Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Consumer Reports: Avoid the Current-Generation Ford Explorer.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-23, 09:42 AM
  #16  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,196
Received 2,287 Likes on 1,491 Posts
Default

from the horse's mouth:

https://www.consumerreports.org/cars...2/reliability/

We expect the 2023 Explorer will be much less reliable than the average new car. This prediction is based on data from 2020, 2021 and 2022 models.
the latest gen was released in 2020 and clearly they had issues out of the gate. so basing their prediction in part on the year it came out is flawed, because car makers can and do make continuous improvements.

bitkahuna is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 10:55 AM
  #17  
xjokerz
Racer
 
xjokerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: WA
Posts: 1,535
Received 69 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
I think it’s fair. I rented one for a week one time and I was very underwhelming.

My first car was an Explorer, so I really want to like it
The first generation was the best in its history, since my mom has owned one for the last 25 years. Lol
xjokerz is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 11:04 AM
  #18  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,304
Received 2,657 Likes on 1,904 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xjokerz
The first generation was the best in its history, since my mom has owned one for the last 25 years. Lol
Mine was a 95, so the refresh. Big issue was transmissions, those transmissions were really weak. Mine had to be rebuilt at about 60,000 miles.

Mine looked just like this one:

SW17LS is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 11:12 AM
  #19  
xjokerz
Racer
 
xjokerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: WA
Posts: 1,535
Received 69 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Mine was a 95, so the refresh. Big issue was transmissions, those transmissions were really weak. Mine had to be rebuilt at about 60,000 miles.

Mine looked just like this one:

Those wheels are pretty neat.


My mom's is a 96 red XLT. It has 165,000 miles and everything seems to work just fine except the rear windows don't roll down and the battery gauge no longer works correctly. Transmission seems to shift just fine and I honestly can't tell you if she's ever had the fluid changed out. Probably too late because I hear if you do that too late in a car's life span, it can start slipping.

She barely drives anymore though, like maybe 1,000 miles a year. The thing is a major gas hog and of course it's going to get even less than it did back in the day when it was new due to all the wear and tear.
xjokerz is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 11:14 AM
  #20  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,852
Received 85 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
what does "one out of five" even mean?
Typically, it refers to the bottom 20%.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 11:16 AM
  #21  
Margate330
Lexus Test Driver
 
Margate330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: FL
Posts: 6,594
Received 948 Likes on 753 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
CR likes to make shrill claims, especially against makers other than toyota.

this site gives the explorer average reliability.

https://repairpal.com/reliability/ford/explorer

from that link:



does that sound like a 1 out of 5 nightmare?
No, not really. lol

I bought my old Explorer around 30-40l miles and drive it to approx 80k(if I remember) miles before I traded it.
Didn't spend a penny or do anything to it but tires and oil changes.

I think it was running the V-6.
I'd like a new one.
Margate330 is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 11:17 AM
  #22  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,852
Received 85 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
from the horse's mouth:

https://www.consumerreports.org/cars...2/reliability/



the latest gen was released in 2020 and clearly they had issues out of the gate. so basing their prediction in part on the year it came out is flawed, because car makers can and do make continuous improvements.

True, but CR did not just take one year of data...usually, predictions for 2023 models would include data up through 2022, assuming enough samples of that year had been sold to have an adequate database.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 11:20 AM
  #23  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,852
Received 85 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Margate330
Or, maybe they like Ford Explorers. lol
Trade it in for a new one, problem solved. lol
Maybe, maybe not. The problem won't be sold if they get another lemon. I learned that lesson many years ago, in the late 70s and early 80s, with domestically-designed Chrysler products....I got two lemons and a third partial-lemon.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 11:23 AM
  #24  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,852
Received 85 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Mine looked just like this one:

With the monochrome paint and running-boards, looks like a top-line Limited trim-version. The Limiteds and Eddie Bauers were considered the top of the rung.

Did you get stuck with those defective Firestone Wilderness tires? Ford made the tire-failure problem even worse by dropping the tire-PSIs from 30 to 26 PSI. Owners were complaining about a stiff, trucky ride, so Ford took the cheap, easy way out and just made the tires softer, not paying enough attention to what would happen of they were overloaded in high-temperature and high-speed conditions.

