each to their own but i completely disagree.

 

Remote touch is fine. Software behind it blows

 

the software of the land cruiser touch and the LX are the same are they not?

 

Mouse controller and hand/arm rest take up way too much space.

 

Of all the ones I've played around with, I've found Dodge/Jeep/Chrysler's U-connect touch screen to be the easiest to use. U-connect also doesn't lag or act glitchy in any way. Only nitpick, maybe a minor one is that the graphics aren't quite as good looking as some other systems out there like Tesla's.

BMW, Benz, and Audi's that use the "****" have a definite learning curve to them. Took me a couple of days to get really comfortable with the "****" system on a 2015(or maybe it was a 2016) Benz GL, but once I kind of figured it out, had the "muscle memory" down so to speak, it was pretty straightforward. The Lexus mouse, that's just a horrible idea, very finicky and hard to use for no reason IMO.

As far as the "look", the Tesla model S screen is great, and I really dig the new Audis that put a screen in where your gauges used to be. I like how that Audi system, you can configure it several different ways, big gauges, big map, big map and little gauges, its pretty sweet.

 

Maybe--except that, with the F-Generation of BMWs, and now with the G-Generations, the screen is not set back in the dash hood, so there's no longer a "reach" to the screen. My 328 doesn't have the touch screen--there are certain functions where it would be nice, but the iDrive controller is simple and easy to use, even without looking for certain functions.

 

Out of all the interfaces i've used so far in my short time with rental vehicles- i found the Mazda 6 rotary **** interface to be very easy to use. The software was extremely snappy, no lag like there is on my IS.

The problem with lexus is two fold- the interface is wacky, and the software driving it is slow as heck. Inputting an address is infuriating and as far as I'm concerned its a broken feature.

Been living in Japan for a few months and I noticed that most JDM rental cars here have aftermarket double-din nav systems that are much easier to use. The Toyota Mark X (basically a stretched IS250) I drove had a very nice center stack, with a Pioneer/Denso ( I forget which) touchscreen nav interface that was a pleasure to use. I wish auto makers would stop messing around with dumb interfaces and just give us the ability to put an aftermarket double din without jumping thru hoops or disabling car's functionality.

 

With respect to a PC desktop and laptop, I prefer the traditional mechanical keyboard & mouse - so that I can type hundreds of words/minute.

With a compact cell phone/smart phone, I prefer the capacitive touchscreen pioneered by iPhone, as the original mechanical five way navigation control of 1990's Palm Pilot is inefficient and well and truly passé.

With a car, presently I have both touch screens in 3GS and 5-way remote touch in 4GS, however I must say I prefer the touchscreens, and the touchscreens need not have a very high mount, because these days, head up displays HUD's is already provided.

 

I have to agree......the Lexus mouse-control has never been my cup of tea either, though I did consider an ES350 recently for a purchase. It's OK on a glass-smooth road, but bumps and wavy surfaces can make it quite difficult to use and center.

 

No idea, all I know is that it's laggy and frustrating to use.

I find the arm rest comfortable so I don't mind

 

I assume they are at least quite similar.

The software on my Highlander (Entune) and my GS350 (Enform) are essentially the same.

 

I actually find the remote touch easier on rough surfaces, because you can steady your hand on the wrist-wrest. On my Highlander, there isn't a good place to steady your hand as you are making inputs to the touch screen, so it's worse on a bumpy road.

 

+1. Though, with the mouse, you have to set the feedback decently high so that bumps don't cause it to move around.