disappointment and i really wanted to like it.
to quote them:
The most money nets you the least stuff and a cheap-feeling interior.
I don't entirely disagree with them. Like the first-generation Enclave, it looks better inside than it feels. And the Lacrosse does have plusher, softer seats.....I don't know why the Enclave uses firmer-feeling cushions.
But that is where chassis/steering engineering and driving feel come in........something Mazda has always excelled in.
.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah....so chiche.
Originally Posted by mmarshall
As an owner, I've been driving that engine daily now for 26 months. IMO, it is anything BUT coarse. It also, with the 9-speed, variable fuel management, and engine start-stop feature, turns in roughly the economy of a non-turbo 4.
It is dumb comments like what C & D said in this comparo that irritate me...Buick is not even the same brand to compare. Should be the Chevrolet.
Originally Posted by sm1ke
If you drive one, you'll see why. It isn't just about what's on the spec sheet, it's the way it feels when you take a turn, or merge onto a highway, or the way it feels when you swerve to dodge a pothole. You could call it the Miata of the three-row SUVs - it's underpowered, but it drives so well.
EDIT: Pardon me, my bias is showing.. :P
No doubt. Just giving the alternative perspective on something. This is where I have said in the past, some vehicle are not really for the same demographic.
I had several of the previous gen Explorers as rentals. Was never impressed with their interior quality. I was hoping for an improvement with this gen.
The Aviator, of course, done on the same platform, solves the interior-materials problem, but at quite a price. That's one reason I like the Corsair....Aviator interior at a lower price, assuming one does not need the third-row seating.
You didn't look close enough. Perhaps my link was too discrete. See my third sentence, this time in bold.
OK...Gotcha. It was in dark blue with all that black around it....just got past me.
Toyota and Lexus Join Mille Miglia For The First Time
Slideshow: A five-car lineup spanning more than five decades of Toyota performance and engineering will tackle one of Italy's most celebrated automotive routes.