Road Race Motorsports Piggy back dyno test
06-02-15, 04:30 PM
#46
UPDATE: I'll be doing "after" dyno pulls tomorrow at 10am. I currently have 185 miles on the tune. I will post exact miles during dyno tomorrow. Unfortunately I did use the tank of gas that was in the car for the first runs. But I filled up at the same gas station, even same pump.
So tomorrow is the day of truth, stay tuned guys
So tomorrow is the day of truth, stay tuned guys
Hopefully they're positive.
06-03-15, 10:45 AM
#52
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
Can admin move the post from Iaobo979 to the thread dicussing the RRM system. I want my thread to be based off actual dyno run and controlled enviroments. Not gossip or "what ifs"
06-03-15, 12:10 PM
#53
ok, that isn't so bad, actually.
Again from here
I plugged in values of
87.6 deg F
28.66 in Hg
43% relative Humidity.
That gives a relative HP of 94.3
The original relative HP was 98.5 (70 deg, 28.9", 32%)
So the original was 248.4/0.985=252.2 HP
Now is 254.4/0.943=269.8
So a corrected increase of 17.6 HP
If I misused that calculator, please point out my mistake.
Again from here
I plugged in values of
87.6 deg F
28.66 in Hg
43% relative Humidity.
That gives a relative HP of 94.3
The original relative HP was 98.5 (70 deg, 28.9", 32%)
So the original was 248.4/0.985=252.2 HP
Now is 254.4/0.943=269.8
So a corrected increase of 17.6 HP
If I misused that calculator, please point out my mistake.
06-03-15, 02:17 PM
#54
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WA
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok, that isn't so bad, actually.
Again from here
I plugged in values of
87.6 deg F
28.66 in Hg
43% relative Humidity.
That gives a relative HP of 94.3
The original relative HP was 98.5 (70 deg, 28.9", 32%)
So the original was 248.4/0.985=252.2 HP
Now is 254.4/0.943=269.8
So a corrected increase of 17.6 HP
If I misused that calculator, please point out my mistake.
Again from here
I plugged in values of
87.6 deg F
28.66 in Hg
43% relative Humidity.
That gives a relative HP of 94.3
The original relative HP was 98.5 (70 deg, 28.9", 32%)
So the original was 248.4/0.985=252.2 HP
Now is 254.4/0.943=269.8
So a corrected increase of 17.6 HP
If I misused that calculator, please point out my mistake.
06-03-15, 02:18 PM
#55
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
ok, that isn't so bad, actually.
Again from here
I plugged in values of
87.6 deg F
28.66 in Hg
43% relative Humidity.
That gives a relative HP of 94.3
The original relative HP was 98.5 (70 deg, 28.9", 32%)
So the original was 248.4/0.985=252.2 HP
Now is 254.4/0.943=269.8
So a corrected increase of 17.6 HP
If I misused that calculator, please point out my mistake.
Again from here
I plugged in values of
87.6 deg F
28.66 in Hg
43% relative Humidity.
That gives a relative HP of 94.3
The original relative HP was 98.5 (70 deg, 28.9", 32%)
So the original was 248.4/0.985=252.2 HP
Now is 254.4/0.943=269.8
So a corrected increase of 17.6 HP
If I misused that calculator, please point out my mistake.
I also know little about how dyno's correct so if you want, i can get you uncorrected numbers for before and after.
06-03-15, 05:26 PM
#57
I hate dynos that plot graphs via the speed (mph); needs to be rpms! Love that the HP continues to climb even at the rev limit.
Besides the SARD ecu, has there been anything else in the market that can raise the rev limiter? I feel there's some additional ponies to be had in the higher rpms that are being stifled by the limiter.
Besides the SARD ecu, has there been anything else in the market that can raise the rev limiter? I feel there's some additional ponies to be had in the higher rpms that are being stifled by the limiter.
06-03-15, 06:43 PM
#58
Driver
I hate dynos that plot graphs via the speed (mph); needs to be rpms! Love that the HP continues to climb even at the rev limit.
Besides the SARD ecu, has there been anything else in the market that can raise the rev limiter? I feel there's some additional ponies to be had in the higher rpms that are being stifled by the limiter.
Besides the SARD ecu, has there been anything else in the market that can raise the rev limiter? I feel there's some additional ponies to be had in the higher rpms that are being stifled by the limiter.
