Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Replacing our 2001 RX300.....but with what?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 11:48 AM
  #16  
IS350jet's Avatar
IS350jet
Pole Position
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 1
From: Coral Springs, Fl
Default

The Mazda CX-9 is probably the sportiest in class, although, it's no Cayenne Turbo.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 11:50 AM
  #17  
kumquatism's Avatar
kumquatism
Lexus Test Driver
CL Folding 100,000
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 1
From: SJ CA
Default

Q5? Might be a bit too expensive though. Or a RDX would be nice if you're looking at a smaller SUV
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 11:54 AM
  #18  
J.P.'s Avatar
J.P.
Lexus Test Driver
CL Folding 100,000
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,764
Likes: 1
From: Treasury
Default

Originally Posted by caddyowner
If you're considering a Ford, the Flex is higher rated than the new Explorer. Also check out the new Edge. Reviews have been mixed, but my sister and brother-in-law have a 2011 Edge and they are very pleased with it.

Also check out the Honda Accord Crosstour (ducking) which is a much nicer vehicle than it looks.

Unless you're going to buy a new domestic vehicle, it's probably best to wait until fall / winter when the earthquake related shortages and used car price spikes have abated.
wife has awd edge and loves it, quick \ sporty \ not to big.....
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 10:35 PM
  #19  
KillaIS250's Avatar
KillaIS250
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 9,120
Likes: 10
From: 909, CA
Default

Originally Posted by AutoUnion
He wants fun


Anyways, I pick Toyota Highlander too
The new 4Runner is pretty fun actually. I'd take it over a Highlander anyday

It's a lot of fun off-road too I drive my uncle's whenever i get the chance!
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 05:36 AM
  #20  
Lexmex's Avatar
Lexmex
CL Community Team
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,331
Likes: 210
From: Miami, Florida
Default

I actually like our 2006 4Runner that we have now. Had that generation been out when I bought my RX300 (it was a few months away) I might have gotten that instead. Just a wonderful beast of a machine.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 08:37 AM
  #21  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,814
Likes: 3,999
Default

some have mentioned venza, but being basically a sedan on steroids (like one of those dodge/chrysler station wagon vehicles a few years back, edit: a magnum) and so its cargo HEIGHT is very shallow. NOTHING like a cuv/suv such as a Lexus RX. so if you need to carry anything big like furniture, a large dog crate, etc., fuggedaboudit.

i was unimpressed by venza, although the ride was nice.

Last edited by bitkahuna; Jun 23, 2011 at 09:55 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 08:46 AM
  #22  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,434
Likes: 249
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by jimxo
Our 2001 RX300 hit 150k recently and now my wife wants to get something else. We like the Toyota Highlander/Hybrid but maybe their is something more fun out there. Any suggestions under 40k


Originally Posted by bitkahuna
define fun. almost anything's more fun than a 2001 rx300.
I agree that "fun", as regards a car-purchase, needs to be defined, but I fail to see what is so unappealing about the RX series....even a 10-year-old one. In my book, it is certainly pleasant (maybe even fun) to have a nice, refined, versatile, comfortable, quiet, smooth, and reliable all-weather vehicle you can depend on day after day (I've certainly enjoyed my Outback). That defines the RX to the core.

However, if you actually do want something substantially different from an RX, I'd suggest avoiding the Highlander.....it comes from the same car-based (Camry) platform that also gives us the Highlander, RX, and Lexus ES series.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 08:51 AM
  #23  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,434
Likes: 249
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by IronCobra
I second the Venza. It retains the ride of the RX while having almost equal room, push button start, Bluetooth, Sat radio, a nice 7" Nav, camera, back up sensors, and a great look.
IMO, you can't compare the ride of a Venza with an RX. The Venza has big, relatively low-profile 19" and 20" wheels that are designed for looks and handling, not ride comfort......and, unfortunately, it shows.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 09:05 AM
  #24  
lalexusgs's Avatar
lalexusgs
Advanced
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 687
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
... In my book, it is certainly pleasant (maybe even fun) to have a nice, refined, versatile, comfortable, quiet, smooth, and reliable all-weather vehicle you can depend on day after day ...
Have to somewhat disagree with you on this. My wife also drives 2003 RX300(FWD though, not an AWD), and yes, it's a nice, refined, quiet, smooth, comfortable and all but... It's very unstable on the road. Acceleration is poor, braking is not the best, and it's very wide on turns. I mean - I never can make a U-turn anywhere, always takes me 3-point turn. Handling, especially in the rain is sometimes scary...
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 09:05 AM
  #25  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,434
Likes: 249
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

