Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

MM First Impression: 2011 Ford Explorer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 09:51 AM
  #31  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,339
Likes: 237
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by <VENOM>
very nice review, glad to see your back and doing so well,
Thanks.

the explorer upgrade you talk about, was that when they removed the shifter from behind the steering wheel and moved it down below
True, but, IMO, that was mostly cosmetic. I think a far greater upgrade, functionally, was when they dumped the Twin-I-Beam front suspension for something more up-to-date. That old Twin-I-beam suspension, dating to 1964, and the questionable recommended tire-pressures on the Firestone Wilderness tires, together with some customer neglect while driving, is what led to the famous Explorer roll-over/tire-failure fiasco.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 11:52 AM
  #32  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,696
Likes: 3,940
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
Can't agree. Compared to the average vehicle progression over time, the Explorer has not changed much since it's inception. A few facelifts, the updated suspension, the addition of thirsty V8's, and two interior redesigns. But overall, the same basic package has not changed since 1990. Read most car mag review the last ten years and the Explorer usually finishes last or with low marks and comments of "outdated this, outdated that." It's lagged and been beaten by the competition in almost every catagory, save maybe for towing or off-roading. Now that's not to say it has some good attributes, but to claim it's gone through transformations over the years that brought it up to decent standards is not accurate in my opinion.
i think you're missing Ford's strategy which was to basically keep the loyal Explorer following while expanding with a number of different SUV/CUV offerings, including Escape, Expedition, Edge, and even Flex. the newest Explorer is possible due to new drivetrains, changing tastes, and mandated economy standards, although it still maintains many of the same attributes.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 11:55 AM
  #33  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,696
Likes: 3,940
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
Cannot agree. 2006-2009 is 4th generation truck/SUV known as the Explorer. All this talk about 1st gen and I-beam suspension has nothing to do with the 4th gen Explorer (2006-2010 model years) or the last 2 generations of body-on-frame/truck versions. To be more specific the 4th gen shares nothing with first 2 gens except the old block of the 4.0L V6 engine (not head which was replaced with SOHC head). The V8's are 4.6L 3 valve SOHC (not pushrod 5.0L junk) and are matched with a modern 6 speed tranny. The unique frame of the 4th gen is stiffer and stronger and is not the same as 1st, 2nd or 3rd gen frame. Suspension is fully independent and tuned like the body-on-frame Range Rovers for decent ride/handling.

In short, the 4th gen Explorer V8/6speed is competitive with any of the truck-based body-on-frame SUVs out there. Of course, the reality of the market shows that most buyers don't need all that towing capacity and offroad capability and are better off with a unibody crossover.
great post.

i got the towing package with my explorer, but haven't used it unfortunately. i'd like to get a trailer at some point though for moving stuff around my property, and for things like taking my mower in for service.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 12:51 PM
  #34  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
great post.

i got the towing package with my explorer, but haven't used it unfortunately. i'd like to get a trailer at some point though for moving stuff around my property, and for things like taking my mower in for service.
Thanks, I thought it was important that some facts were brought into the picture for those that aren't as familiar with the 4 generations of truck-based Explorers leading to the new unibody Explorer.

For most the max 5000 pound towing rating will work for doing only occasional utility trailer towing. The RV/travel trailer crowd and those hauling race cars or boats on trailers will continue to choose truck-based SUVs, of course that is a much smaller segment of SUV buyers.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 03:21 PM
  #35  
Fizzboy7's Avatar
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,992
Likes: 246
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
i think you're missing Ford's strategy which was to basically keep the loyal Explorer following while expanding with a number of different SUV/CUV offerings, including Escape, Expedition, Edge, and even Flex. the newest Explorer is possible due to new drivetrains, changing tastes, and mandated economy standards, although it still maintains many of the same attributes.
That says it well. I think I was thinking of the last Explorer as something that didn't stack up well against today's more common type of SUV (car-based). Whereas it's role was never meant to be that. Thanks for the explanation.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 05:10 PM
  #36  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,339
Likes: 237
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
2006-2009 is 4th generation truck/SUV known as the Explorer. All this talk about 1st gen and I-beam suspension has nothing to do with the 4th gen Explorer (2006-2010 model years) or the last 2 generations of body-on-frame/truck versions.
Yes, in that sense, I agree. I brought up the issue of the old Twin-I-Beam suspension basically in response to remarks about what were considered the most important Explorer updates over the years. Getting rid of the Twin-I-Beam for subsequent generation-models, IMO, was not only the right thing to do, but, as I pointed out earlier, should have been done in 1990, when the 1Gen Explorer was first introduced. That antiquated design up front contributed to the instability generated (and the tendency to roll over) when the Firestone Wilderness tires failed...usually under conditions of low tire PSI, overloaded vehicles, high speeds, and hot desert road surfaces.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 05:36 PM
  #37  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Yes, in that sense, I agree. I brought up the issue of the old Twin-I-Beam suspension basically in response to remarks about what were considered the most important Explorer updates over the years. Getting rid of the Twin-I-Beam for subsequent generation-models, IMO, was not only the right thing to do, but, as I pointed out earlier, should have been done in 1990, when the 1Gen Explorer was first introduced. That antiquated design up front contributed to the instability generated (and the tendency to roll over) when the Firestone Wilderness tires failed...usually under conditions of low tire PSI, overloaded vehicles, high speeds, and hot desert road surfaces.
Yes, I-beam front suspensions was archaic and dangerous (prone to jacking/narrowing of track when cornering, contributing to rollovers). And the shared responsibility of Ford and Firestone with the under-spec'ed tires The rest is sad automotive history for sure.

