Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Edmunds Full Test: 2008 Sequioa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 06:20 PM
  #16  
Nextourer's Avatar
Nextourer
Lexus Champion
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 3
From: none
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
6.7 sec is the 5.7 tundra engine, oddily enough the bigger engine makes better mileage than the smaller one
The 5.7 litre is lighter and has dual VVT-i plus a 6-spd.

The 4.7L is the UR engine and is heavier and only has VVT-i on the exhaust side and a 5-spd.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 11:52 PM
  #17  
TJW98LS's Avatar
TJW98LS
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,596
Likes: 8
From: Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by Nextourer
The 5.7 litre is lighter and has dual VVT-i plus a 6-spd.

The 4.7L is the UR engine and is heavier and only has VVT-i on the exhaust side and a 5-spd.
Wow, that's terrible for the 4.7L. Yea they need to work on that wieght difference.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 03:54 AM
  #18  
MR_F1's Avatar
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by TJW98LS
Wow, that's terrible for the 4.7L. Yea they need to work on that wieght difference.
yeah, its an older iron block engine.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 06:44 AM
  #19  
MPLexus301's Avatar
MPLexus301
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,044
Likes: 1
From: Friend Zone
Default

They need to replace the 4.7L with like a 5.0L variant of the 5.7L making around 310HP with dual vvti and the 6AT.

4.7L is not really competitive anymore, and sucks gas.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 08:08 AM
  #20  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20,240
Likes: 274
Default

Originally Posted by MPLexus301
They need to replace the 4.7L with like a 5.0L variant of the 5.7L making around 310HP with dual vvti and the 6AT.

4.7L is not really competitive anymore, and sucks gas.
why? if you want 5.7 get 5.7.

They left cheaper option - if they just lowered the size of the engine to 5.0 it wouldnt be much cheaper :-).
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 08:29 AM
  #21  
GFerg's Avatar
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian
CL Folding 25,000
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,397
Likes: 100
From: What is G?
Default

Good review, but not surprising. Its not like the Tundra tested bad in magazine reviews either. I've seen a few on the road already. Nice SUV.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 10:17 AM
  #22  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,511
Likes: 261
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

I won't be able to comment further without seeing and examining the vehicle for myself, but right off-hand, from the pictures, it looks like Toyota, once again, used too much of that El Cheapo, poorly-finished, silver plastic on the dash and console. The interior quality and materials in its pickup stablemate, the Tundra, is awful.

I'll look at it next week at the Washington, D.C. Auto Show and see if I still feel the same way.

Last edited by mmarshall; Jan 21, 2008 at 10:20 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #23  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That thing is just huge....
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 10:36 AM
  #24  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,511
Likes: 261
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
That thing is just huge....
Huge, I guess, is a relative term. It's probably no bigger than domestic full-size SUV's like the Tahoe and Expedition.....and appears to be smaller than the extended-wheelbase Suburban, Expedition EL, Yukon XL, etc...
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 10:47 AM
  #25  
rominl's Avatar
rominl
exclusive matchup
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 81,876
Likes: 472
From: Lovely OC
Default

haven't test driven the car yet. can't say i like the exterior (probably prefer previous one more), but i like the interior a lot
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 10:49 AM
  #26  
MPLexus301's Avatar
MPLexus301
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,044
Likes: 1
From: Friend Zone
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
why? if you want 5.7 get 5.7.

They left cheaper option - if they just lowered the size of the engine to 5.0 it wouldnt be much cheaper :-).
The 4.7 is an older engine and yes, there is a better option which is the 5.7 and it's only like $1500 more expensive than the base V8 in most configurations. That said, there is no reason it shouldn't still be a good option with upgraded vvti and a 6AT. Honestly the 4.7 has a low horsepower rating but its not horrible...I think that the upgrades I suggested would simply help fuel economy and these days every little bit helps.

I'm also fairly certain that some sort of update will happen for this engine, as the 4Runner and GX are slated to get it next year and I cannot see Toyota carrying over the 4.7L as-is.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 01:42 PM
  #27  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20,240
Likes: 274
Default

Originally Posted by MPLexus301
The 4.7 is an older engine and yes, there is a better option which is the 5.7 and it's only like $1500 more expensive than the base V8 in most configurations. That said, there is no reason it shouldn't still be a good option with upgraded vvti and a 6AT. Honestly the 4.7 has a low horsepower rating but its not horrible...I think that the upgrades I suggested would simply help fuel economy and these days every little bit helps.

I'm also fairly certain that some sort of update will happen for this engine, as the 4Runner and GX are slated to get it next year and I cannot see Toyota carrying over the 4.7L as-is.
4.7 already got the upgrades for this duty...
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 04:38 PM
  #28  
MR_F1's Avatar
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by MPLexus301
The 4.7 is an older engine and yes, there is a better option which is the 5.7 and it's only like $1500 more expensive than the base V8 in most configurations. That said, there is no reason it shouldn't still be a good option with upgraded vvti and a 6AT. Honestly the 4.7 has a low horsepower rating but its not horrible...I think that the upgrades I suggested would simply help fuel economy and these days every little bit helps.

I'm also fairly certain that some sort of update will happen for this engine, as the 4Runner and GX are slated to get it next year and I cannot see Toyota carrying over the 4.7L as-is.
Exactly. All alloy block, vvt-ie, direct injection.
Should be good for 300hp and better economy than the 5.7
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 05:56 PM
  #29  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,853
Likes: 4,021
Default

Originally Posted by rominl
i like the interior a lot
Man Henry I think your standards are dropping! The acre of silver colored plastic is ugly and you'll need the arms of a praying mantis to reach that nav screen.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 07:30 PM
  #30  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,511
Likes: 261
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by blacksc400
I wanna read mmarshall 's review!
OK......but I've got several other CL-member review requests on the list right now, too. I'll add the new Sequoia when it becomes available in my area.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:38 PM.