Acura Chops $20k Off Poor-Selling NSX Supercar
#31
I personally think that Acura aimed a bit too high at first. A base model with the TT V-6 and no hybrid system would have been lighter and cheaper to build. It would be RWD only and could have listed for something near $100K. The full blown hybrid version then could then be marketed as an upgrade and include all the exotic stuff that is in the current car.
I love the styling and would really enjoy the performance, but the price puts it out of my comfort zone even with a $20,000 discount.
I love the styling and would really enjoy the performance, but the price puts it out of my comfort zone even with a $20,000 discount.
#32
Cars for Rodney Dangerfield?
I owned a pre-owned 2004 NSX series II. Sold a 34 year old BMW with 20K miles that I owned from new to a collector, took the $, flew to Florida where they were having a bankruptcy auction in W. Palm Beach. (No auctions are allowed in Palm Beach, except I think for charity.) There were a dozen or so exotic cars up, The last was the NSX, by that time everyone had left with their Bentleys etc. As the only bidder I got it for stupid low money. Happy birthday!
Drove it up the 81 route to where I was living in northern New England. Got to see a bit of America I'd only heard about. That car was as reliable as a paperclip and an excellent crumpet-catcher. Even my Corvette neighbors liked it. I ended up selling it for quite a bit more than I bought it for. I even took a few laps around Lime Rock Park in it with an instructor. Scared me half to death the instructor did. He drove a Porsche.
I do have a warm feeling for my Naughty SC430. The two have a family resemblance to each other, in my mind, n'est-ce pas? Why do you think?
I wonder how the die-hards will take the new mid-engine Corvette what's the buzz Are good mid-engine sports cars just difficult to....AWD OMG?
PS
I still don't know why I sold it.....
Drove it up the 81 route to where I was living in northern New England. Got to see a bit of America I'd only heard about. That car was as reliable as a paperclip and an excellent crumpet-catcher. Even my Corvette neighbors liked it. I ended up selling it for quite a bit more than I bought it for. I even took a few laps around Lime Rock Park in it with an instructor. Scared me half to death the instructor did. He drove a Porsche.
I do have a warm feeling for my Naughty SC430. The two have a family resemblance to each other, in my mind, n'est-ce pas? Why do you think?
I wonder how the die-hards will take the new mid-engine Corvette what's the buzz Are good mid-engine sports cars just difficult to....AWD OMG?
PS
I still don't know why I sold it.....
Last edited by ivanj; 05-18-19 at 04:27 PM.
#33
#35
I personally think that Acura aimed a bit too high at first. A base model with the TT V-6 and no hybrid system would have been lighter and cheaper to build. It would be RWD only and could have listed for something near $100K. The full blown hybrid version then could then be marketed as an upgrade and include all the exotic stuff that is in the current car.
I love the styling and would really enjoy the performance, but the price puts it out of my comfort zone even with a $20,000 discount.
I love the styling and would really enjoy the performance, but the price puts it out of my comfort zone even with a $20,000 discount.
#36
#37
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
I owned a pre-owned 2004 NSX series II. Sold a 34 year old BMW with 20K miles that I owned from new to a collector, took the $, flew to Florida where they were having a bankruptcy auction in W. Palm Beach. (No auctions are allowed in Palm Beach, except I think for charity.) There were a dozen or so exotic cars up, The last was the NSX, by that time everyone had left with their Bentleys etc. As the only bidder I got it for stupid low money. Happy birthday!
That car was as reliable as a paperclip and an excellent crumpet-catcher.
I do have a warm feeling for my Naughty SC430. The two have a family resemblance to each other, in my mind, n'est-ce pas? Why do you think?
and anyone who thinks this is ugly just doesn't like exotic sports cars.
i LOVE it.
#39
Lexus Fanatic
#40
Lexus Fanatic
The NSX has a totally unique engine unlike the Ford GT which shares the same basic design/block with the basic Eco Boost used in so many Ford vehicles. The 75 deg DOHC engine in the NSX shares nothing with any other Honda engine, it is a totally unique new ground up design which is also why it is so expensive to make, just the NSX engine costs around 65K to make.
#41
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
P.S. what you said is incredibly condescending.
#42
#43
The NSX has a totally unique engine unlike the Ford GT which shares the same basic design/block with the basic Eco Boost used in so many Ford vehicles. The 75 deg DOHC engine in the NSX shares nothing with any other Honda engine, it is a totally unique new ground up design which is also why it is so expensive to make, just the NSX engine costs around 65K to make.
Not only that the Ford GTs 3.5 V6TT makes 647hp 550ft# hp while the Acura's 3.5V6TT makes 500hp 406 ft# (573 hp/476ft# total system). Very poor showing for a Acura's 3.5 V6TT
#44
Lexus Fanatic
its generic in the sense that theres 3.5 V6 and V6TT all over the place. This thing wouldve been so much better with a 4.0 V8TT. Sadly Honda/Acura has no experience making a non race engine that's more than 6 cylinders
Not only that the Ford GTs 3.5 V6TT makes 647hp 550ft# hp while the Acura's 3.5V6TT makes 500hp 406 ft# (573 hp/476ft# total system). Very poor showing for a Acura's 3.5 V6TT
Not only that the Ford GTs 3.5 V6TT makes 647hp 550ft# hp while the Acura's 3.5V6TT makes 500hp 406 ft# (573 hp/476ft# total system). Very poor showing for a Acura's 3.5 V6TT
Problem with the Ford GT outside of its ridiculous price for a 6 cylinder Ecoboost, being uncomfortable, cheapened interior is with all that power and light weight it is not really outperforming the NSX or many other cars after several tests.