LS vs S class
By the way, I recall seeing a figure chart in an Autobild magazine a long time ago about the current S class. Over 50% of S classes sold in Europe are the efficient S320 CDI models. That I clearly remember. What I also clearly remember is that the S600, S63 and S65 AMG make up less than 2% of all S classes sold in Europe. Again, these are low volume production models when you look at the big picture.
And how can Lexus hybrids be marketed as performance cars when they're extremely overweight and as a result suffer a handling penalty? This means that they're only going to perform well in a straight-line. And you know what? The typical Lexus customer does not strike me as someone who likes to madly accelerate in a straight-line. Back home, most of my family friends who own Lexus cars are the "dignified and polite" types. I suspect they drive their Lexus the way the act - in a dignified, elegant and relaxed manor. Hardly the crowd that would enjoy mashing the pedal of a "performance hybrid".
The whole way Lexus markets their hybrids doesn't make sense to me at all. First there's the talk about great gas mileage. Then when that didn't work out, all of a sudden they're performance cars? Huh? What? I'm sorry, but I just don't get it. If Lexus wanted to introduce fuel-efficient vehicles, then they need to simply offer smaller engines and perhaps diesels.
The blame should lie with the American public for being, oh, I don't know, NARROW MINDED in some cases. Our car magazines have a habit of emphasizing performance above all else, especially in luxury cars. The way it is over-emphasized is almost unhealthy. People, without seemingly thinking too much, seem to expect that luxury cars are powered by large and powerful engines. These days, a smaller, efficient engine can offer you a high degree of fun and performance and good gas mileage. Do you agree with this?
Then again, wastefulness is part of our, yes our, the American culture, sadly.
Again, the new S-class and C-class are too new to tell their long-term reliability. All I know is Lexus is ahead of Mercedes-Benz in the latest reports by J.D. Power in terms of long-term reliability. I could only tell by brand, not any particular model, because I don't have the information to tell.
Valid points and a well-written post.
I like the new twist you added to the argument about hybrids and V12's being "gimmicks". Makes complete sense as nobody needs them. Both companies just tell us that we do.
Another major factor is that a used W126 S class in the US can be had for very little money. People know that they're durable and well-made and thus often buy them as beater or project cars. And a beater car will obviously not be very well taken care off. So when you see an old W126 S class on the street which looks like it has been through hell, don't assume that it's because of a quality issue. More likely it's the owner. An LS400 going through the same ordeal will fare no better. Even the best-built cars eventually succumb to poor treatment.
Here in Stuttgart, I see plenty of gasoline W126 S classes (diesels were not sold in Europe) that are in great shape and look like they just left the factory. The W126 is a car known for its durability. We had an early 1980s 300SD Turbodiesel in our family. If it had not been stolen, my parents would probably still be driving it today or at least keep it as a second car.
By the way, I recall seeing a figure chart in an Autobild magazine a long time ago about the current S class. Over 50% of S classes sold in Europe are the efficient S320 CDI models. That I clearly remember. What I also clearly remember is that the S600, S63 and S65 AMG make up less than 2% of all S classes sold in Europe. Again, these are low volume production models when you look at the big picture.
And how can Lexus hybrids be marketed as performance cars when they're extremely overweight and as a result suffer a handling penalty? This means that they're only going to perform well in a straight-line. And you know what? The typical Lexus customer does not strike me as someone who likes to madly accelerate in a straight-line. Back home, most of my family friends who own Lexus cars are the "dignified and polite" types. I suspect they drive their Lexus the way the act - in a dignified, elegant and relaxed manor. Hardly the crowd that would enjoy mashing the pedal of a "performance hybrid".
Considering Lexus hybrids sell better in EUROPE than in AMERICA, they clearly are seen as something special there. The Lexus hybrids offer acceleration comparbable to a bigger engines vehicle with fuel economy of a smaller engine vehicle. Their passing power if pretty much unsurpassed unless you have a Enzo. You underestimate the Lexus crowd, just looking at this forum as an example. There are Lexus black sheep
We can sterotype any brand any way.
The whole way Lexus markets their hybrids doesn't make sense to me at all. First there's the talk about great gas mileage. Then when that didn't work out, all of a sudden they're performance cars? Huh? What? I'm sorry, but I just don't get it. If Lexus wanted to introduce fuel-efficient vehicles, then they need to simply offer smaller engines and perhaps diesels.
