When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'd agree with you, but then I've never driven one. Did ride in a friend's GF's 07 Sebring, so it's essentially the same car. My thoughts were 'Interesting, it's a car". It's probably a decent piece of transportation equipment though. Just not appealing to me. Love the 300 though.
The 300 is an amazing car, I fail to understand how people actually buy them though, what do they see in them??
Yeah but this is the "old" one as others have stated. I had a Dodge Caliber (I think) and it was BY FAR THE WORST rental car I've ever had. Extremely peaky and thrashy engine with a wide-ratio 4-speed automatic. It was ugly, the blind spots were huge, and an absolute dog on top of everything else. Truly terrible car. The retail versions at least had a 6-speed automatic which I'm guessing would improve things, but the car still sucks.
I got a Caliber once as a rental and I remember my mom LOVED the car I always would look at the car and see if I'm missing something that my mom isn't
The 300 is an amazing car, I fail to understand how people actually buy them though, what do they see in them??
My folks bought one last summer (an 06). It's comfortable, the hemi is nothing short of awesome, looks great, and came at the right price. We picked it up in NY and drove it home to UT. It was a great trip.
dude its a low end American car. What did you expect? The 300 is a POS too.....at least compared to my LS460, and my GS350
Hey man compared to my cars the 200/300 are complete jokes.
But having said that it really isn't fair to hit on these cars because some people can ONLY afford these cars.
Unless you rented a '15, I don't understand the point of this thread.
Agreed. Its not a secret that the 2014 and below 200/Avenger were just about the worst vehicles in their segment and not competitive. Now the new 15 looks to be a different story, hope it does well for them.
Launched in a sector of talented and well-established model lineages, the all-new Chrysler 200 had to be very good to compete against rivals like the Toyota Camry or VW Passat.
ConsumerReports recently got its hands on 2.4-liter MultiAir powered version of the 200 and it seems that the car really managed to impress the road test team. They say it looks nice and distinctive; it drives well, its base power plant feels better than it does in other models, the interior is substantial and the technology is all on board.
On first impressions, then, the 200 is deemed apt to fight it out in the mid-sized sedan class, where it sits on the side of style, a space it shares with the Hyundai Sonata and the sleek-looking Fusion from Ford or Mazda6. This makes rear access a bit of a pain, but it seems to be worth it for that extra bit of elegance in the C-pillar area.
Right. IMO it should...Lincoln has the same issue, needs to look "American" and big and bold and not wavy and Asian. Just my thoughts.....
I think there would be a greater chance of a mini-300c selling well.
Agreed. As a long-time fan of Lincoln, I think they need to shape up their styling. Don't know wtf they're trying to accomplish with the waterfall grill and the stubborn refusal to build a good flagship. They could, but won't.
The 300 is beautiful. Chrysler needs a way to transfer some of that design language to the 200 without just making it a mini 300 though.
Agreed. As a long-time fan of Lincoln, I think they need to shape up their styling. Don't know wtf they're trying to accomplish with the waterfall grill and the stubborn refusal to build a good flagship. They could, but won't.
The 300 is beautiful. Chrysler needs a way to transfer some of that design language to the 200 without just making it a mini 300 though.
Doable but tough with all the "one sausage different lengths" mentality going around lately. Personally I'm curious to see what comes next from Chrysler. A new T&C Van, new CUV or that proposed 100 hatch. Either way the design language on one of those should give us an idea if it looks more fluid like the 200 or bold like the 300. Maybe a cross, who knows
dude its a low end American car. What did you expect? The 300 is a POS too.....at least compared to my LS460, and my GS350
Oh, I don't know about that. My POS 300 will show 99% of cars on here its rear lights and sure gets attention at cars and coffee
Originally Posted by dat dude
Hey man compared to my cars the 200/300 are complete jokes.
But having said that it really isn't fair to hit on these cars because some people can ONLY afford these cars.
I replaced my 335i with my 300 SRT8. I guess I am such a proletariat being parked next to an RX350 and a Corolla
They have massive engines and all but yet they're always behind the leaders.
Take the GTR for example just a 3.8L TT V6 yet it literally flies
maybe you don't remember a buick grand national (3.8L Turbo also i believe ) that also was pretty darned fast. it was no gtr on corners or in sophistication of course.
the new cadillac cts (not v-sport) has a 3.6L TT with 420 HP and 430 lb.-ft. of torque, very sophisticated active suspension, etc.
your opening statement is rather dated.
Last edited by bitkahuna; Apr 7, 2014 at 05:31 AM.