Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

2010 Acura RL Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #76  
-J-P-L-'s Avatar
-J-P-L-
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
You guys also believe in the tooth fairy, unicorns and Star Wars REALLY will happen.

Seriously, I can take your same posts today, match them with posts from 5-10 years ago and you are singing the same old tired song.

Stop reasoning/rationalizing/defending and let it go. Take a deep breathe, drink some prune juice, let the brand go.

They don't seem to care about you, so why care about them?

Lexus when they have failed or done poorly, doesn't send us the next that is identical to the last, or WORSE than the last so it can FAIL again.

Look at the GS. First gen was 6 cylinder only, big and long an failed. Did they send us another GS with only a 6 cylinder and some marketing B.S? NOPE. THey brought the 2GS which shocked the segment and now the 3GS has evolved with Hybrids, 8 speed autos, etc.

Lets look at the IS 300. Again, after the first couple years, a sales miss. Did Lexus send us the IS 250 only, and then say "oh, its truly better than the IS 300" and lie to us? HELL NO. We got the IS 250, IS 300 in the middle east, IS 220d in Europe, IS 350 most everywhere and now IS-F.

In Comparison, Acura sends us basically dud after dud b/c they know Honda fanbois will buy them irregardless once the marketing spin is expceptional.

See the difference? Its actually pretty easily spelled out over the past 18 years.

Acura is full of crap. They blamed the RSX for image issues and it offers a 4 clinder. What do thaty do after it? Bring us a 4 cylinder TSX, a 4 cylinder SUV (with turbo) and Canada has a Civic rebadge.

Good day to you all!

Even though Acura uses different ingredients in their product line (no RWD, no V-8, ect...) doesn't mean failure. The RL is a supurb car (fails $20K more expensive than a BMW 5-series which cost the same for example). So it doesn't have a V-8. Well 300 HP seems more than adequete and it is FAST!

The current TL was a major success even though sales have recently lessoned during the end of this product cycle. For a few years, it was 3rd only to the 3-series and C-class in sales for it's segment.

The current MDX is the best SUV I've ever driven (and I've driven almost all of them) - perfect interior, excellent handling, great styling.

The RDX does indeed have a 4-banger, but it is neck snapping fast. That turbo makes it just as fast if not faster than my 8-cylinder SC400! And it's an SUV!


So Acura doesn't play by the same product planning rules of Lexus, BMW, and MB. Does it really matter that much?
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 06:25 PM
  #77  
TRDFantasy's Avatar
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
From: A better place
Default

Originally Posted by JLSC4
So Acura doesn't play by the same product planning rules of Lexus, BMW, and MB. Does it really matter that much?
The problem is, yes it does matter. Acura owners and Acura fans have asked for RWD and V8 engines for years and Acura has ignored that.

TSX owners have been asking for more power from the base engine, and Acura with the new TSX hasn't given us that.

Acura can continue to ignore the market, ignore customers, and continue playing by it's own rules but it does so at it's own peril. I guess it doesn't matter that much for the competition as it makes it easier for the competition if Acura continues making strange or bad decisions.

Yes the RDX is fast, but it's also small and it guzzles gas. For a small SUV like that, it's unacceptable.

It's not enough to offer value-packed or good products. In the luxury market, to be taken seriously, you need to be unique, innovative, and class leading in at least some ways to be taken seriously.

You know Acura has a problem when the TL is most cross-shopped with the Accord.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 08:54 PM
  #78  
Nextourer's Avatar
Nextourer
Lexus Champion
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 3
From: none
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
The problem is, yes it does matter. Acura owners and Acura fans have asked for RWD and V8 engines for years and Acura has ignored that.

TSX owners have been asking for more power from the base engine, and Acura with the new TSX hasn't given us that.

Acura can continue to ignore the market, ignore customers, and continue playing by it's own rules but it does so at it's own peril. I guess it doesn't matter that much for the competition as it makes it easier for the competition if Acura continues making strange or bad decisions.

Yes the RDX is fast, but it's also small and it guzzles gas. For a small SUV like that, it's unacceptable.

It's not enough to offer value-packed or good products. In the luxury market, to be taken seriously, you need to be unique, innovative, and class leading in at least some ways to be taken seriously.

You know Acura has a problem when the TL is most cross-shopped with the Accord.
Yep. hp went down and torque went up (a rarity for a Honda vehicle).

