Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Front Wheel Drive and Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #16  
whoster's Avatar
whoster
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,350
Likes: 1
From: Inside
Default

Originally Posted by ST430
FWD performance vehicle will still be legitimate....how?

Not more horsepower, but instead less weight....horsepower/weight still dictactes the overall winner typically...

Keep also in mind The Integra Type R's would dominate SCCA/BTCC racing against the likes of more powerful Bimmer's, Audi's etc. in its day....
i think the problem today with reducing weight is that given today's safety standards and ginormous SUVs, cars need the weight for reinforcing bars, impact beams, etc. etc. Yes, we all know how crucial of a role weight plays in performance and fuel economy, but with safety standards climbing higher but cars not getting any smaller--it's really not possible to reduce weight without dramatically increasing cost.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 01:37 PM
  #17  
IS350jet's Avatar
IS350jet
Thread Starter
Pole Position
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 1
From: Coral Springs, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by whoster
i think the problem today with reducing weight is that given today's safety standards and ginormous SUVs, cars need the weight for reinforcing bars, impact beams, etc. etc. Yes, we all know how crucial of a role weight plays in performance and fuel economy, but with safety standards climbing higher but cars not getting any smaller--it's really not possible to reduce weight without dramatically increasing cost.
This is a very good point. Manufacturers are stuck in this cycle where they've figured out how to make big, powerful engines more fuel efficient while moving more weight around. Where does it stop? Are we going to see 6,000 lb. Mazdas with 550 HP that gets 30 MPG in ten years? Let's go the other way around. Using todays technology in fuel efficiency, what would be wrong with a car that had 200 HP, weighed 2,000 lbs, did 0-60 in under 6 seconds and got 45 MPG?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 02:18 PM
  #18  
ST430's Avatar
ST430
Pole Position
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 212
From: Silicon Valley
Default

Originally Posted by whoster
i think the problem today with reducing weight is that given today's safety standards and ginormous SUVs, cars need the weight for reinforcing bars, impact beams, etc. etc. Yes, we all know how crucial of a role weight plays in performance and fuel economy, but with safety standards climbing higher but cars not getting any smaller--it's really not possible to reduce weight without dramatically increasing cost.
\

there's a lot of ways to save weight without affecting safety:

- reciprocating weight (lighter wheels)
- unsprung (brakes/suspension/etc)
- engine / battery / spare tire (or fix-a-flats) reduction
- seats / al hood/trunk/roof

myriad of stuff to do that isn't that expensive....
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 05:31 PM
  #19  
blacksc400's Avatar
blacksc400
Car Chat Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,146
Likes: 2
From: Las Vegas!
Default

oh well, I don;t drive FWD anymore...
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 07:46 PM
  #20  
whoster's Avatar
whoster
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,350
Likes: 1
From: Inside
Default

Originally Posted by ST430
\

there's a lot of ways to save weight without affecting safety:

- reciprocating weight (lighter wheels)
- unsprung (brakes/suspension/etc)
- engine / battery / spare tire (or fix-a-flats) reduction
- seats / al hood/trunk/roof

myriad of stuff to do that isn't that expensive....


lighter wheels means forged wheels...which cost more
unsprung weight means lighter alloys in components....which cost more
you'd really want run-flats after how crappy they are compared to regular tires?
and once again about lighter seats, aluminum hood/etc...these all cost more

F430 Scuderia > standard F430
Gallardo Superleggera > standard Gallardo
911 GT3 > Carrera S

they're all "lighter & tighter" stock vehicles that have slightly power increase and weight saving plans. that cost much more than their standard counterparts.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 07:47 PM
  #21  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,208
Likes: 220
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by Koma
I agree. All cars should be lightened up if possible in my opinion. Better fuel savings, better handling, etc.
To an extent, fine...........but remember, all else equal (and you can't escape the laws of physics here) less weight means less ride comfort, less stability on the road, and less crashworthiness in an accident. I, for one, don't want to get to the point where cars are like cardboard boxes.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 08:01 PM
  #22  
Koma's Avatar
Koma
Moderator
CL Folding 25,000
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 1
From: Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
To an extent, fine...........but remember, all else equal (and you can't escape the laws of physics here) less weight means less ride comfort, less stability on the road, and less crashworthiness in an accident. I, for one, don't want to get to the point where cars are like cardboard boxes.
Well we have laws for that to keep cars from being killing machines.

