Mpg@70 mph?
#1
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
Mpg@70 mph?
I'm sure fuel economy querys have been beaten to death on this forum. Hopefully this is a refreshing and simple request. I'd like to know what MPG could be expected on the freeway with cruise control locked on 70 mph in a non-AWD LS460. Thank you.
#3
Pole Position
At 70 mph I get 30 - 30.5 mpg all day. At 75-76 mph which is about my high cruise comfort zone I get 28.5 - 29 mpg
Dennis
Dennis
#5
Between 70-80 I get around 30-31 on relatively flat pavement. It get's a bit sketchy once hills are thrown into the curve. But on a typical 100 mile cruise at 75-80 I get around 26-28 due to the cold. Otherwise in the summer with warmer air I get around 28-30 depending on the prevalence of hills.
You can probably do better if you self modulate the throttle too.
You can probably do better if you self modulate the throttle too.
#6
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
Wow, those are amazing numbers. I haven't seen mention of the drag coefficient, but I recall the LS 430 was remarkably slick, especially for a large sedan. Low to mid 30s in a 380 hp luxury ride virtually defies the laws of physics. I've been driving my daughter's 2002 V-6 Avalon lately. It pulls 26 to 28 running on the freeway around 70 mph.
My follow-up question is not intended to cast doubt on the stated figures, it's matter of curiousity: how accurate is the computer versus hand calculations for mpg? My LS 430 was scary-accurate, always within three tenths, which I'd guess is meaningless given full technique margin of error.
Anyhow, I have renewed rationalization for buying a 460: "efficient commuter." Guess I can cross many econoboxes off my list of next vehicles! Thanks for the feedback.
My follow-up question is not intended to cast doubt on the stated figures, it's matter of curiousity: how accurate is the computer versus hand calculations for mpg? My LS 430 was scary-accurate, always within three tenths, which I'd guess is meaningless given full technique margin of error.
Anyhow, I have renewed rationalization for buying a 460: "efficient commuter." Guess I can cross many econoboxes off my list of next vehicles! Thanks for the feedback.
#7
I was also shocked with how efficient the car is at speed.
Just remember, if you're doing any stop and go driving, kiss that good mileage away because that's when the V8ness of the V8 kicks in.
I've found mine to be pretty spot on. I don't remember the margin of error though I'll have to go back and dig up some numbers.
Just remember, if you're doing any stop and go driving, kiss that good mileage away because that's when the V8ness of the V8 kicks in.
I've found mine to be pretty spot on. I don't remember the margin of error though I'll have to go back and dig up some numbers.
Trending Topics
#8
Lexus Test Driver
If I recall correctly, I read that its about 1-2 mpg off.
But that figure was in relation to the average all-around mpg per tank of fuel.
So to arrive at that figure within those given parameters (mpg@70mph), im guessing it would near the same if not dead on.
Also, I believe the drag coefficient of the LS 460 was better when the '07 design was introduced.
What I find interesting on my car (and its quite visual because my car is a darker color), is that when it rains and the water/dirt mixture dries up on the cars body surface, you can actually see the path at which the air flows against the car as it powers forward.
Up front is typically darker, but as you view and move along the hood, up the front windshield and top of the car, and especially the sides of the car, the lines become fewer and faint, which can be believed to show just how well the car handles negative force due to its physical exterior make-up.
But that figure was in relation to the average all-around mpg per tank of fuel.
So to arrive at that figure within those given parameters (mpg@70mph), im guessing it would near the same if not dead on.
Also, I believe the drag coefficient of the LS 460 was better when the '07 design was introduced.
What I find interesting on my car (and its quite visual because my car is a darker color), is that when it rains and the water/dirt mixture dries up on the cars body surface, you can actually see the path at which the air flows against the car as it powers forward.
Up front is typically darker, but as you view and move along the hood, up the front windshield and top of the car, and especially the sides of the car, the lines become fewer and faint, which can be believed to show just how well the car handles negative force due to its physical exterior make-up.
#9
Lexus Test Driver
I recently went on a trip to South Carolina and averaged over 600 miles per tank. One was around 612 and that was at 75-80mph. This thing is a beast on the highway.
#11
Lexus Test Driver
Your results will vary based on different cars, but don't automatically assume lower speed always means better gas mileage.
#12
Pole Position
I get around 30mpg...when I go 80 it doesn't go down much...if at all. The car gets better gas mileage overall than my wife's Honda CRV, and that's a four cylinder. I drive mine 500-700 miles a week, I wouldn't do that if it wasn't great on gas.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post