GThaus/Meisterschaft midpipe with oem mufflers?
I really appreciate your thoughts! Do you perhaps have any videos? I just purchased the midpipe and I'm seriously wondering what the sound is like. Is it more noticeable than stock?
Well if you're looking for a GTHAUS axle-back I might have one for you come December. Ordering a cat-back Invidia from Josh at Meraki, but ETA is December. I wanted quick satisfaction with my new RC-F and the only pipe available right now is the GTHAUS (though I think Apexi has more in-stock now).
On-topic: The combination I have yet to see around is just the GTHAUS axle-back (what I have now). The cold start is pretty damn loud haha. I might record a couple vids today.
On-topic: The combination I have yet to see around is just the GTHAUS axle-back (what I have now). The cold start is pretty damn loud haha. I might record a couple vids today.
Would not recommend it since the OEM axleback is one of the most restrictive part of the entire exhaust system. There is a nasty 90 degree bend just in the last part of the exhaust before the mufflers. Also, the secondary cats are normally deleted in a full exhaust, which free up some more HP and add more noise. I believe the piping diameter also reduces in the axleback portion. If one wants to fully benefit from an aftermarket exhaust in terms of sound quality and HP gain then full catback is the way to go.

And yeah agreed there as well. Even just an axle-back. I think it was mentioned that the axle-back is the most restrictive part of the RCF's exhaust system. The GTHAUS axle-back I have on right now made a night-and-day difference. Neck-breaking punches. I haven't dyno'd it so I don't know the exact numbers, but I'd estimate ~15-20whp.
Last edited by anakratis; Oct 14, 2021 at 04:43 PM.
thanks!
CG
No way you should be sad about that trade-in—it's such an amazing machine. I'll most likely end up going the same route next year once the 2020s start getting punted off of leases. 2020 refresh of the LC had some important suspension upgrades I want to have 
And yeah agreed there as well. Even just an axle-back. I think it was mentioned that the axle-back is the most restrictive part of the RCF's exhaust system. The GTHAUS axle-back I have on right now made a night-and-day difference. Neck-breaking punches. I haven't dyno'd it so I don't know the exact numbers, but I'd estimate ~15-20whp.

And yeah agreed there as well. Even just an axle-back. I think it was mentioned that the axle-back is the most restrictive part of the RCF's exhaust system. The GTHAUS axle-back I have on right now made a night-and-day difference. Neck-breaking punches. I haven't dyno'd it so I don't know the exact numbers, but I'd estimate ~15-20whp.
sorry for the late reply I will take a video this weeked and loaded so you can hear it. IMO it sounds good when you punch it no drown on the highway, and where in Texas are you located
Oh, that's a nice trade that I have been thinkering for a while now. Can you help us and share your thoughts comparing RCF to LC500? Specifically in terms of handling, cornering, picking up speed? I am aware of the looks, and internal premium feels ...etc. I am at a moment of decision either upgrading RCF exhaust / wheels or holding for 2020 LC500 with active rear steering.
thanks!
CG
thanks!
CG
Last edited by 05RollaXRS; Dec 2, 2021 at 06:48 AM.
Oh, that's a nice trade that I have been thinkering for a while now. Can you help us and share your thoughts comparing RCF to LC500? Specifically in terms of handling, cornering, picking up speed? I am aware of the looks, and internal premium feels ...etc. I am at a moment of decision either upgrading RCF exhaust / wheels or holding for 2020 LC500 with active rear steering.
thanks!
CG
thanks!
CG
first I would say that they are completely different cars. Totally subjective, but I felt that Lexus held back on the RC F. I put mine into sport every time I started it, just to get good throttle response. The exhaust made a big difference on throttle response and power delivery. in this area, the LC seems fine. More natural. The exhaust opens up above 3000 and it makes you want to rev it more.
Suspension: hands down the RC F. I had the TVD. Suspension was tighter on the RC F. But, that is on purpose because they are different cars. I would prefer the LC with tighter suspension, but clearly I a in the minority on that point. I will have lowering springs installed, so that should help.
Acceleration: I would say the RC F. Especially with that meisterschaft exhaust.
Brakes: the Brembo brakes on the RC F arc very strong. Personally I think the pads and rotors are weak. I replaced both of them. Brakes were incredible after that (I don’t mind a squeal here or there). The brakes on the LC are even bigger. I will replace the pads on them too soon. So I expect that to be a wash. Distance may be a bit longer because the LC is heavier but it should brake just as hard.
But honestly, I like driving the LC better. The way the stock exhaust is tuned makes you want to rev it every time. I feel that the car is well sorted and that Lexus put a lot of time into it.
