RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009) Discussion topics related to the 2004 -2009 RX330, RX350 and RX400H models
View Poll Results: What gas do you put into your 2RX?
Premium
0
0%
Medium
0
0%
Regular Unleaded
0
0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Do you need Premium Gas in the 2RX (merged discussion threads)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-13, 04:49 PM
  #571  
Formula271
Rookie
 
Formula271's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: MI
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Frayzn
This thread provided an itch of curiosity. I mentioned before what the difference in price would be between 93+ and 87. I've quoted it below to refresh your memory.



I had to drive to St. Louis a few days ago and I took the RX. I started on empty and filled up with 87 at my local Shell station. I put in 14.8 gallons at $3.399. This was a total of $50.31 price paid. On the trip there, there was a small crosswind over I-70, blowing at about 5 kn to from southwest to northeast. I was traveling West. The total trip was 268 miles. I used 14.1 gallons, averaging 19 MPG.

Driving around the city, I used most of the gasoline in the tank. I filled up again, at a Shell, right before I left to head home. This time I put in 93+ fuel. I put in 15 gallons at $3.52. This was a total of $52.80. On the drive home, there was a stiffer crosswind, blowing at roughly at 8 kn North to South. I was heading East. Driving the same route home, the trip was 268 miles. I used 11.55 gallons, averaging 23.2 MPG.

This is where the math gets interesting, so bare with me.

Trip to St. Louis from Indianapolis
Distance: 268 Miles
Fuel: Shell 87 @ $3.399
Fuel Used: 14.1G
MPG: 19

Total Cost: (14.1G @ $3.399) $47.93

Trip from St. Louis back to Indianapolis
Distance: 268 Miles
Fuel: Shell 93+ V-Power @ $3.529
Fuel Used: 11.55G
MPG: 23.2

Total Cost: (11.55G @ $3.529) $40.76

Analysis
Total Cost at Pump
Regular: $50.31
Premium: $52.80

Total Savings Using Regular: $2.49

Total Fuel Costs for Trip
Regular: $47.93
Premium: $40.76

Total Savings Using Premium: $7.17

Total Net Savings Using Premium: $4.68

I think this speaks for itself. Premium fuel runs cleaner, yields higher performance, is recommended for your engine, and saves you money in the long term. Don't pinch pennies at the pump, because you'll spend more in the end.

Though to thoroughly prove this, more testing would need to be done; however, the wind was even in favor of the regular (87 Octane) gasoline. This is proof enough for me. I hope this wasn't a waste of time to read for you.
Please reconsider your math...

Your savings is the full $7.17. There is no need to subtract your cost "penalty" for filling-up with premium.
Old 04-10-13, 05:41 PM
  #572  
Frayzn
Driver School Candidate
 
Frayzn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: IN
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I only did that as a penalty for that trip. I understand in future instances there would be no penalty.

Thanks for your input, though!
Old 04-11-13, 06:52 AM
  #573  
Adamjeeps
Lead Lap
 
Adamjeeps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The elevation of St. Louis is 465 feet. The elevation of Indianapolis is 715 feet. Just making sure this was not a factor. In fact, it looks like the premium trip was slightly more uphill than the regular unleaded trip.
Old 04-11-13, 01:36 PM
  #574  
DPJ
Driver School Candidate
 
DPJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Frayzn
I think this speaks for itself. Premium fuel runs cleaner, yields higher performance, is recommended for your engine, and saves you money in the long term. Don't pinch pennies at the pump, because you'll spend more in the end.
Your math is fine but the premise that premium is cheaper in the long run requires further study.
One trip in two different directions, under different conditions means very little. I tried a tank of 93 vs 87 and my mileage stayed the same at 19.5.
Contact a fleet owner with a few thousand vehicles and see what they have to say.
Old 04-11-13, 05:06 PM
  #575  
daryll40
Pole Position
 
daryll40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,008
Received 409 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

The inside rear cover of my "2006 Lexus Owner's Manual, RX330", says this" FUEL SELECTION: Premium unleaded gasoline with an Octane Rating of 91 (Research Octane Number 96) or higher required for optimum engine performance. However, if such premium type cannot be obtained, you may use unleaded gasoline with an Octane Rating as low as 87 (Research Octane Number 91).

