Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Rwhp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 5, 2010 | 09:01 PM
  #1  
BlackSteel's Avatar
BlackSteel
Thread Starter
Rookie
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Tn
Default Rwhp?

Hey Cl members, sorry if this is a dumb question, but can't find my answer anywhere. What would be the rwhp of my practically stock 93' sc400? please let me know your thoughts, thanks
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2010 | 09:07 PM
  #2  
wagomaniac's Avatar
wagomaniac
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

idk but im pretty sure you can find it online somewhere
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2010 | 09:08 PM
  #3  
lexus95's Avatar
lexus95
Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

i have a 95 and if i remember correctly its suppose to be between like 160-180
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2010 | 09:11 PM
  #4  
BlackSteel's Avatar
BlackSteel
Thread Starter
Rookie
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Tn
Default

Originally Posted by lexus95
i have a 95 and if i remember correctly its suppose to be between like 160-180
Thanks man
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2010 | 10:42 PM
  #5  
nfordhk's Avatar
nfordhk
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

sc400 I thought were like 250 at the wheels...?
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2010 | 11:08 PM
  #6  
chnk's Avatar
chnk
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 8
From: GA
Default

only to the engine autotragic and drivetrainloss
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2010 | 11:53 PM
  #7  
TroySC300's Avatar
TroySC300
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Default

My sc300 auto and sc300 manual were both between 170 and 183 on the dyno. sc400 should be higher if it is well maintained.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 12:10 AM
  #8  
tjfrom215's Avatar
tjfrom215
Rookie
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: pa
Default

This is from the other day,
I needed an oil change REALLLY REALLY bad,
Took it back to day and did 201

Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 06:34 AM
  #9  
OneJay's Avatar
OneJay
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,263
Likes: 8
From: Denver
Default

Haha quite the torquey engine you've got!

But ya probably 170-180.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 09:38 AM
  #10  
scforlife's Avatar
scforlife
Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

I thought they were 260 at the flywheel and about 210 at the wheels? Again not sure. Google it?
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 09:46 AM
  #11  
tjfrom215's Avatar
tjfrom215
Rookie
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: pa
Default

Originally Posted by scforlife
I thought they were 260 at the flywheel and about 210 at the wheels? Again not sure. Google it?
I thought those numbers was just for when they tested
the motor. Ive never seen a stock sc4 with those numbers
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 09:47 AM
  #12  
tjfrom215's Avatar
tjfrom215
Rookie
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: pa
Default

my second pull with dirty oil was same HP as that but torque was at 218.9
I didnt get on it as hard as the first, but new oil pulls were much better
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 03:20 PM
  #13  
scforlife's Avatar
scforlife
Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by tjfrom215
I thought those numbers was just for when they tested
the motor. Ive never seen a stock sc4 with those numbers
Thats what i thought as well, i dont think our cars have near that to the wheels. Now i really want too know what they have.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 06:14 PM
  #14  
Kira X's Avatar
Kira X
桜犯罪シンジケート
CL Folding 10,000
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,696
Likes: 668
From: 東京都
Default

I thought the SC400 had about 200 on the original 92-94 1UZ, 210 on the 95-97 1UZ and 240 on the 98-00 due to the increase in power over the years. I heard the SC300 was in the 170's to high 180's though.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 09:06 PM
  #15  
good2go's Avatar
good2go
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

Excerpt from Intellexual net

Differences between the SC300 & SC400

The SC300 comes with a 3.0-liter 182 ci cast iron inline-6 motor with aluminum heads (engine designation: 2JZ-GE) and a choice between a Toyota A343E 4-speed automatic transmission with overdrive or a Toyota W58 5-speed manual transmission (available from 1992-1997).

From 1992-1997, the power was rated as 225 horsepower @ 6000 rpm and 210 ft/lb torque @ 4800 rpm. From 1998-2000, the power was rated as 225 horsepower @ 6000 rpm and 220 ft/lb torque @ 4000 rpm. Curb weight ranges from 3494 lbs. in 1992 to 3560 lbs. in 2000.

The SC400 comes with a 4.0-liter 242 ci cast aluminum V-8 motor with aluminum heads (engine designation: 1UZ-FE) and a standard equipped Toyota A343E 4-speed automatic transmission with overdrive (from 1992-1997). No manual transmission was ever offered for the SC400.

From 1992-1995, the power was rated as 250 horsepower @ 5600 rpm and 260 ft/lb torque @ 4400 rpm. From 1996-1997, the power was rated as 260 horsepower @ 5600 rpm and 270 ft/lb torque @ 4400 rpm. From 1998-2000, the power was rated as 290 horsepower @ 6000 rpm and 300 ft/lb torque @ 4000 rpm. Curb weight ranges from 3575 lbs. in 1992 to 3655 lbs. in 2000.



In general, you can figure a minimum of 15-20% drive train loss off of those numbers before it gets to the wheels, maybe more.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sunblinds
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
66
Apr 28, 2018 04:34 AM
N00bie909
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
61
Sep 1, 2009 12:03 AM
Sweetser
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
8
Aug 23, 2006 02:35 AM
jsyjordan
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
25
May 23, 2006 02:12 PM
wroseberry
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
10
Nov 1, 2005 08:58 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:09 AM.