Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

996 turbo or 997 s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 04:43 PM
  #16  
pvmike1's Avatar
pvmike1
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 5
From: California
Default

At $50k, I'd be looking at 996tt's with the x50 package.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 08:30 PM
  #17  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

A Porsche warranty needs to be considered seriously for those without large cash reserves. Checkup on the IMS failure rate for these cars.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 08:41 PM
  #18  
flipspeed's Avatar
flipspeed
Thread Starter
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

so i went to see the 997 s today. as far as exterior goes 997>996. then i sat in the car and the interior completely blows away the 996. the car i saw was loaded with nav and the sport chrono package. but with that said, the 996 turbo is not a bad looking car inside and out. regular 996 cars look too bland but those side scoops and the wider rear with the retractable spoiler make all the difference in the world. i think the 996 turbo looks badass and the 997 s looks exotic with all those curves. cant really go wrong with either car; they both have their strengths and weakness. i'll let finances dictate which car i'll choose.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #19  
flipspeed's Avatar
flipspeed
Thread Starter
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

just to compare the two on paper (motortrend):


2005 Porsche 911 Carrera S
Base price $79,895
Price as tested $90,000
Vehicle layout Rear engine, RWD, 4-pass, 2-door coupe
Engine 3.8L/355-hp/295 lb-ft 24-valve flat-6
Transmission 6-speed manual
Curb weight (f/r dist) 3298 lb (38/62%)
Wheelbase 92.5 in
Length x Width x Height 175.6 x 71.2 x 51.2 in
0-60 mph, sec 4.3 sec
Quarter Mile 12.6 sec @ 112.3
Braking, 60-0 mph 104 ft
Lateral Acceleration 0.98 g avg

2001 Porsche 911 Turbo
Base curb weight, lb 3395 (manual)/3494 (Tiptronic)
Weight distribution, f/r, % 40/60 (est.)
Cargo capacity, cu ft 3.5
Fuel capacity, gal 16.9
Weight/power ratio, lb/hp 8.1:1 (manual)

PERFORMANCE*
Acceleration, sec Tiptronic Manual
0-60 mph 3.8 3.6
0-100 mph 9.2
Standing quarter mile, sec/mph 11.9/116.0
Top speed 189
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 12:06 PM
  #20  
UberNoob's Avatar
UberNoob
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,231
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles/Vancouver
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
on looks i FAR prefer the 997s over the 996 turbo. and 996 turbo is INSANELY fast, basically ridiculous on public roads. over 100 in 3rd is EASY. 997s is PLENTY powerful enough!
+1

and N-A 911 always gets preference from me
not that i dislike turbos

also newer car might has more creature comfort features built-in
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 09:24 PM
  #21  
Coffey454's Avatar
Coffey454
Rookie
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default

We have a 996 Turbo that we use for track days and summer time daily driving. It has 110k miles on it now and it still runs great. It is extremely fast....
997 is a much "nicer" car, interior is better and styling is corrected. Performance wise, the Turbo can't be beat, and when driven gently even gets good mileage! For my $ the 996 Turbo is one of the best performance values available right now and they are very durable cars even when abused. Either way you"re getting a Porsche so there is no bad decision.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mavericck
Car Chat
4
Nov 29, 2006 11:43 AM
Dohc3l
SC400 / 300 Classifieds
1
Apr 19, 2004 02:10 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:10 PM.