IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

ISF vs new WRX STI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-15, 05:25 AM
  #31  
fearnight
Driver
 
fearnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Alabama
Posts: 72
Received 34 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SubOrbital
The only place a WRX/STI will have an advantage is from a dig.
I'm sure it's frowned upon to link directly to street racing videos on here, so I'll let you search it on your own:
YouTube title: Lexus ISF vs STi
Username: Daniel Carrión
Old 11-04-15, 01:39 PM
  #32  
XutvJet
Driver
 
XutvJet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: KS
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

This particular WRX has slightly built block (pistons, rods, bearings, reworked heads and valvetrain), a bigger turbo, and a 6MT swap as the major stuff. These engines are incredibly easy to build up and it's astounding how much power they'll hold once you build them up just a little bit. All things considered, it's pretty dang cheap for the performance in return. All in (including the car), he's in for around $25K.


9.5@151mph, 1.56 60 foot


Old 11-04-15, 01:43 PM
  #33  
LOWFAST
Advanced
 
LOWFAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Texas - DFW Area
Posts: 574
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by XutvJet
This particular WRX has slightly built block (pistons, rods, bearings, reworked heads and valvetrain), a bigger turbo, and a 6MT swap. All in (including the car), he's in for around $25K.


9.5@151mph, 1.56 60 foot]
Not sure we follow your point. I could post a long list of fox body mustangs that can run that number or faster for under $25k total as well. That does not make them an ISF or better than an ISF. I don't think the original question was "how can I go fast for as little scratch as possible." It was to compare a stock ISF to a stock STI both costing around $40k.

That thing would suck *** to daily drive in traffic compared the luxury of a Lexus. Actually, with the exhaust straight out of the turbo it would not be passing any emissions test so no bueno on daily driver in most large cities, plus one piece of road debris and kiss that impeller goodbye.
Old 11-04-15, 02:08 PM
  #34  
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
I8ABMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waiting for next track day
Posts: 22,608
Received 102 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

a buddy of mine recently went with the new Mustang because he said the seats killed him in the STI, and he is very thin too lol
Old 11-04-15, 04:10 PM
  #35  
ForzaF
Pole Position
iTrader: (3)
 
ForzaF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: London,ONT
Posts: 350
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Do they still hold the reputation for having glass transmissions ? Or is that a thing of the past?
Old 11-04-15, 04:53 PM
  #36  
MWIS350
Lexus Champion
 
MWIS350's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

STI look nice but for me ISF all the way.
Old 11-04-15, 06:34 PM
  #37  
Gearbangin
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (7)
 
Gearbangin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 1,158
Received 223 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

I'm not impressed.

View this post on Instagram

Last edited by Gearbangin; 11-05-15 at 12:43 PM.
Old 11-04-15, 11:51 PM
  #38  
F_Throttle
Lead Lap
 
F_Throttle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: ca
Posts: 508
Received 26 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

I use to be an STi fan, and I can't even explain why.. Feel like the HP numbers are low for whatever class it's in.
Old 11-05-15, 06:20 PM
  #39  
MWIS350
Lexus Champion
 
MWIS350's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gearbangin
V8 sound great.
Old 11-06-15, 07:26 AM
  #40  
SubOrbital
Lead Lap
 
SubOrbital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: MD
Posts: 501
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jum3
Feel like the HP numbers are low for whatever class it's in.
300hp in 2003 was awesome. 12 years later, not so much.
Old 08-05-16, 04:16 AM
  #41  
Slover99
Driver School Candidate
 
Slover99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Luxury

Originally Posted by H1_OFICR
While the STI is a blast to drive( my brother had one and I seriously contemplated getting one), I love having the combination of an absolute animal as well as a luxury cruiser.. When my father first rode in the IS-F his first words describing it was "executive barge meets hooligan hotrod." that sums up perfection in my book.

Yes the Sti might be nimble but at the end of the day it's really about what you want to feel when you get in the car. A boy racer/rigid ride or a little more subdued sleeper with that level of panache and luxury.
Luxury is a joke. I rode in my sti over 1000 miles, did uber part time. I also have a issue with my lower back. Sti seats actually feel better than most performance cars.
Old 08-05-16, 05:49 AM
  #42  
IredSF
Pole Position
iTrader: (3)
 
IredSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Tx
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RRRacing
I don't want to make it seem like I am posting this just because I am plugging our RR-Racing/Penske coilovers... BUT, comparing stock for stock, certainly the STi will feel like a much more nimble car, but the ISF benefits much more from suspension tuning than the STi. Our RRR/Penske setup combined with our USRS **Transforms** the car like nothing else. It becomes more precise, more balanced, and more fun than an STi.


Only disadvantage of an ISF is the lack fo manual tranny.


Rafi
this ^^^^ AND

upgrade to 042 steering ECU! Had suspension mods (coil overs, LCA bushing from figs, sold links in rear, all together)

even with mods (and tire and wheel upgrade ) steering felt artificial and numb.

042 steering ECU on my 2010 (stock model is 040) steering is a revelation!! Direct, immediate, no numbness, EXCELLENT FEEL AND FEEBACK.

had all the suspension mods and the OLD ECU largely MASKED THE FEEL OF the improvements.

only whith the new steering ECU could I realize and FEEL the benefit to steering that all the suspension mods had wrought.

if you mod suspension and you have an 08-11 this is MUST DO MOD, if you want to enjoy what the car is really capable of.

Old 08-05-16, 10:14 AM
  #43  
bbong
Intermediate
 
bbong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: PA
Posts: 289
Received 28 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

I had a brand new 06 STI that I took from stock, all the way to 530whp on Dyno Dynamics dynamometer and it wasn't anything as some would say that all you need is Turbo and Engine to get it above 400whp. You need to consider tons of other supporting mods. IC, Injectors, Fuel Pump, Cooling then you might start running into backpressure issues, so headers, uppipe etc. etc. it was never ending. I loved the car and actually wife shed a tear when I was selling it, but at that power level, it was nothing like the ISF. It's a money pit! Also it helps a lot if you learn how to ECU Tune, that'll save you lots of time and money.

Maybe one reason why I left Evo and STI scene was because of never ending modding bug and lust for more power, but it was getting pricey quick, going to a race track I'd be afraid for IC pipes blowing off or something else going bad, I would haul tons of tools with me to allow me to quickly service it if something non-major happened. Stock suspension was also meh and without any nannys it wasn't very forgivable car on the track.

I moved on to ISF and the V8. I like instant throttle response, I love the reliability factor and that I don't need to worry about it when I track it. All in all, I would probably not get a new WRX/STI, but get a 04-10 WRX/STI hopefully cheap and leave it for the winter fun as the STI, especially with Locked Diff and Blizzaks was a tank in the snow.
Old 08-06-16, 09:41 PM
  #44  
2URGSE
Racer
 
2URGSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 1,689
Received 34 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Not even a match.....Subaru lost focus with the STi. I owned a 2004, with 2005/2006 being the best years of that car.

The new ones had issues, and are ugly as hell. (Looks like a Toyota Corolla on steroids)

Old 08-07-16, 08:00 PM
  #45  
jv12
Rookie
 
jv12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: TX
Posts: 50
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I recently drove the WRX STI while in the process of buying a car. It was certainly fast, had a manual transmission, but all I could hear was very loud road noise on the test drive. Turned me off. On top of that it looks like a 12 year-old designed it For 38-40K it looks cheap and I'd really rather keep my ISF.


Quick Reply: ISF vs new WRX STI



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:30 PM.