Cruising Range
Nearly all of my driving is on the highway, and I've been averaging 26 MPG or so on Minnesota's E-10 pseudogas. My trip computer says I've got about 390 miles range on a tank, and as I go along, it goes up (adding miles driven to estimated range). The highest total I've seen so far is 427.
I plan trips on 350 miles on a tank. Tomorrow, I leave for a long trip (2000 miles or so over two weeks), and it'll be interesting to see if the numbers hold up.
I plan trips on 350 miles on a tank. Tomorrow, I leave for a long trip (2000 miles or so over two weeks), and it'll be interesting to see if the numbers hold up.
I get on the highway and lock the cruise control at 70 MPH (usually; no more than 5 above the speed limit). I have noticed that mileage drops quickly as speed goes up. On one trip where I ran at 75 most of the way, it dropped to about 23 MPG. I've seen 29 when cruising at 65. The average for the long trip, most of it at 70, was 27.3. Computed range has gone as high as 475 miles.
I usually see about 350 when I refill. I average 24 mpg highway with the 10% ethanol crap and about 26 when I am away from the metro areas and use the real gasoline without ethanol.
I wonder if anyone ever did the math that would show that you have to use more gasoline with ethanol in it to go as far as you would with pure gasoline. I wonder which really pollutes the air more, especially when you add how much CO2 (>8 lb/gallon) is released when ethanol is produced.
Kind of odd now that everyone is concerned about greenhouse gas and global warming, and here we are rushing to produce tons of CO2.
Back on topic. The computer range is seems to adjust based on your driving habits and the mpg that is being calculated.
I wonder if anyone ever did the math that would show that you have to use more gasoline with ethanol in it to go as far as you would with pure gasoline. I wonder which really pollutes the air more, especially when you add how much CO2 (>8 lb/gallon) is released when ethanol is produced.
Kind of odd now that everyone is concerned about greenhouse gas and global warming, and here we are rushing to produce tons of CO2.
Back on topic. The computer range is seems to adjust based on your driving habits and the mpg that is being calculated.
My wife who i think has a lead foot averages about 13litres/100km. She does mostly highway driving, so this is really bothering me.
90% of her drive is highway and we're only getting 430km a tank before the light comes on. That's about 267miles.
90% of her drive is highway and we're only getting 430km a tank before the light comes on. That's about 267miles.
This weekend I went to Tahoe and back (just over 230 miles each way) and filled up twice. Each time the range estimator read 300 miles...obviously pessimistic. It was, as expected, very slow in counting down the miles. Even with conservative estimates (22mpg x 16 gal) I'd expect it to read > 300 miles. And since I averaged 26.2mpg on the way up and 28.1mpg on the way back, I did expect to read higher. Kind of interesting. I was really pleased with the mileage, though.
I behaved and kept it between 60 & 70mph, but still...climbing 6,800 feet over 230 miles and seeing 26.2mpg made my happy.
I behaved and kept it between 60 & 70mph, but still...climbing 6,800 feet over 230 miles and seeing 26.2mpg made my happy.
And since I averaged 26.2mpg on the way up and 28.1mpg on the way back, I did expect to read higher. Kind of interesting. I was really pleased with the mileage, though.
I behaved and kept it between 60 & 70mph, but still...climbing 6,800 feet over 230 miles and seeing 26.2mpg made my happy.
I behaved and kept it between 60 & 70mph, but still...climbing 6,800 feet over 230 miles and seeing 26.2mpg made my happy.Whole story here:
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=269112











