Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Honda Ridgeline may not return after 2012

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 11:08 PM
  #31  
TRDFantasy's Avatar
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
From: A better place
Default

Originally Posted by OCDetailer
Correct me if I am wrong, but isnt the tacoma still a Body On Frame design?


Honda...you can make a truck. That is not a truck. It is a refridgerator on wheels.
I would strongly argue Honda cannot make a real truck, even if they tried .

I'd like to see Honda try and make a body-on-frame truck, but they likely never will.

Originally Posted by CK6Speed
For looks wise I really don't get it though. From that side profile pic that Mike posted above, it looks like any other truck except for that slanted bed. Wasn't there another Chevy truck that had a slanted bed like that? Anyway, for Generation Two, Honda could simply give it more power, more towing capacity, slightly downsize it, and remove that slanted bed, then it would look like any other double cab truck on the road.
Yes, the Chevy Avalanche, and that is equally as ugly as the Ridgeline.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 08:49 AM
  #32  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,430
Likes: 249
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
I would strongly argue Honda cannot make a real truck, even if they tried .

I'd like to see Honda try and make a body-on-frame truck, but they likely never will.


Incorrect. The Ridgeline combines a unibody AND a truck ladder-frame. How many other pickups can say that?

See for yourself.

http://automobiles.honda.com/ridgeline/

Muscle Meets Backbone. Along with a standard complement of advanced safety systems, the Ridgeline’s first line of defense is a reinforced unit body and closed-box frame for solid crash protection.

Integrated closed-box frame
Unit-body construction
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 09:41 AM
  #33  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Incorrect. The Ridgeline combines a unibody AND a truck ladder-frame. How many other pickups can say that?

See for yourself.

http://automobiles.honda.com/ridgeline/
Incorrect, it's unibody, with an added integrated closed box frame section. It's not body-on-frame truck design despite the advertising hype. TRD Fantasy's statement was correct when he said "I'd like to see Honda try and make a body-on-frame truck, but they likely never will.".


Or per Autoweek in speculation about demise of Ridgeline:

"The Ridgeline was introduced in 2005, sharing some chassis components with the Acura MDX SUV. It is one of few unibody pickups ever made for sale in the United States, and on that count it was fairly revolutionary."

Last edited by IS-SV; Apr 13, 2010 at 10:16 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 12:10 PM
  #34  
TRDFantasy's Avatar
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
From: A better place
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Incorrect. The Ridgeline combines a unibody AND a truck ladder-frame. How many other pickups can say that?

See for yourself.

http://automobiles.honda.com/ridgeline/
Well not exactly. Like IS-SV says, it's unibody, with an added closed box frame section.

Fundamentally, a body-on-frame vehicle has the body mounted separately to the frame. A unibody vehicle like the Ridgeline has the frame and body as one unified piece.

Yes part of the Ridgeline's frame is a closed box ladder frame, but that still does not make it an actual body-on-frame vehicle, despite any hype from Honda.

I actually saw a Ridgeline unibody cut-out at a show years ago when the vehicle first came out. It is a clearly a unibody vehicle.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 03:17 PM
  #35  
CK6Speed's Avatar
CK6Speed
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,719
Likes: 4
From: HI
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
Incorrect, it's unibody, with an added integrated closed box frame section. It's not body-on-frame truck design despite the advertising hype. TRD Fantasy's statement was correct when he said "I'd like to see Honda try and make a body-on-frame truck, but they likely never will.".

Why would Honda want to build a body on frame truck though? For a light duty urban truck, I rather have the unibody and car like driving manners of the Ridgeline. Trucks drive and feel like crap. Why wouldn't anyone rather drive a car like truck if they didn't need to haul 2000 lbs of crap around? All Honda needs to do is give it more power, make is less ugly, and make it a little more affordable.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 03:28 PM
  #36  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,430
Likes: 249
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
Well not exactly. Like IS-SV says, it's unibody, with an added closed box frame section.

Fundamentally, a body-on-frame vehicle has the body mounted separately to the frame. A unibody vehicle like the Ridgeline has the frame and body as one unified piece.

Yes part of the Ridgeline's frame is a closed box ladder frame, but that still does not make it an actual body-on-frame vehicle, despite any hype from Honda.

I actually saw a Ridgeline unibody cut-out at a show years ago when the vehicle first came out. It is a clearly a unibody vehicle.


Originally Posted by IS-SV
Incorrect, it's unibody, with an added integrated closed box frame section. It's not body-on-frame truck design despite the advertising hype. TRD Fantasy's statement was correct when he said "I'd like to see Honda try and make a body-on-frame truck, but they likely never will.".