They are marketed as giving more to the driver and more to the environment. We have talked about their purpose and strategy, even I don't agree with all their moves. However people do want them, they sell out production in their limited quantitites. The next hybrid will offer more economy than performance. It is confusing to people as when people to this day think "Hybrid" they think Prius and then they think fuel efficiency, NOT performance. So Lexus has their work cut out for them.
The point is, people want to put the Germans on some high almighty pedestal which is fine. However, lets point out their "economy" cars and hatchbacks and mini cars Lexus does not compete in. Imagine if Lexus sold those types of cars! People would scream "REBADGES YARIS" over and over. Again, Lexus is 4th best selling in the world with only 1 4 cylinder in its history, the IS 220d. That is quite a feat.
I am an American (working in Germany). Explain to me how a V8 is "proper" for a luxury car? Europeans can live with 4-cylinders or smaller 6-cylinder motors in their luxury cars, so can the rest of the world. Even in Japan, one of the most image-conscious markets in the world, 4- and 6-cylinder luxury cars from Europe do extremely well. European luxury cars with 4-cylinder engines are still appealing and desired luxury cars throughout the world. They have the brand heritage and resulting prestige and offering a 4-cylinder won't change that. Keep in mind that outside of the US people tend to consider what and how much they need. A BMW 520i is more appealing than a 535i for someone living in Tokyo for example.
Europe/Japan is more concerned about image than we are. In Japan, German cars sell b/c they are German first and foremost and provide status over a Lexus. The market is different since Europe has had high gas prices, high license fees, more tolls, taxes and emissions fees than we do. We are simply spoiled here, even with $4.00 gas.
If there was no status with a V-8, then the GErmans would have been selling us THE SAME cars Europe has instead of selecting only the large engines cars for us. We are their biggest V-8 and AMG/M markets!

Are you serious? Why should we blame the German companies for something that they cannot control? They tried selling their lower-engined models in this country many years ago and it didn't work. The American market wasn't ready or didn't understand the point of a smaller, more efficient motor powering a luxury car. Gas was still cheap and nobody foresaw the need for more efficient motors.
Efficient or rather crude and outmatched by the Japanese engines for a lower price? Why get a 4 cylinder 320 in the 1990s when u could have gotten a V-6 ES for example? Again, Lexus never sold 4 cylinders here. Germans decided to then bring 6s here only to compete better with the cheaper Japanese and also technology made them more efficient. Its not like 4 cylinders were not selling, the 318ti hatch might not have sold but others did sell.
The blame should lie with the American public for being, oh, I don't know, NARROW MINDED in some cases. Our car magazines have a habit of emphasizing performance above all else, especially in luxury cars. The way it is over-emphasized is almost unhealthy. People, without seemingly thinking too much, seem to expect that luxury cars are powered by large and powerful engines. These days, a smaller, efficient engine can offer you a high degree of fun and performance and good gas mileage. Do you agree with this?
And Europe/Japan is not even more narrow minded? They are less accepting of the non status quo than we are. Euro mags put performance and image above anything else, far above our magazines. In recent years, our American mags have been influenced by the growing popularity of Euro mags and shows here.
I do agree with you 100% that a smaller car and more efficient car can indeed be more fun. Many times, its about the "funniest time around the track, not the fastest time around it".

Then again, wastefulness is part of our, yes our, the American culture, sadly.
We can sterotype any brand any way.
And for the record, my former 136-hp Mercedes C200 CDI (base model in Europe) had excellent passing power on the autobahn at speeds that would cost you your license back in the US.
The only people who would seriously make these Toyota-Lexus comparisons are Lexus-haters. And I suppose in their insane state-of-mind they do have a slight point. The best-selling Lexus cars in the US are the Lexus RX and Lexus ES. The RX is a rebadged Toyota Harrier while the ES is based on the Camry platform I believe. This gives the haters fuel to add to the fire, especially the older Lexus, which, pardon my word usage here, were shamelessly rebadged Toyotas from Japan.
Don't misunderstand me. Toyota and Lexus are good companies but for Lexus to be taken more seriously globally they need to really distance themselves from Toyota. In todays world information like this spreads like the speed of light thanks to electronic communication (internet etc.). There are many sensitive people out there, I imagine, that can't live with a Lexus because there's too close a relationship to Toyota cars. The new Landcruiser for example shares the same seat configuration buttons as the LS460/LS600h. I personally am not offended by this, but some folks are.
