Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Ford cancels Focus Active import plans due to China tariffs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-18, 08:25 PM
  #46  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,503
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
This article from Business Insider considers it a trade deal.

https://www.businessinsider.com/trum...roblems-2018-8
The article is wrong. It’s poor journalism.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 09-02-18, 08:26 PM
  #47  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall

That is markedly changing, though, with the tariffs. What worked in the past will not necessarily work in the future.
You have quoted me out of context. Yes, any tariffs on imported cars will increase the cost of those cars that are built overseas and imported here.

But that does not suddenly make it profitable to build and sell a low number of those vehicles here. Building and selling here has a cost and it will be the same regardless of what tariffs may be on imported vehicles.

If the income an automaker generates by selling a low-volume model (like the Envision, CT6 Hybrid, EcoSport of Focus Active) is LESS than what it costs to build, the automaker is selling at a loss. No automaker will do that for long. How hard is that to understand?
Sulu is offline  
Old 09-02-18, 08:37 PM
  #48  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,665
Received 85 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
You have quoted me out of context. Yes, any tariffs on imported cars will increase the cost of those cars that are built overseas and imported here.
If I did in fact quote you out of context, that was not intentional. I was simply trying to make a point about the tariffs. We live in a new world now...not the one of the past, where a company could just wave a magic wand, ship jobs and production overseas, and make big profits off of cheap labor.

But that does not suddenly make it profitable to build and sell a low number of those vehicles here. Building and selling here has a cost and it will be the same regardless of what tariffs may be on imported vehicles.
Much of that will depend on the long-term effects of corporate tax cuts in the bill that was recently passed. Those cuts may (?) help profits, especially on domestically-produced vehicles.

If the income an automaker generates by selling a low-volume model (like the Envision, CT6 Hybrid, EcoSport of Focus Active) is LESS than what it costs to build, the automaker is selling at a loss. No automaker will do that for long. How hard is that to understand?
Toyota sold Prius models, in the American market, at a loss for a number of years, though I don't know exactly how many. Their big profits on vehicles like the 4Runner, Tacoma, Sequoia, etc..... more than covered it.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 09-02-18, 08:40 PM
  #49  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,743
Received 2,545 Likes on 1,836 Posts
Default

You can't argue about business with somebody who just doesn't have any experience with how businesses run lol

Tax cuts aren't going to make individual products more profitable.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 09-02-18, 08:50 PM
  #50  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,665
Received 85 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
You can't argue about business with somebody who just doesn't have any experience with how businesses run lol

Tax cuts aren't going to make individual products more profitable.
Apples and Oranges. A corporation, especially one as large as Ford or GM, doesn't survive or collapse on the profitability or loss of one or a couple of vehicles...the Toyota Prius proved that. What matters is the ultimate corporate bottom line. That's not amateur of having "experience" or not....that's simple Economics 101.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 09-02-18, 09:03 PM
  #51  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,743
Received 2,545 Likes on 1,836 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Apples and Oranges. A corporation, especially one as large as Ford or GM, doesn't survive or collapse on the profitability or loss of one or a couple of vehicles...the Toyota Prius proved that. What matters is the ultimate corporate bottom line. That's not amateur of having "experience" or not....that's simple Economics 101.


Nobody is saying this car is their life or die product. Its simple, Ford is saying that it doesn't make sense for them to sell this car here if they can't build it in China under the old tariff scheme. Simple.

The ultimate corporate bottom line matters of course, but it doesn't come into play when determining the profitability of one model. For instance I just discontinued a marketing program that we were doing that wasn't profitable. It still wouldnt have been profitable even if my total gross or net profit were 10 times what it is.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 09-03-18, 06:32 AM
  #52  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,503
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Apples and Oranges. A corporation, especially one as large as Ford or GM, doesn't survive or collapse on the profitability or loss of one or a couple of vehicles...the Toyota Prius proved that. What matters is the ultimate corporate bottom line. That's not amateur of having "experience" or not....that's simple Economics 101.
I am not sure if the Prius example is similar to the Ford example here. Ford is not losing money producing the vehicle, the Trump tariffs do not change how they make the car. The tariffs are added to the car and paid for by US consumers. The money then goes to the US government.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 09-03-18, 06:42 AM
  #53  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,743
Received 2,545 Likes on 1,836 Posts
Default

And Toyota chose to sell the Prius at a loss to accomplish an overall goal, to corner the market on the burgeoning hybrid car market...which they did. The two situations as Jill said have nothing to do with each other.

