SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Need help plz! Decisions! Na-t q

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-15, 10:21 PM
  #1  
bakersc95
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
bakersc95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: California
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Need help plz! Decisions! Na-t q

I am about to purchase my second sc300. as far as cosmetics and upgrades it is perfect for what im looking for. my first sc300 was turbo charged a few years ago with a pretty solid kit from Extreme Turbo Systems and i am contemplating dropping the motor from my first sc300 which has 160k with the turbo kit into the sc im about to purchase.

my questions are,

1. how difficult would it be to drop the na-t motor into the sc im about to purchase?

2. would i b better off doing the modifications to install the turbo kit from my first sc300 into the new sc?

Thank you for your time!
All help is GREATLY appreciated!
Attached Thumbnails Need help plz! Decisions! Na-t q-img_0007.jpg  
Old 04-21-15, 01:01 AM
  #2  
Kris9884
Racer
iTrader: (7)
 
Kris9884's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OR
Posts: 1,805
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Well that depends on your skill level and available tools. Assuming both motors are OBD1 I would just keep whichever motor is in better shape and less miles. Tell us more about the setup and the 2 cars.
Old 04-21-15, 07:45 AM
  #3  
bakersc95
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
bakersc95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: California
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I'm not the most skilled mechanic for starters. Lol . I have a mechanic I lined up to do the work and he is comfortable working with turbos and swapping engines. The lower mileage is the one with the turbo kit but I've had it since I was sixteen and drove it like a jackass . Both cars are automatic. The sc I'm about to purcHase (92 sc300) has "240k" but the engine and transmission have been replaced and some point in time. Specifics I do not know as far as when . So I guess health of the engines could go either way. The reason I want to move the na-t setup into the other sc is because the body has the 97+ oem body , new pearl painjob, supra brake setup , mint interior and lots of small mods here and there.



Both are obd1 too!
Old 04-21-15, 07:48 AM
  #4  
bakersc95
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
bakersc95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: California
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Also the sc300 I'm about to get already has decent CX coil overs and rims
Old 04-21-15, 07:54 AM
  #5  
bakersc95
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
bakersc95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: California
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's the sc I'm looking to get http://losangeles.craigslist.org/sgv...977637663.html
Old 04-21-15, 07:18 PM
  #6  
TXMAG
Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
TXMAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Texas!
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I'd probably run a compression test on the "new" SC and see what the results are. Assuming it looks OK, I think it would be easier and cheaper just to swap the NA-T setup onto the new car if the engine and transmission are in good shape, versus doing a couple of motor swaps and still having to tweak some wiring/plumbing.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sheridan
Build Threads
3
03-07-18 10:08 AM
trini9227
Performance & Maintenance
3
09-06-10 01:27 PM
Lanceezy
Performance & Maintenance
4
10-14-09 09:46 AM
gdc5ind
Performance & Maintenance
18
09-01-07 11:03 AM
1992 SC300
Performance & Maintenance
17
02-13-07 10:15 PM



Quick Reply: Need help plz! Decisions! Na-t q



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:36 AM.