When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Though, I own a 2 door sports car, it is mostly because the RCF is not available in 4 doors and GSF was too big for me and styling was not my cup of tea so RCF was the only choice. Yes, 4 door cars can be sports cars. It has been proven time and again cars with 4 doors perform equally as well as their 2 door counterparts particularly in three box design cars. The M3 and M4 (and the older E90 M3 and E92 M3) were good examples. 4 doors also has an inherent advantage as far as chassis torsional rigidity goes because of a B-pillar, which coupes don't have (hence the need for extra chassis reinforcements).
I think we may be arguing semantics here. A four-door sports car is usually thought of as a sports-sedan. For years, up till recently, the BMW 3-series was the classic poster-child of a good sports sedan.
Though, I own a 2 door sports car, it is mostly because the RCF is not available in 4 doors and GSF was too big for me and styling was not my cup of tea so RCF was the only choice. Yes, 4 door cars can be sports cars. It has been proven time and again cars with 4 doors perform equally as well as their 2 door counterparts particularly in three box design cars. The M3 and M4 (and the older E90 M3 and E92 M3) were good examples. 4 doors also has an inherent advantage as far as chassis torsional rigidity goes because of a B-pillar, which coupes don't have (hence the need for extra chassis reinforcements).
I recently stumbled across a rumor of a new IS F...
Though, I do like the RC F just for its presence, which I'm not sure an IS F of this generation would be able to match. Though, I am sure the chassis would work well in an F version.
Mostly no, but with two possible exceptions...the Mitsubishi Evo and Subaru WRX/STI.
Originally Posted by S2000toIS350
Panamera Turbo E Hybrid may have something to say here (if it could speak)
Originally Posted by arentz07
I recently stumbled across a rumor of a new IS F...
Though, I do like the RC F just for its presence, which I'm not sure an IS F of this generation would be able to match. Though, I am sure the chassis would work well in an F version.
The EVO, STI, Panamera, RF-C are all GTs. They are not "Sports Cars". Neither is the 911 for that matter. Does that mean that they are not "sporty" or used in "motorsports" or raced on the track? Absolutely not. Even fixed roof full on Race Cars are not technically "Sports Cars". The name has been somewhat bastardized in marketing performance oriented cars, so while it's generally acceptable to call a 911 a sports car for simplicity's sake, they are not classified as Sports Cars.
The EVO, STI, Panamera, RF-C are all GTs. They are not "Sports Cars".
No offense, but have you driven an Evo? I have. IMO, it's a classic 4-door sports-car in every sense of the word. In fact, if anything, Mitsubishi may have overdid the suspension.....it beats the hell out of you on anything but glass-smooth roads. But it corners like it's on rails.....it, and the STI, don't dominate the rally-circuts for nothing.
The original definitions, from SCCA and the car manufacturers:
Sports car: 2 doors, 2 seats, capable of winning races (not just fast)
GT car: same with a back seat
Only acceptable reason for a large box attached behind the rear seat: where you put your shotguns and game bags, it's called a "shooting brake" (Aston Martin and Rolls Royce)
Everything else is just a car, including Jaguar sedans