My earlier post was to provide more factual information on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th generations of the Explorer. The 3rd and 4th gen Explorers are completely different than the 1st gen for good reasons and have no common frame, suspension, wheel, tire parts and are have very different dimensions (including wheelbase and track dimensions). They are trucks (body-on-frame) of completely different designs and parts.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 06:31 PM
  #38  
<VENOM>'s Avatar
<VENOM>
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: NYC/ATL
Default

Amazing how the Explorer actually looks better then the lego style 4Runner, and 50k seems on par for a loaded Explorer, wonder if the lack of a V8 will hurt them
Reply
ClubLexus Stories

Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe

story-0

10 Lexus Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

8 Tips for Improving Your Hybrid or Plug-in Hybrid's Efficiency!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

10 Best Lexus Models No One Remembers

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

TRD Off-Road Premium: Best 2026 4Runner, Except This One Thing

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

Top 10 Lexus & Toyotas to Drive Before You Die!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Lexus/Toyotas With The LEAST 5-Year Depreciation

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Lexus LC500 Convertible Auction: A Preview of Rising Values?

 Brett Foote
story-7

GX 550 vs TX 550: Best 3-Row Luxury Lexus Family Hauler

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

9 Best Lexus Models You Can Buy for Half Price (And 1 You Shouldn't!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Lexus NX Buyer's Guide: Models, Features, Prices & More!

 Brett Foote
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 09:49 PM
  #39  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

Originally Posted by <VENOM>
Amazing how the Explorer actually looks better then the lego style 4Runner, and 50k seems on par for a loaded Explorer, wonder if the lack of a V8 will hurt them
Agreed, 4runners have always looked so-so.

btw-Toyota no longer offers a V8 in the 4runner.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mmarshall
Car Chat
28
Jul 24, 2011 09:47 AM
mmarshall
Car Chat
40
Jun 5, 2011 06:48 PM
mmarshall
Car Chat
44
Aug 4, 2010 04:42 PM
mmarshall
Car Chat
20
Jul 28, 2010 12:47 PM
LexFather
Car Chat
74
Jul 14, 2010 03:53 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:00 AM.

story-0
10 Lexus Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Some luxury cars chase trends, but these Lexus models look better now than they did when they first rolled into showrooms.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-06 17:58:29


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Tips for Improving Your Hybrid or Plug-in Hybrid's Efficiency!

Slideshow: How to Get the Best Fuel Economy with a Hybrid and Plug-In Hybrid!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-05 20:54:44


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Best Lexus Models No One Remembers

Slideshow: 10 best Lexus models no one remembers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 17:33:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
TRD Off-Road Premium: Best 2026 4Runner, Except This One Thing

Slideshow: diving into 4Runner TRD Off-Road Premium's pricing, performance, fuel economy, features, and amenities!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-23 13:09:18


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Lexus & Toyotas to Drive Before You Die!

Slideshow: the 10 Lexus and Toyota vehicles you need to drive before you die.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-23 10:34:24


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Lexus/Toyotas With The LEAST 5-Year Depreciation

Slideshow: Top 10 Lexus/Toyota models with the lowest 5-year depreciation rate.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 12:19:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lexus LC500 Convertible Auction: A Preview of Rising Values?

The LC hasn't even disappeared from the Lexus lineup yet, and we're already seeing signs of an explosive market.

By Brett Foote | 2026-04-06 09:25:02


VIEW MORE
story-7
GX 550 vs TX 550: Best 3-Row Luxury Lexus Family Hauler

Slideshow: comparing the pricings, specs, power, fuel economy, fun-factor, and features of the GX 550 Luxury+ and TX 550h+ Luxury.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-03-19 13:44:11


VIEW MORE
story-8
9 Best Lexus Models You Can Buy for Half Price (And 1 You Shouldn't!)

Slideshow: 9 best Lexus models you can buy for half price and 1 you should avoid

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-03-19 12:01:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Lexus NX Buyer's Guide: Models, Features, Prices & More!

Here's everything you need to know about the latest NX.

By Brett Foote | 2026-03-19 11:56:59


VIEW MORE