Ford COULD sell the car here at a loss, but they have chosen not to...doesnt change the fact that the loss is because of the tariffs. If you wanted this car and you live in America, the tariffs are why you can't buy it is the point.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 09-03-18, 07:16 AM
  #54  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,503
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Ford COULD sell the car here at a loss, but they have chosen not to...doesnt change the fact that the loss is because of the tariffs. If you wanted this car and you live in America, the tariffs are why you can't buy it is the point.
Makes no sense to do it.

Those advocating for these tariffs haven't been watching what has been quietly going on. China tariffs on US cars are now at 40% (they were increased) while the EU cars have been dropped to 15% Very difficult to say Trump is winning his trade war. Trump should be trying to create jobs in the US clean energy sector and protect those industries with tariffs.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 09-03-18 at 07:21 AM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 09-03-18, 07:23 AM
  #55  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,075
Received 62 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Ford is making a short term play to revive their stock price which is in the toilet.
Therefore cutting car production which has smaller profit margins and focusing on SUVs/Trucks.

Ford has mad poor decisions for the last half century. They are a joke.
They at one point owned Jaguar, Land Rover, Aston Martin and Volvo. Their lack of prescence in the luxury space has killed their overall profitability. They also had Mercury and a top luxury brand in Lincoln. The company is a shell of its former self due to poor business decisions.

Mark my words this will be the nail in the coffin - the only way they survive is by getting bought out.

Last edited by RNM GS3; 09-03-18 at 07:34 AM.
RNM GS3 is offline  
Old 09-03-18, 07:23 AM
  #56  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,743
Received 2,545 Likes on 1,836 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Makes no sense to do it.
Exactly...

Theres this idea that the "big bad corporation will just start building stuff here and take the increased cost out of their massive profit" but thats just not reality. The cost of those tariffs WILL be passed on to the consumer, and they will cause reduced choices for our consumers because of carmakers adjusting their offerings based on a different reality.

The other part of it is the US is not the world's only auto consumer. China is already a huge consumer, and will get bigger and bigger, companies like Ford choose to do things like cancel all their sedans in the US and focus their car efforts in other countries. If they can't make money here and they can make money elsewhere they'll go there. If being an "American corporation" becomes too burdensome for them, they'll just become a corporation somewhere else.

Last edited by SW17LS; 09-03-18 at 07:28 AM.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 09-03-18, 07:29 AM
  #57  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,665
Received 85 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
Ford is making a short term play to revive their stock price which is in the toilet.
Therefore cutting car production which has smaller profit margins and focusing on SUVs/Trucks.

Ford has mad poor decisions for the last half century. They are a joke.
They at one point owned Jaguar, Land Rover, Aston Martin. They also had Mercury and a top luxury brand in Lincoln.
The company is a shell of its former self due to poor business decisions.

Mark my words this will be the nail in the coffin - the only way they survive is by getting bought out.

You may very well be correct.....we'll see. I posted some examples earlier of both the good and bad decisions that Ford has made. I agree they are neglecting sedans too much at the cost of trucks and SUVs.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 09-03-18, 07:32 AM
  #58  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,743
Received 2,545 Likes on 1,836 Posts
Default

Ford is not going anywhere. On top of the truck and SUV market they have here (which has HUGE margins), they have a great car business in Europe, it goes on. Theres a reason why Ford was the only US automaker that didn't need a government bailout.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 09-03-18, 07:36 AM
  #59  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,665
Received 85 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Theres a reason why Ford was the only US automaker that didn't need a government bailout.
They laid off huge numbers of employees, for one thing, which contributed to the double-digit unemployment numbers of the early Obama years, before those numbers began to improve. Partly under Obama and partly under Trump, unemployment is much lower now.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 09-03-18, 07:40 AM
  #60  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,075
Received 62 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Ford is not going anywhere. On top of the truck and SUV market they have here (which has HUGE margins), they have a great car business in Europe, it goes on. Theres a reason why Ford was the only US automaker that didn't need a government bailout.
My friend what has Ford done that gives you such confidence.

Do you not remember everone and their momma driving Hummer H2s and then these same SUVs were worthless.
History repeats itself over and over. You cant run a big successful company like Ford has done. Just look how weak their leadership is at the top with lots of change. Mulaly was the only decent CEO in recent memory because he invested in the product and had a long term vision. Their focus now is to be a mobility company lol. Its a joke.

Also have u looked at their miniscule stock price and huge dividend.
They are one economic slowdown away from being in real trouble. They have strong liquidity still but when inventory is not moving - money starts to run out fast.

Last edited by RNM GS3; 09-03-18 at 07:44 AM.
RNM GS3 is offline  


Quick Reply: Ford cancels Focus Active import plans due to China tariffs



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:56 AM.