ClubLexus - Lexus Forum Discussion

ClubLexus - Lexus Forum Discussion (https://www.clublexus.com/forums/)
-   Car Chat (https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car-chat-139/)
-   -   Lexus Unfazed by LS Decline as S Class, Model S Grow (https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car-chat/748324-lexus-unfazed-by-ls-decline-as-s-class-model-s-grow.html)

MPLexus301 07-08-14 11:17 AM


Originally Posted by bitkahuna (Post 8616330)
i referred to the R8 not a8 there.

Doh - my bad. You're right!



what's particularly funny is how emphatically fwd is put down on this forum when last month (and probably most months) 2/3rds of u.s. lexus sold are fwd or fwd based awd.
I don't have any problem with FWD or who sells FWD cars. For most buyers, it's a perfectly good solution. For the record, 95+% of Audi sales and 100% of Acura sales are cars that are FWD or an AWD system on a FWD platform. Mercedes' hottest selling product is FWD. BMW's new global platform for Mini and small cars is FWD. You don't find me poking fun at FWD...it has a perfectly good business case, especially when it puts enough money in the bank to fund fun projects like LFAs, R8s, S8s and RC Fs!


rwd is fun. rwd generally gives better weight balance. rwd generally gives better handling. but when sitting in traffic in a city or cruising on a highway (combined what probably 90% of people do), it's irrelevant.
Agree 100%!


audi's quattro system is excellent. oh and typically you don't get giant front wheel gaps like on the gs. :sad:
There you go with a GS jab...lol. Can't disagree though, as Lexus has a ways to go to make their cars "sit" like Quattro Audis.


Originally Posted by Infra (Post 8616338)
Please describe the weakness of using a platform that supports both transverse and longitudinal mountings for the engine, if you can. I'd love to hear it. Be specific, nothing like "worse dynamics" or other subjective feelings & emotions if you please, let's stick to quantifiable tangibles, and compare a RWD-based AWD system vs a FWD-based AWD system.

Um, I don't have any? The A8 is a great car... that is based on a FWD platform. You're asking two different questions - one about platform architecture and another about FWD-biased vs. RWD-biased AWD systems. From what I can tell, Quattro and SH-AWD are the two best on the market. Does that make you happy? Why are you getting so personal here?


Quattro is not a FWD based system when the engine is mounted longitudinal. The only cars with a FWD based quattro are the A3 & the TT. All others include a center differential that then routes power to rear and front, and the cars can have a rear-biased torque split depending on model.
I'm not saying Quattro is an FWD-biased or based system. It's put on FWD cars to make them drive better.


Let's not pretend the cars in this class are ever being driven to where the advantages of RWD are apparent over AWD. It's certainly easy to show examples of the opposite, however, in inclement weather. It doesn't need to be snowy; for example, AWD reacts much better when driving through standing water during heavy rainstorms in the spring/summer.
Who is pretending? Not me.

LexFather 07-08-14 11:32 AM


Originally Posted by doge (Post 8616362)
+1, only internet fan boys with ***** about mundane cars being fwd and automatics. My dd is a fwd buick, and I like it that way. On nice days Ill pull out my cls63 for some quick thrills. Why am I telling you this? There is a place in the world for fwd based cars. Audi knows how to execute it pretty well however Acura doesn't. Acura markets their cars as the intelligent alternative sports sedan, but they don't deliver, thats why I don't like them. On the other hand Audi markets some cars as performance cars and they do deliver, therefor no gripe with fwd....

Interesting. So all these years beating up Lexus and other FWD cars was wrong? Lol.. Cause now it seems since it's Audi, FWD is acceptable.

Interesting.

mmarshall 07-08-14 12:19 PM


Originally Posted by LexFather (Post 8615938)
^^^^ I'm going to respond with the 1989 LS coming back like I have said about the GS 400. It won't happen. Those cars at the time were right for that time and caught the Germans napping. The Germans today are simply not the same companies who take Lexus for granted. They are better than ever. One advantage I can see Lexus really having is if the next gen hybrid is amazing. I have a feeling it will be.

Mike.....what made the 1Gen LS superb was not that it caught the Germans with their pants down (although that did, in fact, happen) but simply the excellence of its own design and build quality. The fact that the front brake rotors sometimes warped from the car's heavy weight and too-small rotor size was only one minor blip on an otherwise excellent car. The LS430 was even better in some ways. The LS460 improved on the refinement/noise isolation even more, but, because of the lower-profile tires and stiffer underpinnings, lost some ride comfort....which is important to many LS buyers (not necessarily you, of course, with your F-Sport package)

doge 07-08-14 03:17 PM


Originally Posted by LexFather (Post 8616396)
Interesting. So all these years beating up Lexus and other FWD cars was wrong? Lol.. Cause now it seems since it's Audi, FWD is acceptable.

