Hybrid Technology Unique topics related to the ES300h model hybrid drivetrain and other features/options found only on the ES300h. Please use the main 7ES forum for discussion about shared components with other seventh generation ES models.

2019 ES vs UX hybrid MPG... what am I missing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-18, 12:43 PM
  #1  
reposado2
Driver
Thread Starter
 
reposado2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 164
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default 2019 ES vs UX hybrid MPG... what am I missing?

So the 2019 UX hybrid has 176 hp with 38 combined MPG. The 2019 ES hybrid has 215 hp with 44 MPG.

So the ES has about 20% more HP, 15% better MPG, and is over all roomier car??

All this while Lexus claims the UX will have the latest hybrid technology...

Whats going on?
The following users liked this post:
Andrew2 (05-31-18)
Old 05-15-18, 02:03 PM
  #2  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,332
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,021 Posts
Default

I haven't seen numbers for either, but it wouldn't surprise me to see the UX hybrid to be heavier, plus it has AWD (rear electric motor), and probably not as aerodynamic.

Less power despite the aerodynamics and extra weight will mean the engine and electric motors will have to work harder. An extra motor in the rear will be more draw on the batteries, meaning the gas engine may have to step in more.

Just guesses on my part.
The following users liked this post:
reposado2 (05-15-18)
Old 05-15-18, 02:17 PM
  #3  
reposado2
Driver
Thread Starter
 
reposado2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 164
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
I haven't seen numbers for either, but it wouldn't surprise me to see the UX hybrid to be heavier, plus it has AWD (rear electric motor), and probably not as aerodynamic.

Less power despite the aerodynamics and extra weight will mean the engine and electric motors will have to work harder. An extra motor in the rear will be more draw on the batteries, meaning the gas engine may have to step in more.

Just guesses on my part.
Ic. I know they are different class of cars with different price points but it just seem weird how one sort of blows away the other in terms of Mpg/power.
Old 05-15-18, 07:32 PM
  #4  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Weight and aero are likely the culprits. Also the ES engine sounds like it’s less strained with a 2.5L vs 2.0L. Less work to do
Old 05-15-18, 08:14 PM
  #5  
john341
Pole Position
 
john341's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 357
Received 55 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

I am pretty sure its because of the higher capacity battery and probably due to lithium battery.
Old 05-29-18, 08:12 PM
  #6  
boe
Driver
 
boe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 173
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The pervious 300h had terrible acceleration - not sure if they fixed it in the 2019 model - hopefully they have.
Old 05-29-18, 08:45 PM
  #7  
john341
Pole Position
 
john341's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 357
Received 55 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boe
The pervious 300h had terrible acceleration - not sure if they fixed it in the 2019 model - hopefully they have.
LOL. I have driven my 14 es300h for 62000 miles. I have never felt it was slow. Sure, it does not have acceleration of a V6, But it gives me 36 MPG average and it has tremendous amount of passing power on the highway. If you want acceleration, more than usual sport mode is your friend. As an owner I love my es300h. I hate it when I get an es350 as a rental during oil changes, mainly due to the transmission behavior during stop and go traffic.
Old 05-30-18, 03:36 AM
  #8  
Freds430
Pole Position
 
Freds430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 2,456
Received 1,059 Likes on 693 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john341
LOL. I have driven my 14 es300h for 62000 miles. I have never felt it was slow. Sure, it does not have acceleration of a V6, But it gives me 36 MPG average and it has tremendous amount of passing power on the highway. If you want acceleration, more than usual sport mode is your friend. As an owner I love my es300h. I hate it when I get an es350 as a rental during oil changes, mainly due to the transmission behavior during stop and go traffic.
Could not agree any more!!!
Old 05-30-18, 06:12 AM
  #9  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john341
LOL. I have driven my 14 es300h for 62000 miles. I have never felt it was slow. Sure, it does not have acceleration of a V6, But it gives me 36 MPG average and it has tremendous amount of passing power on the highway. If you want acceleration, more than usual sport mode is your friend. As an owner I love my es300h. I hate it when I get an es350 as a rental during oil changes, mainly due to the transmission behavior during stop and go traffic.
After driving my 2015 ESh almost religiously in ECO mode, I am trying Normal mode now as my commute involves highway driving. I can feel the difference in acceleration. Off-the-line acceleration is quite strong, pushing me back into my seat, and it is more than quick enough to pass on the highway. That is really all that is needed; anything much more powerful would be wasted on our busy streets and highways.
Old 05-31-18, 06:50 AM
  #10  
Andrew2
Driver School Candidate
 
