When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I won't be able to comment further without seeing and examining the vehicle for myself, but right off-hand, from the pictures, it looks like Toyota, once again, used too much of that El Cheapo, poorly-finished, silver plastic on the dash and console. The interior quality and materials in its pickup stablemate, the Tundra, is awful.
I'll look at it next week at the Washington, D.C. Auto Show and see if I still feel the same way.
Last edited by mmarshall; Jan 21, 2008 at 10:20 AM.
Huge, I guess, is a relative term. It's probably no bigger than domestic full-size SUV's like the Tahoe and Expedition.....and appears to be smaller than the extended-wheelbase Suburban, Expedition EL, Yukon XL, etc...
They left cheaper option - if they just lowered the size of the engine to 5.0 it wouldnt be much cheaper :-).
The 4.7 is an older engine and yes, there is a better option which is the 5.7 and it's only like $1500 more expensive than the base V8 in most configurations. That said, there is no reason it shouldn't still be a good option with upgraded vvti and a 6AT. Honestly the 4.7 has a low horsepower rating but its not horrible...I think that the upgrades I suggested would simply help fuel economy and these days every little bit helps.
I'm also fairly certain that some sort of update will happen for this engine, as the 4Runner and GX are slated to get it next year and I cannot see Toyota carrying over the 4.7L as-is.
The 4.7 is an older engine and yes, there is a better option which is the 5.7 and it's only like $1500 more expensive than the base V8 in most configurations. That said, there is no reason it shouldn't still be a good option with upgraded vvti and a 6AT. Honestly the 4.7 has a low horsepower rating but its not horrible...I think that the upgrades I suggested would simply help fuel economy and these days every little bit helps.
I'm also fairly certain that some sort of update will happen for this engine, as the 4Runner and GX are slated to get it next year and I cannot see Toyota carrying over the 4.7L as-is.
The 4.7 is an older engine and yes, there is a better option which is the 5.7 and it's only like $1500 more expensive than the base V8 in most configurations. That said, there is no reason it shouldn't still be a good option with upgraded vvti and a 6AT. Honestly the 4.7 has a low horsepower rating but its not horrible...I think that the upgrades I suggested would simply help fuel economy and these days every little bit helps.
I'm also fairly certain that some sort of update will happen for this engine, as the 4Runner and GX are slated to get it next year and I cannot see Toyota carrying over the 4.7L as-is.
Exactly. All alloy block, vvt-ie, direct injection.
Should be good for 300hp and better economy than the 5.7
Man Henry I think your standards are dropping! The acre of silver colored plastic is ugly and you'll need the arms of a praying mantis to reach that nav screen.
OK......but I've got several other CL-member review requests on the list right now, too. I'll add the new Sequoia when it becomes available in my area.