Interesting.

For everyday mundane FWD is A okay as long as it isn't marketed as a sports car. Now if lexus were to go and make es-f, throw in some power keep it strictly FWD I would be upset. But since they wont I see no issue. The issue here of audi vs acura is audi is fwd derived... However acuras are usually FWD only and provide no real performance models, however that fwd derrived audi can come with a w12 or a screaming 4.2 v8 etc...

Mr. Burns 07-08-14 06:07 PM

3 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by LexFather (Post 8615938)
Mr. Burns simply brings up a good point. The A8 y'all are fapping off too is a fwd car with awd added. If Lexus attempted that with the LS it would be called a super corolla etc. But it gets a pass. Hilarious. This does not discount it being a fantastic car.

Its fans will defend it as an AWD car, but that's simply not true nor realistic. It's a front drive platform with Quattro. The platform has been optimized for Quattro, but it's still FWD derived, which puts the engine in front of the axles and has FWD proportions. Also available in FWD in other markets.


Originally Posted by bitkahuna (Post 8616330)
:D that's funny. what's particularly funny is how emphatically fwd is put down on this forum when last month (and probably most months) 2/3rds of u.s. lexus sold are fwd or fwd based awd.

FWD is fine when you're buying an RX, ES, A4, etc..., but when you're spending $80k+ for a flagship sedan, it's not acceptable. Forget the Bentleys, they're even worse. I see them around, laughably sad that someone paid $200k for what proportionally looks like a big FWD VW.


Originally Posted by Infra (Post 8616338)
Please describe the weakness of using a platform that supports both transverse and longitudinal mountings for the engine, if you can. I'd love to hear it. Be specific, nothing like "worse dynamics" or other subjective feelings & emotions if you please, let's stick to quantifiable tangibles, and compare a RWD-based AWD system vs a FWD-based AWD system.

One disadvantage is that since the platform is FWD derived, the engine sits in front of the axle. When you get the big engines like in the A8, that will cause understeer and other handling/stability deficiencies when changing direction at high speeds. Second visually the car's proportions are negatively impacted, with long front overhangs, shorter axle to dash distance, and other differences from RWD proportioned cars that make it look more plebian (the A8 suffers notably with this).

Third you don't need AWD all the time, in many places (i.e. west coast) not at all. So you're driving around in a car with all the added weight and complexity of an AWD system, when a RWD version would provide even more entertainment with less complexity. The reason you're driving around in an A8 in southern California with AWD is because Audi would be embarrassed to offer the A8 without it - because it would be FWD, which doesn't have a good image and is inferior dynamically. BMW, Lexus, and Mercedes don't have to worry about this, since their non-AWD versions are still respectable RWD cars.

Back to the A8 specifically, I have never been impressed by the ones I've seen (pre-refresh, not seen a post refresh yet). They have almost no presence outside the front end, with a body and proportions that look like a big VW family sedan. A8 lags the LS in surfacing quality, paint finish, and proportions.

Attachment 496869

The interiors of both are fine, as is to be expected at these prices, but the A8 like most German cars is firm inside, whereas the LS is much more plush in that surfaces feel softer and more wielding.

Attachment 496870
Attachment 496871

The top of the doors for example are padded soft stitched leather on the Lexus, whereas the A8 and even new S-class are borderline hard moulded material. The arm rests on the LS are very soft padded and nicely stitched leather, again very firm in the A8 in comparison.

Then you add in the more obvious disadvantages like less dependability, worse long term resale value, and higher price to buy for what isn't really a better car in the first place and it's why I gave the A8 a lower score. I like to say time reveals all truths, and over and over again it has revealed that the LS is one of the best if not best cars in the segment. LS400 today over any of its rivals of the time. LS430 today over similar era S-class. LS460 today over 2006+ S-class (look how rapidly that big glorified German Chrysler has aged and depreciated). The A8 is certainly no competition in this regard. 5-6 years from now it will be another junk car no one will touch. The LS meanwhile...

hlee12 07-08-14 06:14 PM

who cares if it is fwd, rwd or awd? audis make fine cars. great build quality, great ride, and just a great car.

what a beautiful car. my favorite audi
http://grubbsphoto.files.wordpress.c...udi-rs7-15.jpg

RNM GS3 07-08-14 08:34 PM

FWD based or not, an S8 will run circles around the LS whether its on the dragstrip or on a track.