WE all three agree that it combines elements of both. I did not say that the two were necessarily separate. My point was that no other pickup on the market has that type of design, because it is expensive to do. For that, I don't think the Ridgeline deserves criticism.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 03:32 PM
  #37  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

Originally Posted by CK6Speed
Why would Honda want to build a body on frame truck though? For a light duty urban truck, I rather have the unibody and car like driving manners of the Ridgeline. Trucks drive and feel like crap. Why wouldn't anyone rather drive a car like truck if they didn't need to haul 2000 lbs of crap around? All Honda needs to do is give it more power, make is less ugly, and make it a little more affordable.
That's exactly why crossover SUVs sell well and have been successful for Honda and many companies. The market for light duty urban truck generates low sales, which is what the Ridgeline has proven.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 03:33 PM
  #38  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
WE all three agree that it combines elements of both. I did not say that the two were necessarily separate. My point was that no other pickup on the market has that type of design, because it is expensive to do. For that, I don't think the Ridgeline deserves criticism.
Yes, elements of both, we all agree for sure.

My point, in relation to his statement he was not "incorrect".
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 03:37 PM
  #39  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
That's exactly why crossover SUVs sell well and have been successful for Honda and many companies. The market for light duty urban truck generates low sales, which is what the Ridgeline has proven.
Yup. Chris is onto something but Honda seems to be hell bent on doing ugly, slow and old. If it wasn't as ugly with a MPG increase and an interior more car like than GM 1980s it could possibly do better.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 03:40 PM
  #40  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Yup. Chris is onto something but Honda seems to be hell bent on doing ugly, slow and old. If it wasn't as ugly with a MPG increase and an interior more car like than GM 1980s it could possibly do better.
This afflictions unfortunately seem to more common with Honda/Acura (ugly, slow, old/dated technology, mediocre MPG).
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 04:01 PM
  #41  
TRDFantasy's Avatar
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
From: A better place
Default

Originally Posted by CK6Speed
Why would Honda want to build a body on frame truck though? For a light duty urban truck, I rather have the unibody and car like driving manners of the Ridgeline. Trucks drive and feel like crap. Why wouldn't anyone rather drive a car like truck if they didn't need to haul 2000 lbs of crap around? All Honda needs to do is give it more power, make is less ugly, and make it a little more affordable.
To get better sales, and market share, and respect? Just some thoughts.

My point was, even IF Honda wanted to, I have serious doubts they'd actually be able to make a competitive body-on-frame truck. Of course we will never know unless Honda actually does decide to make a body-on-frame truck.

Originally Posted by mmarshall
WE all three agree that it combines elements of both. I did not say that the two were necessarily separate. My point was that no other pickup on the market has that type of design, because it is expensive to do. For that, I don't think the Ridgeline deserves criticism.
I see your point. I don't think anyone is criticizing that aspect of the Ridgeline. Yes, it is a rather unique way that Honda approached the Ridgeline's chassis/platform, and it is an expensive approach. However, that does not mean it's the right approach for the market.

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Yup. Chris is onto something but Honda seems to be hell bent on doing ugly, slow and old. If it wasn't as ugly with a MPG increase and an interior more car like than GM 1980s it could possibly do better.
That's a lot of "ifs" .
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 05:10 PM
  #42  
(Cj)'s Avatar
(Cj)
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
From: somewhere out there
Default

Originally Posted by CK6Speed
Why would Honda want to build a body on frame truck though? For a light duty urban truck, I rather have the unibody and car like driving manners of the Ridgeline. Trucks drive and feel like crap. Why wouldn't anyone rather drive a car like truck if they didn't need to haul 2000 lbs of crap around? All Honda needs to do is give it more power, make is less ugly, and make it a little more affordable.
I agree that the price is what killed the Ridgeline. It it good in concept and the refreshed model looks leagues better than the pre-refresh 1st gen model.

Honda should have probably offered a stripped down (DX?) model with (gasp) FWD, and marketed it as an affordable family hauler. Getting the price closer to family car pricing (ie $20K) would have made it a nice option for families that want Home Depot utility but don't need to tow or haul.

I'm not saying doing those things would make the Ridgleline "successful", but it wouldn't be in the demised state that it's in now. It should have never ever been marketed as a work truck even a little. It should have had a soccerdad commercial with him picking up a fridge from Lowes or something. I don't care if the Ridgeline was in the Baja, it's a joke to classic truck types. It should have strickly been a family alternative vehicle.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 05:34 PM
  #43  
caddyowner's Avatar
caddyowner
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,810
Likes: 15
From: MI
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
Yes, elements of both, we all agree for sure...
I thought we were talking about the Ridgeline, not the Toaster?

(Sorry, couldn't resist.)
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 06:33 PM
  #44  
un4given's Avatar
un4given
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Good! I won't be missing the POS
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 06:34 PM
  #45  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

Originally Posted by caddyowner
I thought we were talking about the Ridgeline, not the Toaster?

(Sorry, couldn't resist.)
If that was the case I would have posted a pic of my Cusinart.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:37 AM.