RX - 4th Gen (2016-2022) Discussion topics related to the 2016 and up RX350 and RX450h models

Why doesn't RX350 offer a turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-17, 08:25 AM
  #31  
ggebhardt
Pole Position
 
ggebhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,313
Received 497 Likes on 377 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sirtiger
why would they need to decrease the motor size? If BMW can throw twin turbo in their I6 bay I am sure lexus can find room in a SUV....turbos don't take up that much space. I am just stating that for a few hundred bucks, there will be a decent increase in HP output.
No doubt that Lexus could but this is not how Lexus wants to market the RX.

Adding more ponies means beefing up the entire drive train not to mention brakes and suspension.

Lexus does make exceptions in their product lines and offer a high performance GS, RC and soon LS series but they are all specialty vehicle with "special pricing".

Like I said before, if they did turbo charge it, they would make the motor smaller.

Last edited by ggebhardt; 01-25-17 at 08:29 AM.
Old 06-23-17, 10:01 AM
  #32  
sirtiger
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
 
sirtiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NYC AND LI
Posts: 224
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

last scheduled "free" service, dealer automatically reprogrammed ECM. I noticed better throttle response. It doesn't feel as sluggish anymore. I personally don't feel much of a power difference with the 3RX and 4RX.

After a year and change, I am not a fan of the 8 speed. The 3RX 6 speed was better.
Old 06-23-17, 10:53 AM
  #33  
RGSW
Intermediate
 
RGSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NM
Posts: 419
Received 101 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

I suggest we wait a while for the "Turbo" on the Rx.... The NX has Turbo and that was the first for Lexus brand............................ ,The 2018 LS will have Twin Turbos on a V-6.
Old 06-23-17, 11:19 AM
  #34  
sirtiger
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
 
sirtiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NYC AND LI
Posts: 224
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RGSW
I suggest we wait a while for the "Turbo" on the Rx.... The NX has Turbo and that was the first for Lexus brand............................ ,The 2018 LS will have Twin Turbos on a V-6.
I had the NX as a loaner on 3 separate occasion. I have to admit, it felt underwhelming power wise. I'm sure some here might disagree which is fine. I like the NX appearance exterior & interior. That NAV screen is a bit pathetic compared to the giant ipad size of the RX
Old 06-23-17, 11:25 AM
  #35  
Nail34
Intermediate
 
Nail34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: NorCal
Posts: 415
Received 109 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RGSW
I suggest we wait a while for the "Turbo" on the Rx.... The NX has Turbo and that was the first for Lexus brand............................ ,The 2018 LS will have Twin Turbos on a V-6.
My wife has a '16 NX and like the previous 3 vehicles I have driven with turbo, you floor it, count to 2, then the turbo kicks in. When you need instant power, it just isn't there.
Old 06-23-17, 01:19 PM
  #36  
dchar
Lexus Champion
 
dchar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,954
Received 223 Likes on 178 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nail34
My wife has a '16 NX and like the previous 3 vehicles I have driven with turbo, you floor it, count to 2, then the turbo kicks in. When you need instant power, it just isn't there.
If you think the NX200t is bad, you should try the RC200t. It has the 8-speed, very laggy throttle, and an engine that feels too small for the heavy car. At least the NX still has the 6-speed. My sister's NX200t feels better than the RC200t.
Old 06-23-17, 01:57 PM
  #37  
sirtiger
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
 
sirtiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NYC AND LI
Posts: 224
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dchar
If you think the NX200t is bad, you should try the RC200t. It has the 8-speed, very laggy throttle, and an engine that feels too small for the heavy car. At least the NX still has the 6-speed. My sister's NX200t feels better than the RC200t.
RX200t= 3700lbs? That is one turd of a car. So you are saying its even worst despite the NX200t is 200lb heavier? wow!