The RDX.. I like its design but I think they're really pushing the turbo marketing spin. I was thinking the same thing. The 1G Murano with the 3.5 litre V6 and a CVT got similar or better mileage than the RDX with the 2.3 litre turbo. What gives?
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 08:57 PM
  #79  
Nextourer's Avatar
Nextourer
Lexus Champion
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 3
From: none
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Acura is full of crap. They blamed the RSX for image issues and it offers a 4 clinder. What do thaty do after it? Bring us a 4 cylinder TSX, a 4 cylinder SUV (with turbo) and Canada has a Civic rebadge.

Good day to you all!
The real problem started when they got too cocky and replaced the Integra name with the RSX. They claimed people were saying "I drive an Integra" rather than "I drive an Acura" and Acura wanted owners to feel proud they were driving an Acura (heard from Jim Kenzie Motoring 2002).

Well guess what? They drive an Acura now... not an Integra.

Any company would die for an iconic car whose name is synonymous with the company. People know what an Integra is. People know what an M3 is. You don't have to say it's a BMW. The same way you don't have to tell people your Integra is an Acura. Yet Acura didn't like it.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #80  
rominl's Avatar
rominl
exclusive matchup
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 81,854
Likes: 445
From: Lovely OC
Default

overall i think it's pretty obvious about acura's failure, and a lot of people can point out their shortcomings over the years. their lineup now is simply weak, that's for sure. hopefully in another 2 yrs they can do something right and get back in the game, otherwise, honestly they might as well focus on making a better accord
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 11:54 PM
  #81  
encore888's Avatar
encore888
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,695
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default

And let's not forget, they still are the #2 Japanese luxury brand selling in the U.S.; what they have is an image problem, but their bread-and-butter TL sales are keeping things going. If they can fix the RL/Legend that will help things. They definitely should do that before the NSX.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 12:27 AM
  #82  
GFerg's Avatar
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian
CL Folding 25,000
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,397
Likes: 100
From: What is G?
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy

You know Acura has a problem when the TL is most cross-shopped with the Accord.
Damn, thats crazy you said that. I literally just had a conversation with my good friend whos a sales manager for an Acura dealership who said the same exact thing.

And I quote "Its crazy, we dont even compete with BMW, Lexus, or MB anymore. The majority of our trade ins are Hondas, Toyotas, Hyundais, and Mazdas." They used to get in a lot of Audi's, BMW's and Lexus models at this particular dealership. And obviously everyone is downgrading to smaller cars (one guy going from a RL to a Civic).
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 08:47 PM
  #83  
TRDFantasy's Avatar
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
From: A better place
Default

Originally Posted by encore888
And let's not forget, they still are the #2 Japanese luxury brand selling in the U.S.; what they have is an image problem, but their bread-and-butter TL sales are keeping things going. If they can fix the RL/Legend that will help things. They definitely should do that before the NSX.
#2 Japanese luxury brand in the US, but there are only 3 Japanese luxury brands. The more worrying thing is the sales trend. Acura sales are on a decline.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 07:26 AM
  #84  
-J-P-L-'s Avatar
-J-P-L-
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
... The more worrying thing is the sales trend. Acura sales are on a decline.
Because all three of their sedans are about 5 years old and ready to be replaced. I've never seen a company's sales go up at the same time that their lineup ages.

Last edited by -J-P-L-; Mar 23, 2008 at 11:28 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 07:36 AM
  #85  
gsCrazy's Avatar
gsCrazy
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

honda is really falling behind with their front wheel drive bias, mediocre performance and their lack of a super car (or even the development of one) to showcase the advancements Acura has developed. Also, the lack of a car that shines in its class is also not doing much for its name.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 11:27 AM
  #86  
-J-P-L-'s Avatar
-J-P-L-
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by gsCrazy
honda is really falling behind with their front wheel drive bias, mediocre performance and their lack of a super car (or even the development of one)...
After the new TL comes out this coming year, Acura will only have ONE FWD car, the TSX - and even that may have an AWD version. Everything will be AWD rather than RWD which many people don't want.

So why are they still being criticised for FWD??

Oh, and the NSX (a supercar) IS in development and will be out within a couple of years.

And how can 300HP be considered "mediocre"? Wait until gas is $4-$5/gal and let's see how many 400 and 500HP cars we'll see.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LexFather
Car Chat
15
Apr 26, 2009 10:49 PM
Overclocker
Car Chat
18
Jun 18, 2008 09:24 PM
XeroK00L
Car Chat
8
Jul 24, 2007 12:20 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:05 AM.