2018 Kia Stinger
#136
Pole Position
Curious why you didn't consider a q50/q60 AWD instead? Congrats though...
#137
The pursuit of F
As for the others I considered to varying degrees:
- BMW nor MB interest me styling-wise (3/4-series and/or C-class)
- XE is cheap on the inside
- I had a '17 A4 eliminating the A5 as its very similar.
- TLX A-Spec (yawn - I'd get an Accord Touring over it)
- Giulia... well FIAT... and quirky looks do not appeal... (exception Quadrifoglio though not what I wanted to spend on a daily driver)
- G70 was the one I was going to go for but exterior styling is a derivative and on the conservative side.
#138
The pursuit of F
Thanks. I don't understand it to this day. Same with Lexus vehicles in the US (IS missed USB for a couple years), NX missed out on HUD and AVS until MY '18, etc. 10x the Canadian market, yet we seem to get the more complete offerings, though where we come short is on interior color offerings compared to the US such as a light grey interior.
#139
drives cars
Congrats! The Stinger seems really impressive - I'm not due for replacing any cars atm but will have this one on my short list in a year or two - would love to see your impressions, especially given we are both IS owners (or, now former IS owner in your case I suppose ). I do like the subtle gray exterior color - I'd probably end up with the same combo if not for the striking red color they have on offer!
#141
Lexus Fanatic
That's the general set-up that most people buying this car would probably want...a sport-oriented bias towards RWD most of the time, and AWD only when it is actually needed. That, of course, allows the front tires to do more of what front tires are expected to do in a sport-oriented vehicle....steer the car and provide feedback to the driver, not combine steering with actual propulsion.
#142
Lexus Fanatic
That's the general set-up that most people buying this car would probably want...a sport-oriented bias towards RWD most of the time, and AWD only when it is actually needed. That, of course, allows the front tires to do more of what front tires are expected to do in a sport-oriented vehicle....steer the car and provide feedback to the driver, not combine steering with actual propulsion.
Actually, some front propulsion is beneficial for a sport oriented car.
#143
Pit Crew
Just took a look at some pics of the 2018 Stinger. Front quarter view is nice. Side view is acceptable. Rear view is atrocious IMO. To me, it appears that the designers started fresh at the front and gradually lost steam and just sorta filled in the back end. Wow, very disappointed. I wouldn't drive that if someone gave it to me free of charge! My opinion only, not trying to offend anyone. I'm sure there will be people liking it......just not me!
#144
1UZFE/2JZGTE
iTrader: (11)
Just took a look at some pics of the 2018 Stinger. Front quarter view is nice. Side view is acceptable. Rear view is atrocious IMO. To me, it appears that the designers started fresh at the front and gradually lost steam and just sorta filled in the back end. Wow, very disappointed. I wouldn't drive that if someone gave it to me free of charge! My opinion only, not trying to offend anyone. I'm sure there will be people liking it......just not me!
#145
Pit Crew
#146
Lexus Fanatic
All else equal, most sporting-type drivers prefer a RWD set-up because it leaves the car, and the drivetrain, better-balanced. Any given set of tires has only so much available traction/grip....no matter what they are trying to do. In general, the less of the actual work that the front tires do in actually propelling the car, the more available grip and traction will be available to give this type of driver what he or she wants most....precise, responsive steering and more neutral handling (vs. understeer). Rear-engined cars used to have the opposite problem.....classic oversteer from all of the weight-bias in back making the tail slide out......but electronic traction-aids and better suspension/steering designs have tamed most of that.
I'm not saying this because I myself am an aggressive driver, or make a habit of driving that way.....I don't. But, no matter what type of driving we do, these are the simple laws of physics. So, that's probably why Kia (and most automakers designing sport-oriented vehicles of this type) choose either RWD or rear-biased AWD. There are, of course, some exceptions....the FWD Ford Taurus SHO and Buick Regal GS.
#149
Lexus Fanatic
All else equal, most sporting-type drivers prefer a RWD set-up because it leaves the car, and the drivetrain, better-balanced. Any given set of tires has only so much available traction/grip....no matter what they are trying to do. In general, the less of the actual work that the front tires do in actually propelling the car, the more available grip and traction will be available to give this type of driver what he or she wants most....precise, responsive steering and more neutral handling (vs. understeer). Rear-engined cars used to have the opposite problem.....classic oversteer from all of the weight-bias in back making the tail slide out......but electronic traction-aids and better suspension/steering designs have tamed most of that.
I'm not saying this because I myself am an aggressive driver, or make a habit of driving that way.....I don't. But, no matter what type of driving we do, these are the simple laws of physics. So, that's probably why Kia (and most automakers designing sport-oriented vehicles of this type) choose either RWD or rear-biased AWD. There are, of course, some exceptions....the FWD Ford Taurus SHO and Buick Regal GS.
I'm not saying this because I myself am an aggressive driver, or make a habit of driving that way.....I don't. But, no matter what type of driving we do, these are the simple laws of physics. So, that's probably why Kia (and most automakers designing sport-oriented vehicles of this type) choose either RWD or rear-biased AWD. There are, of course, some exceptions....the FWD Ford Taurus SHO and Buick Regal GS.
Not true. ^^^ lots of false info. AWD is now preferred.