Review: 2009 Corvette C6 Coupe

I didn't say it was not "up to par". It certainly is better than past Corvette power-steering systems. It's just that, while good, it's not quite at BMW standards for tactile feel and response...and you, of course, as a longtime BMW owner, I'm sure, know what those standards are. While the Corvette steering system is nice, you're just not going to fling it around corners quite as agily as a Miata or S2000, most likely because of the big heavy engine up front.
Last edited by mmarshall; Jan 6, 2009 at 07:50 AM.

By "favorite", do you mean the C6 in general, or the base-coupe model? The lower-line models, of course, aren't going to storm around a track quite like the ZR-1, but then again, they are a far better bargain, especially for street use. You won't have to cough up six-figures and get in a waiting line to get one.
I know I disappointed some people who wanted the Z06 and ZR-1, but getting one of them long enough was too much of a hassle.The GT-R, of course, as you note, is another world-class track stormer, but you will, in general, run into more or less the same problems and expenses getting one as a ZR-1.
I agree with you on one thing, though. I'd love to get my hands on the people who cheapened out and decontented the new Forester and, to a lesser extent, Impreza. They yanked far more out of those vehicles than they put back in with new features....the new ones don't even have a temperature gauge any more for the coolant. The list of decontenting on the new Forester, in addition to that, is endless. One of the worst is that you now have to buy the cargo area pull-cover as an dealer-accessory...it is no longer standard.
Last edited by mmarshall; Jan 6, 2009 at 07:53 AM.
Great review, you keep giving me/us more cars to consider

I plan to review a new Camaro (preferably an SS) whenever they become available....I've already done the Mustang GT and Dodge Challenger R/T, though the Mustang is one of my older, shorter ones without images. https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...-gt-coupe.html
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...enger-r-t.html
Shelbys? Probably not....they're too hard to get, though I won't turn down the opportunity if I get one.
I'm surprised to hear the service manager say that the 'Vettes at his dealership are some of the most reliable cars he sees. While it is, granted, a far better car than its predecessors, according to a number of sources, especially Consumer Reports, Corvettes are still somewhat troublesome. Buicks, in general, tend to be the most reliable GM-badged cars, and, of course, the Toyota-sourced Pontiac Vibe.
Last edited by mmarshall; Jan 6, 2009 at 08:23 AM.

By "favorite", do you mean the C6 in general, or the base-coupe model? The lower-line models, of course, aren't going to storm around a track quite like the ZR-1, but then again, they are a far better bargain, especially for street use. You won't have to cough up six-figures and get in a waiting line to get one.
And put low miles on??? I want a beast I can daily drive, then destroy through the twisties and track, and then drive happily home with nary an issue... hence the IS-F has risen to the top.
Or am I dreaming such a car exists...
Russ
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Or am I dreaming such a car exists...
Russ
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...exus-is-f.html
If you test-drive an IS-F though, check it carefully (with the proper tire pressure) on rough roads (you'll probably find some potholes and frost-heaves on the typical WI road). The IS-F is a nice sport sedan, but it has a harsh rear suspension that tends to toss the car up and down like a porpoise over bumps and heaves. You may find (as I did) that the suspension on this car is just too much, unless you keep it on smooth roads..
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...exus-is-f.html
If you test-drive an IS-F though, check it carefully (with the proper tire pressure) on rough roads (you'll probably find some potholes and frost-heaves on the typical WI road). The IS-F is a nice sport sedan, but it has a harsh rear suspension that tends to toss the car up and down like a porpoise over bumps and heaves. You may find (as I did) that the suspension on this car is just too much, unless you keep it on smooth roads..
Last edited by rdgdawg; Jan 6, 2009 at 08:58 AM.
I visited the dealership to check out the vette and I also was impressed by the interior improvement over the older models.
Visually, it doesn't look as good as it feels.
My biggest complaint was legroom. Wasn't enough for me.
In person, vettes are bigger than they look in pics or at a distance. All that girth has to have a negative effect somewhere.
Still, it's a car I would love to have.
Thanks again.

Something about the Corvette that whenever I see one I always smile, especially if its the newer C6 ones
I'm glad you picked a base model as that would be the one I'd be most interested in if I were to ever purchase one. I was glad read that the quality of the interior and clutch are up a notch. I know I have always liked the looks on the outside, but have been left cold once sitting in one.
Looking forward to the new Camaro tho, I think if it has the right interior (quality) and driving dynamics Chevy could have a real 1 - 2 punch on their hands!
Last edited by mmarshall; Jan 6, 2009 at 10:58 AM.

Visually, it doesn't look as good as it feels.
But you are correct. What you get, with the new interior, is generally better than what you see.
Did you have the power-operated, bottom seat cushion back all the way? One of the things I mentioned in the review was the awkward manual seat-back rake adjuster that didn't allow as much bolt-uprightness to the seatback as I like.....in a 2-seater car like a 'Vette, with the cargo area right behind the seats, the upper seat-back angle position, if too low, can also restrict how far back the bottom cushion will go, restricting legroom. That's one of the things I don't like about classic two-seaters....they can be hard to get the seats right.
Last edited by mmarshall; Jan 6, 2009 at 11:17 AM.