If your definition of "fun" is driving-feel and precise steering/chassis-engineering, and you want something at or below 40K, I'd suggest the BMW X3/28i, which starts at $36, 750 without options. Most of them, though will have enough options to (probably) list at 40K or a little higher....you might have to hunt a little for one under 40K. I consider BMW products to be at or among the world's best when it comes to being a "Drivers-Car", but they generally do not have the electrical-reliability or noise-isolation of an RX.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 09:10 AM
  #26  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,434
Likes: 249
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by lalexusgs
Have to somewhat disagree with you on this. My wife also drives 2003 RX300(FWD though, not an AWD), and yes, it's a nice, refined, quiet, smooth, comfortable and all but... It's very unstable on the road. Acceleration is poor, braking is not the best, and it's very wide on turns. I mean - I never can make a U-turn anywhere, always takes me 3-point turn. Handling, especially in the rain is sometimes scary...
"Unstable" meaning what? Simple sluggish acceleration and braking is not necesarily a definition of unstability. Does it wander or pull left or right while tracking down the road? That could be something as simple as wheel-alignment, a new set of tires, or replacing a bent steering/suspension piece. Also, it is more-or-less normal for high-stance vehicles like the RX (and some other SUVs) to get blown around a little in strong crosswinds.....the sides of the vehicle tend to act like wind-vanes.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 09:19 AM
  #27  
lalexusgs's Avatar
lalexusgs
Advanced
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 687
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
"Unstable" meaning what? Simple sluggish acceleration and braking is not necesarily a definition of unstability. Does it wander or pull left or right while tracking down the road? That could be something as simple as wheel-alignment, a new set of tires, or replacing a bent steering/suspension piece. Also, it is more-or-less normal for high-stance vehicles like the RX (and some other SUVs) to get blown around a little in strong crosswinds.....the sides of the vehicle tend to act like wind-vanes.
Unstable means bad cornering, shacky on turns, starts drifting even in very light rain, not confident on even simple lane changes. Replaced tires several times with several different types, numerous alignments - still the same outcome. However, I noticed the same thing with other RX300s (have 4 more RXs in family - parents and relatives)
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 09:54 AM
  #28  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,814
Likes: 3,999
Default

fwiw, had a '99 RX and toward the end of its life the engine was quite clattery and noisy. mind you, easiest 100k ever put on a vehicle, and the best as delivered quality i've ever seen (could find NOTHING wrong).
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 09:55 AM
  #29  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,814
Likes: 3,999
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I agree that "fun", as regards a car-purchase, needs to be defined, but I fail to see what is so unappealing about the RX series....even a 10-year-old one. In my book, it is certainly pleasant (maybe even fun) to have a nice, refined, versatile, comfortable, quiet, smooth, and reliable all-weather vehicle you can depend on day after day (I've certainly enjoyed my Outback). That defines the RX to the core.
well fun and appealing are two very different and subjective qualities.

However, if you actually do want something substantially different from an RX, I'd suggest avoiding the Highlander.....it comes from the same car-based (Camry) platform that also gives us the Highlander, RX, and Lexus ES series.
i agree going from rx to highlander would be like going from one brand of decent vanilla to another brand of vanilla. appealing, but not fun.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 07:26 PM
  #30  
SLegacy99's Avatar
SLegacy99
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default

I'd go Hi Hy.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jrmckinley
Car Chat
16
Dec 22, 2017 05:24 PM
kingnba6
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
13
Dec 6, 2011 01:38 AM
iloveGS300
Car Chat
15
Nov 23, 2004 10:00 AM
gs4to4
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
5
Aug 7, 2004 11:01 PM
dpaul
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
17
Apr 5, 2002 03:39 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:26 AM.