Andrew2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: FL
Posts: 16
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by reposado2
So the 2019 UX hybrid has 176 hp with 38 combined MPG. The 2019 ES hybrid has 215 hp with 44 MPG.

So the ES has about 20% more HP, 15% better MPG, and is over all roomier car??

All this while Lexus claims the UX will have the latest hybrid technology...

Whats going on?
Interesting find!
Old 05-31-18, 01:21 PM
  #11  
E46CT
Lexus Test Driver
 
E46CT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: zero maintenance
Posts: 8,607
Received 2,079 Likes on 1,570 Posts
Default

Consider this take:

The UX gets 38 mpg. The CT200h also gets 38 mpg. The CT is lower, lighter, and smaller (last one thrown in for fun) the UX is taller, heavier (about 3700-3800 lbs by my estimation), makes more power and gets the SAME mpg as the CT200h. More drive wheels and more interior space.

To me that's an absolute win. Not sure how Lexus eeked out 38 mpg out of essentially an SUV.

As far as the ES, consider the Camry hybrid (same powertrain) gets about 50-52 mpg combined. The ES is heavier, likely has more rubber on the road, so gets 44 combined.

All excellent figures for ALL cars above.
Old 06-08-18, 06:56 AM
  #12  
Vladi
Pole Position
 
Vladi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Price plays the biggest part in hybrid setup so that's why you see the difference in efficiency.

But there is something weird about UX, it seems like it's made after ES and somehow got a debut before ES. Next gen trackpad is the give away. ES still has the current one.
Old 06-19-18, 11:21 AM
  #13  
Bichon
Super Moderator
 
Bichon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,282
Received 255 Likes on 225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by E46CT
As far as the ES, consider the Camry hybrid (same powertrain) gets about 50-52 mpg combined. The ES is heavier, likely has more rubber on the road, so gets 44 combined.
To be fair, the new Camry Hybrid XLE and SE with the same NiMH batteries as the ES only gets 46 combined. The one that gets 52 combined is the Camry Hybrid LE, that has Lithium-ion batteries. (and yes, admittedly the LE weighs less too)
Old 06-19-18, 03:06 PM
  #14  
nuraman00
Instructor
 
nuraman00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 750
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john341
LOL. I have driven my 14 es300h for 62000 miles. I have never felt it was slow. Sure, it does not have acceleration of a V6, But it gives me 36 MPG average and it has tremendous amount of passing power on the highway. If you want acceleration, more than usual sport mode is your friend. As an owner I love my es300h. I hate it when I get an es350 as a rental during oil changes, mainly due to the transmission behavior during stop and go traffic.
Originally Posted by Sulu
After driving my 2015 ESh almost religiously in ECO mode, I am trying Normal mode now as my commute involves highway driving. I can feel the difference in acceleration. Off-the-line acceleration is quite strong, pushing me back into my seat, and it is more than quick enough to pass on the highway. That is really all that is needed; anything much more powerful would be wasted on our busy streets and highways.
If most of my driving is on city streets, would I still notice good gas mpg performance?

I can go several weeks without going on the highway.
Old 06-23-18, 07:53 PM
  #15  
Benoit
Advanced
 
Benoit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 604
Received 41 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

I can just confirm what was said above. The automobile industry really had a breakthrough as they went from this :

to this :


SUV are, basically, a step back into 1928 automobile technique. Even the best of them are nothing other than clunky cabinets with wheels.


In my eyes, those cars are absolutely irrationnal in our actual society and they tend to underline why our governments are incompetent when it comes to ecologic measures and population safety. I really hope that SUV will be banned in the future.


Quick Reply: 2019 ES vs UX hybrid MPG... what am I missing?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:09 PM.