Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Audi wants to change a 45-year-old U.S. headlight rule

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-13, 07:16 AM
  #16  
Outrage
Lead Lap
 
Outrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aron9000
Yeah our headlight rules have been pretty retarded over the years. The only headlights you could put on US cars for decades were those "sealed beam" round ones, they finally allowed "square sealed beam" lights in the mid 70's, then finally in the early 80's allowed "composite" headlights(ie headlight shape designed by the manufacturer with replaceable bulbs). Useless trivia, but the 1984 Lincoln Mark VII was the first car sold in the US with new composite headlights. It was Ford that petitioned the US government to finally change the regulations.
Interestingly, the Lincoln Mark VIII was the first passenger car with HID headlights. It also used unique neon tail lights, which never really caught on due to LEDs.
Outrage is offline  
Old 04-18-13, 08:30 AM
  #17  
LexusNN
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (5)
 
LexusNN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: VA
Posts: 1,649
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Go Audi, they are on top of the game with their innovation in lighting
LexusNN is offline  
Old 04-18-13, 11:11 AM
  #18  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The new S class has some real nifty headlight tech As well.
 
Old 04-18-13, 12:19 PM
  #19  
Habious
Moderator
 
Habious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: VA
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

I'd like Audi to offer the headlights anyway, so that people like me can purchase their cars.

My personal rule -

If I think a law is stupid, I simply ignore it.
Habious is offline  
Old 04-18-13, 05:05 PM
  #20  
T0ked
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
T0ked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blueprint
The new S class has some real nifty headlight tech As well.
Apparently the real high tech headlights on the S offered in Europe also won't be coming to the US. i initially didn't know why... now I do.
T0ked is offline  
Old 04-18-13, 05:16 PM
  #21  
RXSF
Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,045
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

red turn signals are okay as long as they are LED. If they are not LED, then it is just lame. You can barely see them and you also lose a brake light
RXSF is offline  
Old 04-18-13, 08:44 PM
  #22  
MX5
Pole Position
 
MX5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: StL, MO
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RXSF
red turn signals are okay as long as they are LED. If they are not LED, then it is just lame. You can barely see them and you also lose a brake light
Totally agree. Even my wife, who is not at all a car person, rags on cars that just have 2 red lights in the back doing all the work (running lights, brake lights, turn signals). Not only does it just look cheap, like an old pickup truck, but it's crappy design in that if one bulb burns out you've lost half your rear lighting. The new Regals are terrible....they have huge rear light clusters with various elements that LOOK like there's multiple bulbs in there, but when they hit the brakes or turn signals it's just a single tiny red rectangle that actually lights up
MX5 is offline  
Old 04-18-13, 08:46 PM
  #23  
MX5
Pole Position
 
MX5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: StL, MO
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Outrage
Interestingly, the Lincoln Mark VIII was the first passenger car with HID headlights. It also used unique neon tail lights, which never really caught on due to LEDs.
I owned both Mark VII LSC (2 of em) and Mark VIII....sweet cars, as far as domestics go, and the 5.0L in the 7s sure sounded nice through Flowmasters
MX5 is offline  
Old 04-18-13, 08:49 PM
  #24  
MX5
Pole Position
 
MX5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: StL, MO
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Aron9000
Useless trivia, but the 1984 Lincoln Mark VII was the first car sold in the US with new composite headlights. It was Ford that petitioned the US government to finally change the regulations.
......yeah, and slick as the aero headlights are, thus began the never-ending battle to keep your headlights from turning yellow and/or cloudy
MX5 is offline  
Old 04-18-13, 09:08 PM
  #25  
superchan7
Lead Lap
 
superchan7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The US has some car lighting rules that are annoying at best and dangerously outdated at worst.

Enemy 1: Red rear turn signals. Severe design flaw that hampers visibility. Even the LED ones need to go as they affect the visibility of the brake lamps. Most manufacturers, including king-of-LEDs Audi, go cheap on this and just make the LED brake lamps flash on their US cars. My wife's car has the worst combination: LED brake lamps with red incandescent bulb signals. Brakes on, turn signals are useless. Ironically, it's a Honda.

Enemy 2: No side turn signal repeaters. I can't believe the US still does not require these critical turn signals. On highways, lane changing can be dangerous when two people want to move into the same lane. The trend of mirror-mounted signals is useful as they fulfill this role, and makers of large SUVs (the cars that need these the most) have been helpful to include them. Some manufacturers even figured out that stamping a US-specific fender without the hole for the signal lamps actually cuts costs (example: Accord, Camry).

Pet peeve 1: Amber front reflectors. No other country in the world requires this, so most foreign brand cars are not designed with it in mind. Then the US-market cars either get ugly reflectors in the headlamp assembly (horrible), or an extra reflector somewhere up front (not so bad as you can remove or tint them).

Pet peeve 2: Amber secondary driving lamps. I have not seen these in other countries. What in the world do these contribute to safety? If only for redundancy, then why do they need to be amber, which can affect visibility of front turn signals?

Last edited by superchan7; 04-18-13 at 09:20 PM.
superchan7 is offline  
Old 04-19-13, 05:49 AM
  #26  
Outrage
Lead Lap
 
Outrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

One could argue that, in total darkness, if you see a flashing amber light you know you're viewing the front of the vehicle. If you see a flashing red light you know you're seeing the rear of the vehicle. If both the front and rear turn signals are amber you can not determine this.
Outrage is offline  
Old 04-19-13, 05:52 AM
  #27  
Outrage
Lead Lap
 
Outrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MX5
......yeah, and slick as the aero headlights are, thus began the never-ending battle to keep your headlights from turning yellow and/or cloudy
This got worse when companies switched from glass to plastic lenses to reduce weight and save money.
Outrage is offline  
Old 04-19-13, 07:36 PM
  #28  
seanlee
Driver
 
seanlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow, like anyone actually cares.
there are tons of people mod their car light and blind everyone on the road, you think that's legal? nope. but apparently no police bother to check (speaking of which, what do they do anyways other than eating my tax money and hide in the corners for 5 mile over the speed limit).
seanlee is offline  
Old 04-22-13, 12:39 AM
  #29  
CK6Speed
Super Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
CK6Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: HI
Posts: 7,719
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Outrage
One could argue that, in total darkness, if you see a flashing amber light you know you're viewing the front of the vehicle. If you see a flashing red light you know you're seeing the rear of the vehicle. If both the front and rear turn signals are amber you can not determine this.
I would think the bright headlights or the red Taillights would give you a hint.
CK6Speed is offline  
Old 04-22-13, 06:24 AM
  #30  
mrraider
Pole Position
 
mrraider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Habious
I'd like Audi to offer the headlights anyway, so that people like me can purchase their cars.

My personal rule -

If I think a law is stupid, I simply ignore it.
I wasn't aware that the US government had such a flexible approach to law enforcement.
mrraider is offline  


Quick Reply: Audi wants to change a 45-year-old U.S. headlight rule



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:19 AM.