I like Lexus a lot, but I like to be objective too. Lexus is a young brand and in my honest opinion they can learn many things from their rivals, just like their rivals learned many things from them.
If there was no status with a V-8, then the GErmans would have been selling us THE SAME cars Europe has instead of selecting only the large engines cars for us. We are their biggest V-8 and AMG/M markets!
I hope we're not at war here.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Plus keep in mind that there are many luxury Toyota models outside N.American that are as luxurious or more luxurious than the Lexus IS and GS that does not count as Lexus sales just because of branding. Many Toyota brand sedans like the Crown & SUV's and minivan are being sold at luxury car price range in many parts of the world & those do not contribute to Lexus sales. Even in the U.S., some SUV's & vans sold under the Toyota brand are higher priced than some of the "luxury brand" models.
OTOH, Mecedes, BMW and Audi are selling many cars worldwide that would have fallen below the "luxury brand" price range(~below US$30K) here had they been selling those exact low-sec. cars in N.America (A, B-class, low-spec 1 & 3 series, etc.)That's why comparing Lexus world wide sales with those of the European brands is not an apples to apples comparison.
Plus keep in mind that there are many luxury Toyota models outside N.American that are as luxurious or more luxurious than the Lexus IS and GS that does not count as Lexus sales just because of branding. Many Toyota brand sedans like the Crown & SUV's and minivan are being sold at luxury car price range in many parts of the world & those do not contribute to Lexus sales. Even in the U.S., some SUV's & vans sold under the Toyota brand are higher priced than some of the "luxury brand" models.

However, cars like the 1 series, A3 or A/B classes are considered premium in Europe and globally. They're not cheap to begin with and they come better-equipped than comparable cars in the mainstream class below them. My girlfriends parents for instance drive a Mercedes B class. I am not sure which model it is but it is a gasoline model. I've ridden in it a couple of times and it actually spacious and very comfortable and the motor sounds very smooth and refined. In a way, these are expectations that luxury buyers have and the B class fulfills them. I suspect the A3 and 1 series do the same.
And again, the bulk of Lexus sales are still in the US whereas the European marques are spread out more evenly across the globe. Brings another "Can Lexus really be compared to these brands?" argument to the table because they're essentially still relying on one major market for the bulk of their sales.
To claim "hybrid performance" credentials only makes sense within the context of what the car is competing against... (A contemporary V6 Camry would be a performance car 20 years ago!) The LS600h has no performance advantages over a cheaper S550... and few over the cheaper LS460... its economy advantages are small and overstated... so what are you getting for all the extra money then? AWD? Otherwise you can get most of the comforts in a fully packaged LS460...
I am not hating on the LS600h. It is a very luxurious car and I liked it when comparing it to the S600. To state though that it is comparable to its V!2 competitors in performance or substantive fuel efficiency is a misrepresentation. If Lexus had toned down their "comparable to a V12" marketing and called it the LS500h they would have been more honest. The hybrid technology is distinctive enough to stand on its own merits.
Chris

Toyota is currently selling approx.~9 million cars world wide, which is much greater than any of the other "luxury brands"(not more than about 1.5 million or below).
If they really want to play this number game, all Toyota has to do is to take a look at their non-Lexus Toyota models, take all the most expensive models whose combined sales exceed 2 million worldwide, & then rebrand all of them as Lexus.
Then Lexus would be the #1 selling luxury brand in the world & much more widely distributed all over the world.
I doubt they will care about doing that though. They will just be taking sales from Toyota & giving them to Lexus.
But the Toyota brand will still have millions of world wide sales left even after this switch, mostly consisting of their lower end models.
Last edited by Gojirra99; Sep 10, 2008 at 09:11 AM.
Id still take the ls460, take the 10K I saved and use it for some 21" and a nice drop and call it a day. Lexus is just more reliable.
I don't know about current 07 to present benz models but the ones up to 06 have very poor quality materials and construction. My relative has a 05 e class and I tell ya, my 01 ls430 is built much better with better materials.
benz has great design team and great 3 pointed star, other than that I wouldn't touch one out of factory warranty.