No worries, the CT200h aka luxury Prius has the title of the slowest Lexus out there. I driven it and it is a total slug

Last edited by sirtiger; 06-23-17 at 02:01 PM.
Old 06-23-17, 02:21 PM
  #38  
guxu
Pole Position
 
guxu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: AL
Posts: 301
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sirtiger
RX200t= 3700lbs? That is one turd of a car. So you are saying its even worst despite the NX200t is 200lb heavier? wow!

No worries, the CT200h aka luxury Prius has the title of the slowest Lexus out there. I driven it and it is a total slug
A FWD RX 200t is 4,300 lbs. AWD is 4,500 lbs.
Old 06-23-17, 03:45 PM
  #39  
skiracer
Lead Lap
 
skiracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SoCal
Posts: 641
Received 48 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Isn't this V6 used in various other Toyota/Lexus cars and might have a TRD Supercharger available to use?
The following users liked this post:
umpire (03-27-21)
Old 06-23-17, 04:00 PM
  #40  
sirtiger
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
 
sirtiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NYC AND LI
Posts: 224
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by guxu
A FWD RX 200t is 4,300 lbs. AWD is 4,500 lbs.
As noted above, the 4RX is a little heavier than the 3RX. This sort of negates the small horsepower gain. Also as noted, the 8 speed isn't helping the power band either.
Old 06-24-17, 08:24 AM
  #41  
dchar
Lexus Champion
 
dchar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,954
Received 223 Likes on 178 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sirtiger
RC200t= 3700lbs? That is one turd of a car. So you are saying its even worst despite the NX200t is 200lb heavier? wow!

No worries, the CT200h aka luxury Prius has the title of the slowest Lexus out there. I driven it and it is a total slug
I think you made a typo, but I fixed it.

But it at least the CT200h doesn't look like a performance car...the RC200t has the looks that the performance can't match. Idk what Lexus puts in these turbo-4 cars because the GS200t weighs almost 80 lbs more than the GS350, and the RC200t weighs a bit over 20 lbs more than the GS350.
Old 06-26-17, 04:01 PM
  #42  
Z3Harrier
Driver School Candidate
 
Z3Harrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mie Japan
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I've go the I4 Turbo here in Japan, and I came from a 2008 2.4L (Japan Spec). It might be the lower speed limits and the narrower roads here, but I feel the HP is plenty. I've accepted the fact that it is also a big bulky crossover SUV, and use my porsche for when I want to go zoom zoom.
Old 06-29-17, 05:17 AM
  #43  
rayaans
Lexus Test Driver
 
rayaans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sirtiger
I never claimed it was underpowered. I was surprised it didn't have more HP given its a totally redesigned vehicle and compared to its peer. I had the 2014 3RX which was 270HP, about 4200lbs.....compared to 2016 4RX which is 295HP, 4400 lbs....its about the same to me from acceleration standpoint. I'll admit the 8 speed & gearing gives it a different feel when I am accelerating compared to the 6 speed.
Because its not totally redesigned

The 4RX uses the same highlander platform that the 3rd gen did - think of it as a 3RX with improved rear legroom and an up to date design
It was brought out to bring the RX up to line with the rest of the lineup

Although I have word of a 3.0l single turbo coming out at some point in the next few years and its very likely itll replace the aging 3.5l
Old 06-29-17, 07:06 AM
  #44  
Hubs
Pit Crew
 
Hubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: AK
Posts: 119
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by computerwi
The RX350 is plenty powerful in my opinion, just held back by a poorly mapped transmission. I'm sure software could fix the issue but it's clearly tuned for maximum fuel efficiency.
The transmission mapping does the car no favors in terms of fuel efficiency and acceleration. In normal driving it seems like the first 2-3 gears offer nice pickup and then either the torque converter locks up or the transmission shifts to 6th and the engine is lugging.

There also be gear specific engine tuning that modulates HP/torque depending on the gear.
Old 06-29-17, 09:13 AM
  #45  
PeeVee
Advanced
 
PeeVee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 613
Received 86 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

I tend to stay away from turbo. Nice kick and gain of power when needed, but they tend to break...


Quick Reply: Why doesn't RX350 offer a turbo?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 AM.