Also Lexus has much to learn about AWD, their systems are very average.
They are also the ONLY automaker that has the AWD version putting out less power due to poor platform engineering.
Rwd LS 386hp vs AWD LS 360hp = very weak

mmarshall 07-09-14 05:57 AM


Originally Posted by Mr. Burns


Location: Canuckistan

No offense, but where on Earth is Canuckistan? Is that supposed to be a joke? Or is that the name of a town?

doge 07-09-14 06:30 AM


Originally Posted by mmarshall (Post 8617597)
No offense, but where on Earth is Canuckistan? Is that supposed to be a joke? Or is that the name of a town?

Vancouver Canada, the home of the Canucks

bitkahuna 07-09-14 07:03 AM

hlee, i deleted your post about hip/hop and african american buyers. any discussion or posts in those areas, whether factual or not, inevitably leads to arguments, and they're not relevant to this thread anyway.

thank you.

spwolf 07-09-14 07:03 AM


Originally Posted by RNM GS3 (Post 8617254)
FWD based or not, an S8 will run circles around the LS whether its on the dragstrip or on a track.

Also Lexus has much to learn about AWD, their systems are very average.
They are also the ONLY automaker that has the AWD version putting out less power due to poor platform engineering.
Rwd LS 386hp vs AWD LS 360hp = very weak

Whats so average about Lexus/Toyota AWD systems? Is LS designed to compete with S8?

As much as I know, Audi buys its AWD components off the market, and some of them are from Toyota based companies such as JTEKT Torsen (Torsen are for their full time awd, other ones are part-time Haldex based)

Toyota probably makes most AWD vehicles in the world, number of AWD cars sold by Toyota probably outsells complete Audi brand. However they will probably never make AWD based performance vehicles, as they have RWD cars for that. So you will likely not see high performance AWD vehicle (F brand) from Lexus.

This is not a jab at Audi, but nevertheless, Audi does produce a lot of FWD cars and AWD is their way making their platforms more luxurious, just like what Lexus did with NX for instance.

yowps3 07-09-14 08:23 AM

The LS is still built like a tank.

Very few cars left like that..

s4play 07-09-14 08:51 AM

hmmmm, I for one don't care about sales numbers in general.

Currently considering getting a late model LS, does this mean I can probably swing a really good deal on a pre-owned car? I'm thinking around $40k budget wise would that get me a nice LS for a daily?

What model years are the best for the LS to get? If I get one will probably for the the "L" model and of course it has to be white :)

The new LS460 F-sport looks amazing btw, saw one the other day and it just looks sick!


P.S. Sorry I did not read all 11 pages but saw a few jab remarks about the A8. I recently had my other Audi in for service and they gave me an A8 loaner for the week. After spending serious seat time in that car, I can tell you it's an AMAZING machine. The comfort level from the massage/heated/air cool seats to all the high tech gadgets to help you drive safely was super cool. I rarely drive cars with all this high tech stuff in luxury cars so it was quite a neat experience. The A8 is not the fastest but plenty fast for getting around town and speeding up on ramps. I got great gas mileage and the leg room in the back rivals most SUV's. I think price tag on a new A8 is around $90k and the S8 around $125k which don't make them cheap but I would hardly call them junk or garbage. Not sure I would buy one out of warranty though given all the headaches I've had with my vintage 05 s4. I can only imagine what dealers would charge to fix a problem on the A8.

The LS is a great platform and the key factor it's got over the competitors is RELIABILITY! I'm the sure LS is also expensive to fix out of warranty but at least Lexus has a better reputation for resale.

516IS 07-09-14 08:51 AM


Originally Posted by Mr. Burns (Post 8617059)
Then you add in the more obvious disadvantages like less dependability, worse long term resale value, and higher price to buy for what isn't really a better car in the first place and it's why I gave the A8 a lower score. I like to say time reveals all truths, and over and over again it has revealed that the LS is one of the best if not best cars in the segment. LS400 today over any of its rivals of the time. LS430 today over similar era S-class. LS460 today over 2006+ S-class (look how rapidly that big glorified German Chrysler has aged and depreciated). The A8 is certainly no competition in this regard. 5-6 years from now it will be another junk car no one will touch. The LS meanwhile...

^^^ This... Mr. Burns is spot on...:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup: Not only the LS but this holds true on every other Lexus model down the lineup.

GS3Tek 07-09-14 08:57 AM

<<<@!1!@>>>

Reminds me about the GS swinging pendulum commercial (fwd for the a6):D



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:37 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands