ES - 1st to 4th Gen (1990-2006) Forum for all 1990 - 2006 ES300 and ES330 models. ES250 topics go here as well.

Best ES300 Model Year? (1992-2001)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-18, 02:57 PM
  #1  
crura
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
crura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Best ES300 Model Year? (1992-2001)

I have recently being doing lots of research on this model and have decided that I would get one for myself. But my main question is which model year is the best? What should I look for when searching and how much should I expect to pay. Thanks!
Old 04-22-18, 05:52 PM
  #2  
LeX2K
Lexus Champion
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 19,447
Received 2,714 Likes on 2,299 Posts
Default

1992-1993 if you can find one in a 5-speed. 1996 for overall quality 2000-2001 for the overall package. 1997+ potentially have sludge problems, '92-93 have head gasket issues. '99-01 have weaker transmissions so a maintenance history is more important.

1990-1991 if you want to go old school.
The following users liked this post:
sahibson (04-22-18)
Old 04-22-18, 08:12 PM
  #3  
sahibson
Driver School Candidate
 
sahibson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Dubai
Posts: 10
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hi,
My car is 2000 model. Can you tell me what are the issues of the transmission and how to take care of it ?
Regards
Old 04-22-18, 08:51 PM
  #4  
LeX2K
Lexus Champion
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 19,447
Received 2,714 Likes on 2,299 Posts
Default

The U140E is a weaker transmission (oil fouling) versus the previous A541E. Meaning regular maintenance is important I replace the fluid in mine every 20,000 miles. Overkill according to some but doing that means my transmission will likely never fail.
Old 04-24-18, 01:02 PM
  #5  
Oro
Racer
 
Oro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: wa
Posts: 1,802
Received 339 Likes on 294 Posts
Default

Another problem I have heard with the U140E is that one of the planetary gear sets has insufficent thrust bearing support. The bearing set shatters and then wrecks the transmission. This is the fear that kept me away from that year range; these are certainly the most attractive years of the ES300/330 and in the peak quality years as mentioned. This problem is an engineering flaw that Toyota/Aisin has made elsewhere. 2002+ Sequioas fail for exactly the same reason. Why it is not as common in LCs or Tundra, I do not know (or maybe it is and I just don’t know).

I think 20k ATF changes are prudent in almost any transmission. If not a whole fluid swap, at least the pan contents.

The 2002+ ES300/330 are nice cars. Pleasant interior (The look/design is even superior to the contemporary LS 430 IMO), but just a very blah exterior. These are still genuine Lexus Japan made and better than newer models in quality. The 5 speed transmission in them is also a nice feature and virtually bulletproof, or at least about as much as an AT can be.

Old 05-03-18, 04:32 PM
  #6  
1960vw
Rookie
 
1960vw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ca
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Transmission went, no forward. Mechanic found bad planetaries. Rebuilding whole thing for $1700 and one year warranty. 2001 es300 with 165000 miles.
Old 05-04-18, 12:42 AM
  #7  
PCV
Driver School Candidate
 
PCV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Oro
Another problem I have heard with the U140E is that one of the planetary gear sets has insufficent thrust bearing support. The bearing set shatters and then wrecks the transmission. This is the fear that kept me away from that year range; these are certainly the most attractive years of the ES300/330 and in the peak quality years as mentioned. This problem is an engineering flaw that Toyota/Aisin has made elsewhere. 2002+ Sequioas fail for exactly the same reason. Why it is not as common in LCs or Tundra, I do not know (or maybe it is and I just don’t know).

I think 20k ATF changes are prudent in almost any transmission. If not a whole fluid swap, at least the pan contents.

The 2002+ ES300/330 are nice cars. Pleasant interior (The look/design is even superior to the contemporary LS 430 IMO), but just a very blah exterior. These are still genuine Lexus Japan made and better than newer models in quality. The 5 speed transmission in them is also a nice feature and virtually bulletproof, or at least about as much as an AT can be.


Just an FYI the problematic transmission on 01-04 Sequoias are A340E/F. They are the same the transmissions as seen on 3rd gen 4runners, which are proven to be reliable at least on light trucks. Maybe it can't handle the torque when you slap it on a V8 motor
Old 05-04-18, 11:06 AM
  #8  
Oro
Racer
 
Oro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: wa
Posts: 1,802
Received 339 Likes on 294 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PCV
Just an FYI the problematic transmission on 01-04 Sequoias are A340E/F. They are the same the transmissions as seen on 3rd gen 4runners, which are proven to be reliable at least on light trucks. Maybe it can't handle the torque when you slap it on a V8 motor
Right, it’s a different transmission - what I meant was the root cause was the same from what I can gather. Either planetary gear sets that could not take the loads, or thrust bearings supporting them that were improperly built and wore out, then letting the planetary fail. I have read speculation this was because of changing the parts supplier and while the parts where engineered OK, they weren’t built correctly (maybe inferior steel) and it wasn’t caught for a while. I said it was an engineering flaw above but breaking it down, that may not be strictly true. This is what I have read; I can’t personally verify it, but it sounds credible since the exact design worked previously, and afterwards.

It is also odd to me that, regarding the A340, it is most identified with the Sequioa and doesn’t seem as common in the equally equipped Tundra and LC. I could see how the 4Runner could slide under the threshold of failure, but not the other two. Or maybe it does happen there and I just don’t know it. I used to drive a 98LC (fantastic truck) quite a bit and tow a lot with it, it was bullet proof to high mileage and before the years of the problem, but the exact drivetrain.
Old 05-04-18, 12:42 PM
  #9  
GoodRevs
Instructor
 
GoodRevs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NH
Posts: 867
Received 45 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

The older 2nd gen ES is ideal if you want a manual transmission. The 3rd gen ES is considered by many including myself to be the best looking ES produced. The 2000/01 is a light, nimble car with sufficient power that is very quiet and does an excellent job isolating the driver from the road while providing reliable transportation for hundreds of thousands of miles (mine has 172k and I plan to keep it for as long as possible.) The 4ES is technologically a much better car - projector HIDs (05/06), 5spd, rear air vents, navigation, bluetooth, air conditioned seats etc. It also has far more rear headspace and interior room than the 3ES. However the 3ES can be brought up to modern specs in many regards with a fresh headunit and backup cam.

If reliability and class are your main objectives get the 3ES. If you want modernity for a reasonable price get the 4ES, which is also a very good looking car.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cthao
ES - 1st to 4th Gen (1990-2006)
9
02-11-20 04:53 PM
1960vw
ES - 1st to 4th Gen (1990-2006)
0
05-02-18 09:06 PM
Kellzy13
ES - 1st to 4th Gen (1990-2006)
1
07-10-16 12:24 PM
ES300 Adrian
ES - 1st to 4th Gen (1990-2006)
5
12-09-01 01:36 PM



Quick Reply: Best ES300 Model Year? (1992-2001)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:57 PM.