Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Lance Alignment spec for SC300?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 08:26 PM
  #1  
dejacky's Avatar
dejacky
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: Behind you
Question Lance Alignment spec for SC300?

Has anyone tried these alignment specs on a SC300? Is it good or bad?

http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/lan...ent/index.html
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 12:51 PM
  #2  
SCV8's Avatar
SCV8
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 1
From: Seattle
Default

Those settings work great, tons better than the stock reccomendations, but to keep the toe-in closer to zero without ever going into toe-out would be even better. Those big tires tend to drag, slow you down, also will help with wear.
For highway driving, the camber could be less also; these cars have great suspensions.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 01:15 PM
  #3  
95 Integra's Avatar
95 Integra
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Personally my alignment is done at the following:

Front:
Camber: -.5*
Caster: =3.0*
Toe: 0.00*

Rear:
Camber: -1.1*
Toe: .2*

Thats for "neutral" tire wear, though I must add that I do NOT drive aggressively and if I did the values would be very close to those in the link. My reason for posting this is to bring attention to the fact that your alignment needs to be adjusted for driving style. If I drove agressively I'd get outside tire wear, thus the need for more camber, if I had more camber I still drove like a sissy, then I'd get the inside camber wear that everybody thinks is a "good" thing, but is really a sign of an improper alignment.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 02:14 PM
  #4  
mitsuguy's Avatar
mitsuguy
Maintenance Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,388
Likes: 27
From: AZ
Default

mine are very close to the specs given on that page, but I added a little more neg camber... -1.3 front, -1.75 rear...

handles nicely, and tire wear is very acceptable...

no complains here...
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 03:36 PM
  #5  
dejacky's Avatar
dejacky
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: Behind you
Wink

My sc300 will be on supra TT wheels + Tires (245 front & 275 rear) if it makes a difference .
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 04:29 PM
  #6  
mitsuguy's Avatar
mitsuguy
Maintenance Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,388
Likes: 27
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by dejacky
My sc300 will be on supra TT wheels + Tires (245 front & 275 rear) if it makes a difference .
nope, mine's on 255-18's front and 275-19's rear...
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 05:20 PM
  #7  
dejacky's Avatar
dejacky
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: Behind you
Question

Is there anyway certain alignment settings can cure "bump steer" on a lexus sc300 (stock suspension) with mkiv Supra Twin Turbo wheels (17in wheels with front 245 tire and rear 275 width tire)? I had my car laser aligned to stock sc300 specs and I still get some "bump steer."

Current Alignment:


What do you more experienced folks with supra TT wheels recommend I change in Alignment settings?

Last edited by dejacky; Dec 25, 2006 at 05:24 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 06:59 PM
  #8  
ki_soarer's Avatar
ki_soarer
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 2
From: Maryland
Default

im running the same wheel and tire set up on my SC. im replacing the control arm bushings in the next week or two, along with an allignment... since i just put tires on. ill be aligning it at work. my rear is about perfect for tire wear... if the old tires are still there tomorrow, ill snap a pic. i drive the hell out of my car from time to time, and the rears had very even wear. ill check the specs when i do it, but it will be 2 or 3 weeks.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 12:00 AM
  #9  
mitsuguy's Avatar
mitsuguy
Maintenance Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,388
Likes: 27
From: AZ
Default

Wow, you have positive camber up front?

I realize it's within specs, but definitely highly not recommended...

I would start there, get the fronts to about -.5 degrees.... That should be a lot more drivable... I also like alot more caster... My caster is maxed out on stock adjustment at 3.5... Since my first post in this thread, I've went a lot more aggressive, and every little bit of negative camber you can get helps the handling immensely... (so long as it's balanced front and rear)
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 01:50 AM
  #10  
B1TEM3's Avatar
B1TEM3
Pole Position
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

try to add ballast too on the driver seat, I weigh 160 so I put weight ballast that much on the driver seat, and about 1/2 full gas tank. This way the alignment is more accurate.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Negative1
CT 200h Model (2011-2017)
0
Feb 12, 2016 12:44 PM
chikoo
Car Chat
5
Oct 12, 2015 06:51 AM
doodoo
LS - 3rd Gen (2001-2006)
1
Nov 14, 2014 04:26 PM
Stevoe88
Suspension and Brakes
8
Jul 27, 2011 12:31 PM
Kharizma
Suspension and Brakes
10
Apr 29, 2006 01:32 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:49 PM.