RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015) Discussion topics related to the 2010 - 2015 RX350 and RX450H models

Opinions on stereo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-14, 12:05 PM
  #31  
satnav
Pole Position
 
satnav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 228
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

The 12 speaker system in a loaner I had recently sounded a lot better than the 12 speaker system I have in my 2010. I think the 2013+ system is digital as it now support surround.
Old 05-18-14, 09:47 PM
  #32  
markrivers
Lexus Test Driver
 
markrivers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: California
Posts: 1,068
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CanadianRX
I have the ML it's good if it's over vol 35. I had to +6 the bass and +5 the treble to give it that punch. Still could use more low end. I'd like to try the premium to compare. I can tell you that ML does not distort at high volumes.
+6 bass and +5 treble which are close to the maximum adjustment possible ONLY proves my point.
That the ML, on the RX is inferior to other brands.
A JBL on a RAV4 sounded better, using the same source ( CD )
The JBL Only needed a +2 bass and +3 on the treble.

Again, the flaw ( RX 350) is in the trunk space.
Old 05-20-14, 02:17 PM
  #33  
klwagoner
Driver
 
klwagoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: OK
Posts: 113
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

My sales guy told me that Pioneer makes the basic stereo. I'm happy with it and I'm pretty picky about my rock music. I've replaced the stereos (and speakers, and added subs) in both my Mustangs (Ford's basic radio sucks). I can totally live with the stereo in the RX 350.
Old 05-20-14, 04:57 PM
  #34  
ngerstman
Rookie
 
ngerstman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: nj
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's hard to believe that someone who has done after market stereos with subs would find the bass in the rx any good. In my estimation there is very little output below 50-60 cycles, if that. As my earlier post in this thread describes, I added a Rockford Fosgate powered sub in the cargo area with improved results, more bass impact and opens up the whole sound. Regards. Ned.
Old 05-20-14, 04:58 PM
  #35  
ngerstman
Rookie
 
ngerstman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: nj
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by klwagoner
My sales guy told me that Pioneer makes the basic stereo. I'm happy with it and I'm pretty picky about my rock music. I've replaced the stereos (and speakers, and added subs) in both my Mustangs (Ford's basic radio sucks). I can totally live with the stereo in the RX 350.
See above post. Regards. Ned.
Old 06-21-14, 11:11 AM
  #36  
Cruzer1
Driver School Candidate
 
Cruzer1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 2013 RX F-Sport with ML and my wife has a 2014 RX350 w/o ML. My ML system has a little bit tighter bass and the treble is a wee bit clearer, especially with higher volume levels. Overall I can say that the difference is really not that noticeable. Both my wife and I have our iPods hooked up to the system 95% of the time. The one improvement both systems could benefit from is a subwoofer. The bass levels in both cars fall short which is a shame considering how good they could be from the factory. I just had a sub installed in my car last week and it is a night and day difference. Other than that, not sure I can say the ML system is worth $1k more.
Old 06-21-14, 11:24 AM
  #37  
CanadianRX
Pit Crew
 
CanadianRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Ontario
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Cruzer1
I have a 2013 RX F-Sport with ML and my wife has a 2014 RX350 w/o ML. My ML system has a little bit tighter bass and the treble is a wee bit clearer, especially with higher volume levels. Overall I can say that the difference is really not that noticeable. Both my wife and I have our iPods hooked up to the system 95% of the time. The one improvement both systems could benefit from is a subwoofer. The bass levels in both cars fall short which is a shame considering how good they could be from the factory. I just had a sub installed in my car last week and it is a night and day difference. Other than that, not sure I can say the ML system is worth $1k more.
There is a sub, it's just underpowered.
Old 06-23-14, 07:31 AM
  #38  
lexus114
Lexus Champion
 
lexus114's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bethlehem Twsp. Pennsylvania
Posts: 4,507
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jfelbab
Sound sounds different to each of us. The salesman may believe the sound is as good or better from his own experience.

I had a choice between the two systems in my 2014 RX350 and found that, for me, there is not a great deal of sound quality difference noticeable in a moving vehicle to justify the added cost of ML. That is likely due to my very old ears and that I supported a howitzer battalion in the Army when I was young. OOW, my hearing is far from perfect.

The best advice I can offer is to take a few of your favorite CDs to the dealer and listen to them in each. You decide what you can hear, not us, or your salesman. Also listen to the systems while on the road. The RX350 cabin is not very quiet.

13Bravo here as well Jim! A 3/21 Fort Polk, Louisiana
Old 06-23-14, 09:00 AM
  #39  
ngerstman
Rookie
 
ngerstman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: nj
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cruzer1
I have a 2013 RX F-Sport with ML and my wife has a 2014 RX350 w/o ML. My ML system has a little bit tighter bass and the treble is a wee bit clearer, especially with higher volume levels. Overall I can say that the difference is really not that noticeable. Both my wife and I have our iPods hooked up to the system 95% of the time. The one improvement both systems could benefit from is a subwoofer. The bass levels in both cars fall short which is a shame considering how good they could be from the factory. I just had a sub installed in my car last week and it is a night and day difference. Other than that, not sure I can say the ML system is worth $1k more.
What brand sub did you use and was it installed where the factory sub had been. Did the installer build a new box for the new sub? What amp? I am using a powered Rockford sub that hangs out in the cargo area. Much better than stock sub, which really has little output below 50-60 cycles. Thanks. Regards. Ned.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kenv
GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011)
22
03-03-17 01:31 AM
JP5gs
GS - 4th Gen (2013-2020)
10
07-30-13 09:11 AM
MercuryISF
IS F (2008-2014)
12
01-30-13 10:10 AM
fw1
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
10
06-20-07 02:43 PM
chocaholic
GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011)
18
05-25-07 01:55 PM



Quick Reply: Opinions on stereo



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:32 PM.