Last edited by mmarshall; 06-11-23 at 11:27 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 11:40 AM
  #25  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,852
Received 85 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Just released today....June 11. Class-Action lawsuit on 2020+ Explorers......rear subframe/axle-bolt failure.

https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2...-lawsuit.shtml
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 12:34 PM
  #26  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,196
Received 2,287 Likes on 1,491 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
True, but CR did not just take one year of data...usually, predictions for 2023 models would include data up through 2022, assuming enough samples of that year had been sold to have an adequate database.
and i quoted that very thing (from them), they used 2020, 2021, and 2022 surveys to 'predict' 2023. of course if any of those years was horrendous it will hugely skew any prediction. i don't have access to CR but can you see if 2022 ACTUALS for example is better than 2020?
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 01:28 PM
  #27  
jer
Instructor
 
jer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: fl
Posts: 867
Received 93 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
from the horse's mouth:

https://www.consumerreports.org/cars...2/reliability/



the latest gen was released in 2020 and clearly they had issues out of the gate. so basing their prediction in part on the year it came out is flawed, because car makers can and do make continuous improvements.
Unfortunately, FMC is known for not making continuous improvements on their vehicles until a new version is released, unlike other manufacturers. Others make improvements even during current model runs, Ford tends to 'wait'. Why, is anyone's guess.
jer is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 02:10 PM
  #28  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,852
Received 85 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jer
Unfortunately, FMC is known for not making continuous improvements on their vehicles until a new version is released, unlike other manufacturers. Others make improvements even during current model runs, Ford tends to 'wait'. Why, is anyone's guess.
Ford has a history of doing that. The most famous case, of course, is probably the Pinto of the early '70s......management approved the release of the 1971 Pinto with a known hazard (warned of by the engineers) of having the fuel tank outboard of the rearmost frame rail...with virtually no protection at all in a rear-impact. Ford management figured that the cost of any lawsuit-settlements would be less than the cost of revising the design.There was also the issue of keeping the car's weight down to 2000 lbs. empty....a revised frame or gas tank location would have exceeded that. The rest, of course, is history.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 03:39 PM
  #29  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,304
Received 2,657 Likes on 1,904 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xjokerz
Those wheels are pretty neat.
They were a nightmare to clean though!

My mom's is a 96 red XLT. It has 165,000 miles and everything seems to work just fine except the rear windows don't roll down and the battery gauge no longer works correctly. Transmission seems to shift just fine and I honestly can't tell you if she's ever had the fluid changed out. Probably too late because I hear if you do that too late in a car's life span, it can start slipping.

She barely drives anymore though, like maybe 1,000 miles a year. The thing is a major gas hog and of course it's going to get even less than it did back in the day when it was new due to all the wear and tear.
We had that Explorer in the family until a few years ago, it had 225,000 miles on it. All in all it was a good truck.

Originally Posted by mmarshall
With the monochrome paint and running-boards, looks like a top-line Limited trim-version. The Limiteds and Eddie Bauers were considered the top of the rung.

Did you get stuck with those defective Firestone Wilderness tires? Ford made the tire-failure problem even worse by dropping the tire-PSIs from 30 to 26 PSI. Owners were complaining about a stiff, trucky ride, so Ford took the cheap, easy way out and just made the tires softer, not paying enough attention to what would happen of they were overloaded in high-temperature and high-speed conditions.
Yep, it was a Limited. Mine never had Firestone tires (the problematic tires were the Firestone Radial ATX not the Wilderness AT), it came with Goodyear Wranglers.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 06-11-23, 04:02 PM
  #30  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,852
Received 85 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Mine never had Firestone tires (the problematic tires were the Firestone Radial ATX not the Wilderness AT), it came with Goodyear Wranglers.
According to the NHTSA, it was the Wilderness ATs that were giving most of the trouble.

(This is a pdf file, so it will download into your hard-drive)

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...mukeI5KGuCpfi4
mmarshall is offline  


Quick Reply: Consumer Reports: Avoid the Current-Generation Ford Explorer.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:00 PM.