Originally Posted by whoster
lighter wheels means forged wheels...which cost more
unsprung weight means lighter alloys in components....which cost more
you'd really want run-flats after how crappy they are compared to regular tires?
and once again about lighter seats, aluminum hood/etc...these all cost more

F430 Scuderia > standard F430
Gallardo Superleggera > standard Gallardo
911 GT3 > Carrera S

they're all "lighter & tighter" stock vehicles that have slightly power increase and weight saving plans. that cost much more than their standard counterparts.
Run-flats actually weigh more but he was talking about a can of fix-a-flat.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 04:37 AM
  #23  
IS350jet's Avatar
IS350jet
Thread Starter
Pole Position
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 1
From: Coral Springs, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by whoster
lighter wheels means forged wheels...which cost more
unsprung weight means lighter alloys in components....which cost more
you'd really want run-flats after how crappy they are compared to regular tires?
and once again about lighter seats, aluminum hood/etc...these all cost more

F430 Scuderia > standard F430
Gallardo Superleggera > standard Gallardo
911 GT3 > Carrera S

they're all "lighter & tighter" stock vehicles that have slightly power increase and weight saving plans. that cost much more than their standard counterparts.
Yes, but we're talking about ordinary cars, here, not super cars. We're also talking about spending more R&D dollars on weight savings INSTEAD of engine performance technology. Like I said earlier in this thread, Manufacturers don't care how heavy their cars get because they've figured out how to move them around with big, powerful, fuel efficient engines. The only problem in this line of thinking is that handling suffers. Pretty soon, manufacturers won't care if their best selling, mid-sized sedan, weighs more than 7,000 lbs because they've figured out how to get 500 HP out of the engine and still meet federal fuel mileage regulations. Where will it stop?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 05:23 AM
  #24  
llamaboiz's Avatar
llamaboiz
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11,030
Likes: 7
From: Windward, Oahu
Default

I just love my is350, its my... my... precious...

*need i say more?*
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 07:11 AM
  #25  
GSteg's Avatar
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 81
From: CA
Default

We're almost at the point where if you want to reduce weight while keeping all those gizmos and gadgets, then we're going to have to resort to more exotic materials.

The body and engine are mostly made up of aluminum already. Dumping those power seats will save a lot of weight, but then you'll be losing luxury.

Take your existing car right now and try to lighten it up by 300lbs without losing any luxury feature. If you manage to take out 300lbs, you'll most likely be using some sort of expensive/lightweight material. Now unless there is a very very large demand for lighter cars, manufactors will keep on adding power while increasing weight because they know horsepower is one of the factor that sells cars.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 07:59 AM
  #26  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,208
Likes: 220
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by Koma
Well we have laws for that to keep cars from being killing machines.


Yes, that's true, but civil laws and Federal Safety requirements can't overrule the laws of physics. You can only pare down automotive weight so far without compromising safety. I don't care how many air bags, door beams, crush-zones, etc..... you stick on a Chevy Aveo. Run an Aveo head-on into a Suburban, or let it be T-Boned by one, and I can guarantee you which one of the two vehicles....and its occupants.....will come out second-best.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 08:17 AM
  #27  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

To reduce weight, we just need to keep off the electronic crap. All those computers add weight and complexity.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 09:01 AM
  #28  
LexBob2's Avatar
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,473
Likes: 247
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
To reduce weight, we just need to keep off the electronic crap. All those computers add weight and complexity.
Yup, electronics, options and ammenities have added to the weight of cars along with all of the safety gear.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
krava
GS - 4th Gen (2013-2020)
23
Sep 7, 2021 02:05 PM
PhilipMSPT
Car Chat
24
Mar 24, 2011 03:48 PM
SaintNexus
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
43
Oct 18, 2010 09:12 AM
vader11
Car Chat
25
Nov 6, 2006 02:37 PM
idg
GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011)
22
Feb 17, 2005 07:18 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:06 AM.