Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2018 Honda Accord

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-17, 08:43 PM
  #91  
FatherTo1
Racer
 
FatherTo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,846
Received 114 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

The new Accord looks sportier from the front but I agree with others that it looks unfinished, as if there was a design battle and the team ran out of time. I don't really care for the 3/4 view at all as it is reminiscent of the hideous Accord CrossTour. I was reading a MotorTrend comparo between the Accord and Camry and overall the Accord is the better car, with a more inviting interior and better driving dynamics. Glad the Accord redeems itself with content and substance but, from the angle below, it looks like the car was in an accident and missing parts of the front headlight assembly. The previous Accord was better styled to me.

FatherTo1 is offline  
Old 10-13-17, 02:08 AM
  #92  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,679
Received 156 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FatherTo1
The new Accord looks sportier from the front but I agree with others that it looks unfinished, as if there was a design battle and the team ran out of time. I don't really care for the 3/4 view at all as it is reminiscent of the hideous Accord CrossTour. I was reading a MotorTrend comparo between the Accord and Camry and overall the Accord is the better car, with a more inviting interior and better driving dynamics. Glad the Accord redeems itself with content and substance but, from the angle below, it looks like the car was in an accident and missing parts of the front headlight assembly. The previous Accord was better styled to me.

I agree with you word for word. The front looks totally unfinished. There really is no grille. It's just a big gaping hole with a jumbo unibrow over it. Lazy stylists. I can't see how this appears appealing to anyone, but somehow Car & Driver thinks this is the best looking Accord ever. Can you imagine how such a sharp, upper area would be in a pedestrian collision? It would slice the body right in half! Progress, NOT. This is a major safety hazard for peds. And anything that resembles a Crosstour is shameful. That and the ZDX were two of the ugliest body shapes in recent times.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 10-13-17, 04:54 AM
  #93  
rogerh00
Racer
 
rogerh00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,444
Received 43 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Wow, that angle shows the front nose looking awful.
rogerh00 is offline  
Old 10-13-17, 05:47 AM
  #94  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,585
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
. The front looks totally unfinished. There really is no grille. It's just a big gaping hole with a jumbo unibrow over it.
Yep. Looks like a car still in a body shop where they have not yet replaced the grille.


but somehow Car & Driver thinks this is the best looking Accord ever.
It doesn't look bad once you get past the grille.

Can you imagine how such a sharp, upper area would be in a pedestrian collision? It would slice the body right in half! Progress, NOT. This is a major safety hazard for peds
DOT and NHTSA, though, (apparently) OK'ed the design.

And anything that resembles a Crosstour is shameful. That and the ZDX were two of the ugliest body shapes in recent times.
Though the Crosstour wasn't exactly handsome, I'd consider the ZDX much worse.....around the same level as the Pontiac Aztek. The main problem with the Crosstour was not so much its ugliness as the fact that, unlike the competing Subaru Outback, the egg-shaped rear of the Crosstour just didn't have the same space-efficiency and cargo area. The Honda engineers, IMO, would have been far better off using the platform of the nice, squared-off Acura TSX Sportwagon for the Crosstour, but they didn't.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 10-13-17, 11:04 AM
  #95  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,408
Received 162 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

They took the Civic design, stretched it and made it even uglier than the ugly civic design. You gotta be a hardcore Accord fan to buy this thing, unless you dont plan on looking at the car from the outside ever. Get in the car before the suns up and get home after the sun sets and don't ever turn the lights on.
situman is offline  
Old 10-13-17, 01:21 PM
  #96  
pman6
Racer
 
pman6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

They tried to do fastback coupe, but got something ugly instead.



pman6 is offline  
Old 10-13-17, 04:46 PM
  #97  
evident
Racer
 
evident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 1,381
Received 76 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

doesn't really look so bad. previous generation pre-mmc still looks better IMO.
evident is offline  
Old 10-13-17, 04:53 PM
  #98  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Having no grill is going to be the new fad.
GSteg is offline  
Old 10-13-17, 05:02 PM
  #99  
jer
Instructor
 
jer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: fl
Posts: 849
Received 89 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Personally I like it. Have to see in person if I still feel the same way. As far as the interior, if it looks as good in person as in pics, I think it's much better than the new Camry. But these are subjective, as it's what each individual likes.
jer is offline  
Old 10-13-17, 05:52 PM
  #100  
Propulsion
Advanced
 
Propulsion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 516
Received 43 Likes on 38 Posts
Default


It looks gorgeous in Touring Trim.
The headlight cluster is full LEDs whereas the lower specs are partial LED.
Propulsion is offline  
Old 10-13-17, 06:24 PM
  #101  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,585
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Look at those tires LOL. The wheel-rims themselves might as well be sitting on the carpet.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 10-13-17, 06:44 PM
  #102  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,284
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Look at those tires LOL. The wheel-rims themselves might as well be sitting on the carpet.
Don't judge a book by its cover. You don't need a large sidewall anymore to have a comfortable ride. The Accord Touring has Adaptive Variable Suspension (dampers) and fluid-filled bushings to help improve ride quality. Also active noise cancellation helps mask road and engine noise (always a Honda sore spot).
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 10-13-17, 07:35 PM
  #103  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,585
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Don't judge a book by its cover. You don't need a large sidewall anymore to have a comfortable ride.
You usually do for what I would consider a comfortable ride...though I'll admit that the Lincoln MKZ doesn't do badly with 45s, and some of the older BMWs with even lower profiles than that. But that is not the only issue with wagon-wheels and rubber-band tires. You generally lose some pothole/impact protection, it lowers the stance of the car over speed-bumps, ramps, etc....causing underbelly and air-dam scrapes, makes the tires more expensive to replace, and can cause added suspension/steering-system wear by transmitting more road-impacts through to them. Given a choice, I'll pass.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 10-14-17, 06:12 AM
  #104  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,620
Received 2,521 Likes on 1,819 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
You usually do for what I would consider a comfortable ride...though I'll admit that the Lincoln MKZ doesn't do badly with 45s, and some of the older BMWs with even lower profiles than that. But that is not the only issue with wagon-wheels and rubber-band tires. You generally lose some pothole/impact protection, it lowers the stance of the car over speed-bumps, ramps, etc....causing underbelly and air-dam scrapes, makes the tires more expensive to replace, and can cause added suspension/steering-system wear by transmitting more road-impacts through to them. Given a choice, I'll pass.
What?! Low profile tires don’t lower the stance of the car at all. The wheel/tire combo is the same diameter, there is just more wheel and less tire.

Thats why higher profile fires are on 18s and lower profile fires in 20s. The wheel tire combo diameter for both is the same.

SW17LS is offline  
Old 10-14-17, 06:51 AM
  #105  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,770
Received 2,127 Likes on 1,379 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FatherTo1
The new Accord looks sportier from the front but I agree with others that it looks unfinished, as if there was a design battle and the team ran out of time. I don't really care for the 3/4 view at all as it is reminiscent of the hideous Accord CrossTour. I was reading a MotorTrend comparo between the Accord and Camry and overall the Accord is the better car, with a more inviting interior and better driving dynamics. Glad the Accord redeems itself with content and substance but, from the angle below, it looks like the car was in an accident and missing parts of the front headlight assembly. The previous Accord was better styled to me.

that front looks truly hideous.
bitkahuna is offline  


Quick Reply: 2018 Honda Accord



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:59 AM.