Before the E63 AMG there was the 300E AMG Hammer
01-24-08, 06:47 AM
#1
Before the E63 AMG there was the 300E AMG Hammer
Just wanted to pay homage to this wonderful machine that paved the way for super saloons. I recall the Car & Driver issue back in the day with this car on the cover..Those old enough to remember should recall this beast.
The 1988 300E AMG Hammer!
/mercedes_300e_amg_hammer1.jpg)
The 1988 300E AMG Hammer!
One day, back when AMG was not an official arm of Mercedes, Hans-Werner Aufrecht and Erhard Melcher (the A and M, respectively, in AMG - the G stands for Aufrecht's birthplace, Grossaspach) came up with the most sensational car AMG had ever built…and it was a sedan! Certainly, AMG had built fast cars before, but the Hammer blew practically everything that year (that would be 1986) into the weeds.
At the time, a 3.0-litre 177-hp 6-cylinder 300E would have set you back $39,000. For a cool $17,000, AMG would replace that 3-litre unit with the 5.5-litre V8 from the 560SEC and add 32-valve cylinder heads and twin camshafts. That conversion was good for 360 hp DIN in Europe (slightly less in North America due to emission regulations) but as of 1988, if you wanted the Hammer of Hammers, you'd pop for an additional $39,950 and AMG technicians would bore out the 5.6-litre unit to 6.0-litres and 375 hp DIN. A further $33,302 bought you a different rear differential, Gleason-Torsen LSD, stronger rear sub frame and a host of other chassis mods. Figure about another $14,170 for the AMG suspension, 17 inch chrome wheels and tires, an interior package and aerodynamic body kit (including painting and mounting) and, of course, don't forget about the $18,000 labour charge, and the grand total would be smooth $161,422. What a nice accounting lesson. And remember, folks, this was back in 1988!
*Note that the test numbers achieved using a detuned 6.0-litre US spec car (approx. 350-360hp) running a taller, optional 2.24:1 final drive.
What you'd get for your money was an exceptionally quick and stable sedan. It's not quite as smooth-riding as the 300E that spawned it, but with twice the power and Ferrari GTO performance, who really cares? In 2004 the Hammer's performance is impressive, but in the late 80s, when even Porsche's range-topping 928 S4 would be swept aside in a straight line, it was truly brutal. This is not to say that the Hammer itself was brutal. In fact, despite its name and all the intimidating numbers, its smooth power delivery and well-tuned chassis made the Hammer a very confidence-inspiring drive.
So there you have the Hammer. Almost makes you wish it was 1988 all over again, doesn't it?
At the time, a 3.0-litre 177-hp 6-cylinder 300E would have set you back $39,000. For a cool $17,000, AMG would replace that 3-litre unit with the 5.5-litre V8 from the 560SEC and add 32-valve cylinder heads and twin camshafts. That conversion was good for 360 hp DIN in Europe (slightly less in North America due to emission regulations) but as of 1988, if you wanted the Hammer of Hammers, you'd pop for an additional $39,950 and AMG technicians would bore out the 5.6-litre unit to 6.0-litres and 375 hp DIN. A further $33,302 bought you a different rear differential, Gleason-Torsen LSD, stronger rear sub frame and a host of other chassis mods. Figure about another $14,170 for the AMG suspension, 17 inch chrome wheels and tires, an interior package and aerodynamic body kit (including painting and mounting) and, of course, don't forget about the $18,000 labour charge, and the grand total would be smooth $161,422. What a nice accounting lesson. And remember, folks, this was back in 1988!
*Note that the test numbers achieved using a detuned 6.0-litre US spec car (approx. 350-360hp) running a taller, optional 2.24:1 final drive.
What you'd get for your money was an exceptionally quick and stable sedan. It's not quite as smooth-riding as the 300E that spawned it, but with twice the power and Ferrari GTO performance, who really cares? In 2004 the Hammer's performance is impressive, but in the late 80s, when even Porsche's range-topping 928 S4 would be swept aside in a straight line, it was truly brutal. This is not to say that the Hammer itself was brutal. In fact, despite its name and all the intimidating numbers, its smooth power delivery and well-tuned chassis made the Hammer a very confidence-inspiring drive.
So there you have the Hammer. Almost makes you wish it was 1988 all over again, doesn't it?
01-24-08, 08:00 AM
#5
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We had a E320 of that model in 1994 with no bugs or issues. That is hands down the best E class ever built. Does anyone remember http://youtube.com/watch?v=ovfO6_D5XvA&feature=related this E class?
01-24-08, 08:30 AM
#6
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
How fast is that Hammer?
01-24-08, 10:50 AM
#7
http://www.fantasycars.com/sedans/HT...mmer_w124.html
0-60 in 5.4sec
1/4 in 13.6@109
That's the stats for the 375hp/407ftlbs model for the oversea market.
Seems like theres traction issues. 109mph trap but with a 13.6 ET.
0-60 in 5.4sec
1/4 in 13.6@109
That's the stats for the 375hp/407ftlbs model for the oversea market.
Seems like theres traction issues. 109mph trap but with a 13.6 ET.
Trending Topics
This car has a nice stance too..
01-24-08, 03:46 PM
#12
Lexus Champion
I remember the Hammer. One magazine cover page the Hammer and the RUF Yellowbird as two of fastest coupe and the fastest 4 doors saloon back then. I think the Yellowbird top speed at 213 mph and 0-60 was less than 4 seconds.