I did not plan to or expect to buy one. I loved my RC F but I am happy I made the trade. It is an upgrade.
My RC F and LC at trade-in
Thanks for sharing. Very insightful. RCF Brembos have 6 pistons front and 4 pistons rear. I believe that is a difference in braking power on LC vs RCF.
I was one of those guys happy with my RC F, especially after the exhaust upgrade. Felt that the LC was essentially the same car, but slightly bigger and heavier. While it I thought it looked great, I did not really consider upgrading. But really like the look of the convertible. So when I saw one on the showroom I jumped on it.
first I would say that they are completely different cars. Totally subjective, but I felt that Lexus held back on the RC F. I put mine into sport every time I started it, just to get good throttle response. The exhaust made a big difference on throttle response and power delivery. in this area, the LC seems fine. More natural. The exhaust opens up above 3000 and it makes you want to rev it more.
Suspension: hands down the RC F. I had the TVD. Suspension was tighter on the RC F. But, that is on purpose because they are different cars. I would prefer the LC with tighter suspension, but clearly I a in the minority on that point. I will have lowering springs installed, so that should help.
Acceleration: I would say the RC F. Especially with that meisterschaft exhaust.
Brakes: the Brembo brakes on the RC F arc very strong. Personally I think the pads and rotors are weak. I replaced both of them. Brakes were incredible after that (I don’t mind a squeal here or there). The brakes on the LC are even bigger. I will replace the pads on them too soon. So I expect that to be a wash. Distance may be a bit longer because the LC is heavier but it should brake just as hard.
But honestly, I like driving the LC better. The way the stock exhaust is tuned makes you want to rev it every time. I feel that the car is well sorted and that Lexus put a lot of time into it.
I did not plan to or expect to buy one. I loved my RC F but I am happy I made the trade. It is an upgrade.
My RC F and LC at trade-in
first I would say that they are completely different cars. Totally subjective, but I felt that Lexus held back on the RC F. I put mine into sport every time I started it, just to get good throttle response. The exhaust made a big difference on throttle response and power delivery. in this area, the LC seems fine. More natural. The exhaust opens up above 3000 and it makes you want to rev it more.
Suspension: hands down the RC F. I had the TVD. Suspension was tighter on the RC F. But, that is on purpose because they are different cars. I would prefer the LC with tighter suspension, but clearly I a in the minority on that point. I will have lowering springs installed, so that should help.
Acceleration: I would say the RC F. Especially with that meisterschaft exhaust.
Brakes: the Brembo brakes on the RC F arc very strong. Personally I think the pads and rotors are weak. I replaced both of them. Brakes were incredible after that (I don’t mind a squeal here or there). The brakes on the LC are even bigger. I will replace the pads on them too soon. So I expect that to be a wash. Distance may be a bit longer because the LC is heavier but it should brake just as hard.
But honestly, I like driving the LC better. The way the stock exhaust is tuned makes you want to rev it every time. I feel that the car is well sorted and that Lexus put a lot of time into it.
I did not plan to or expect to buy one. I loved my RC F but I am happy I made the trade. It is an upgrade.
My RC F and LC at trade-in
Last edited by 05RollaXRS; Dec 3, 2021 at 11:45 AM.
LC has 6 Piston in front 4 piston in rear. 2 piece rotors. The also larger. Specs are out there somewhere online. They are really good brakes. I think that Lexus put soft pads on it to prevent noise. I would prefer a more aggressive pad personally. That is my only issue with them. But I think that is a Lexus issue. Too many owners complain about brake noise.
^^^^The Less dusty less performance oriented pads were introduced for the LC as a TSB in 2018. These were intended for owners who did not appreciate the more aggressive nature of the stock pads and who complained about the dust and noise of the OEM pads. Unfortunately they have become the stock pads on the 2021 and later LC in the Base and Touring iterations. The Sport and the DHP both soldier on with the original Hi-Po pads. Apparently a lot of LC owners don't know how to properly bed-in brake pads.
I have the Hi-Po pads and find them very effective. In my previous ISF I had Ferodo on the front and PMs on the back. I have no intention of changing the pads on my LC, they are as good as any street oriented Hi-Po pad I have tried. The 6/4 pot brakes in the LC are very good IMHO.
I have the Hi-Po pads and find them very effective. In my previous ISF I had Ferodo on the front and PMs on the back. I have no intention of changing the pads on my LC, they are as good as any street oriented Hi-Po pad I have tried. The 6/4 pot brakes in the LC are very good IMHO.











