When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The last one I sampled (though it was, admittedly, several years ago), steered and drove like a school bus. The interior was El-Plastico-cheap throughout. And its ride, while not particularly harsh, was not what I would call smooth, especially compared to, say, the competition from Ford or GM. The only more unpleasant full-size SUV I've sampled was the absolutely terrible Ford Excursion, which was a 7500-lb. .
I didnt mind it. Has that wonderful adaptive variable suspension from the LX570. Same engine. Lots of features. Build for the long haul.
I didnt mind it. Has that wonderful adaptive variable suspension from the LX570. Same engine. Lots of features. Build for the long haul.
But it this is not really about the Sequoia.
Agreed...back to topic. I hope to get some pictures of Mike's new Expedition in a couple of days, after the snow melts off, the roads dry out, the salt is gone, and he gets it washed and cleaned. (I rubbed out an abrasion-mark in the paint today, for him, with the SCRATCH-OUT). It will also give me a chance to try out my new i-Phone-7 camera, if and when I figure out how to use it LOL.
As expensive as these larger vehicles are, its no surprise at all that people are keeping them longer.
Unfortunately, his old 2003 Expedition was clearly showing its age....constant nickel-and-dime stuff deteriorating and needing repair or replacement, and occasional larger repairs. There comes a point where, IMO, it is no longer practical to try and keep a clunker running....particularly in my area, where you have to pass a Virginia State Safety inspection every year and EPA-mandated emissions tests every other year. While I am able to help him do minor stuff, neither of us has the kind of training and/or ASE-certification you have, to do larger things, from your experience both in and out of the Army. And, besides, our condo association does not allow major vehicle repairs to be done in the private parking spaces.
The only more unpleasant full-size SUV I've sampled was the absolutely terrible Ford Excursion, which was a 7500-lb. dinosaur that was clearly too large and heavy for its suspension/underpinnings, which, in my experience in the test-drive, made it unstable to the point of being borderline-dangerous at highway speeds and/or road-irregularities.
That doesn't seem right, given that it was literally built on the Super Duty chassis.
I've talked to very few owners who didn't love their Excursion, and I know people miss it. But the fuel prices of the late 2000's killed it, and i doubt Ford is in a hurry to cannibalize Expedition sales by bringing it back.
I've talked to very few owners who didn't love their Excursion, and I know people miss it. But the fuel prices of the late 2000's killed it, and i doubt Ford is in a hurry to cannibalize Expedition sales by bringing it back.
For sure. I am sure there some that hated, while there are some that loved it. I doubt we would ever see on again, but you never know.
That doesn't seem right, given that it was literally built on the Super Duty chassis.
Have you ever driven one? The one I sampled rocked back and forth and side-to-side over bumps (tire pressure was OK), and, just before coming to a full-stop, the large nose would drop and bounce back up again....you could actually watch the bobbing from the drivers' seat. I though it was one of the worst-handling SUVs's I ever tried, even by large-SUV standards.
Fine, apparently we can agree to disagree. No sense arguing all night. Anyhow, the topic is the Expedition, not the Excursion....partly my fault for bringing it up.