So why are you guys talking like 87 gas is the default mode? It is not; 91 octane gas is. That being said, I generally use 89 and sometimes 87 and at (a mere) 60,000 miles have seen no problem. But the default gas is 91 octane. Or maybe I'm missing something?
Old 04-11-13, 05:35 PM
  #576  
RX330inFL
Lead Lap
 
RX330inFL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 3,999
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daryll40
The inside rear cover of my "2006 Lexus Owner's Manual, RX330", says this" FUEL SELECTION: Premium unleaded gasoline with an Octane Rating of 91 (Research Octane Number 96) or higher required for optimum engine performance. However, if such premium type cannot be obtained, you may use unleaded gasoline with an Octane Rating as low as 87 (Research Octane Number 91).

So why are you guys talking like 87 gas is the default mode? It is not; 91 octane gas is. That being said, I generally use 89 and sometimes 87 and at (a mere) 60,000 miles have seen no problem. But the default gas is 91 octane. Or maybe I'm missing something?
They changed the wording in the Owner's Manual for the 2006 model year, daryll40. For 2004 it states:

Octane rating
Select Octane Rating 87 (Research Octane Number 91) or
higher. For improved vehicle performance, the use of
premium unleaded gasoline with an Octane Rating of 91
(Research Octane Number 96) or higher is recommended.


http://drivers.lexus.com/t3Portal/do...004rx33/62.pdf

Why I have cautioned in the past that what is true for one is not necessarily true for another here at CL when it comes to such matters.
Old 04-11-13, 05:36 PM
  #577  
DPJ
Driver School Candidate
 
DPJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=daryll40;7878860] FUEL SELECTION: Premium unleaded gasoline with an Octane Rating of 91 (Research Octane Number 96) or higher required for optimum engine performance. /QUOTE]

I am using 87 because I drive it like a grandma (it's her car) so I'm not after optimum engine performance. It is my understanding that the engine management will prevent any harm to the engine. It's reasonable to expect performance as in 0-60 times will suffer.
Old 04-11-13, 05:41 PM
  #578  
daryll40
Pole Position
 
daryll40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,008
Received 409 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Interesting that the instructions changed from '04 to '06. I wonder if there are any actual engines changes or if they found that 87 would cause harm over long periods of use...or if they just are doing CYA. Or if they got complaints of sluggishness and this was a "cheap fix". Or if they got more MPGs (or even fractions of an MPG) by recommending 91 as the default?
Old 04-11-13, 05:59 PM
  #579  
RX330inFL
Lead Lap
 
RX330inFL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 3,999
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daryll40
Interesting that the instructions changed from '04 to '06. I wonder if there are any actual engines changes or if they found that 87 would cause harm over long periods of use...or if they just are doing CYA. Or if they got complaints of sluggishness and this was a "cheap fix". Or if they got more MPGs (or even fractions of an MPG) by recommending 91 as the default?
While I am unaware of any specific changes made to the 3.3L engine for 2006, the specs did change between the '2004-2005 model years and the 2006 model year. There was a slight drop in the horsepower and torque ratings for 2006.

2004:
http://www.edmunds.com/lexus/rx-330/...ml?style=&sub=
2005:
http://www.edmunds.com/lexus/rx-330/...ml?style=&sub=
2006:
http://www.edmunds.com/lexus/rx-330/...ml?style=&sub=

They may have been looking for solutions to make customers happy with the complaints regarding the transmission's slow shifts and other performance issues.

The 2005 Owner's Manual reads the same as the 2004. When I researched the OP's question I made sure to go online at Lexus to check to see what his Owner's Manual stated for his vehicle.
Old 04-11-13, 06:17 PM
  #580  
daryll40
Pole Position
 
daryll40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,008
Received 409 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

My guess is that, based on this, 87 will work fine if you don't care about power. I do wonder what the exact MPG difference is between 91 and 87 under exactly equal conditions. Since our driving is variable, I can't tell for sure. It coudk be that 91 or even 93 is actually cheaper. Or not.
Old 04-11-13, 07:11 PM
  #581  
RX330inFL
Lead Lap
 
RX330inFL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 3,999
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daryll40
My guess is that, based on this, 87 will work fine if you don't care about power. I do wonder what the exact MPG difference is between 91 and 87 under exactly equal conditions. Since our driving is variable, I can't tell for sure. It coudk be that 91 or even 93 is actually cheaper. Or not.
Over the years I tested running multiple tanks of 93 octane, we do not get 91 here in FL at the stations I frequent, and then followed by multiple tanks of 87 octane for my day-to-day driving needs. The differences were statistically insignificant for my needs.

Now, as I have stated previous when I travel to PA and will be up in the mountains with a fully loaded vehicle I am more likely to run 89 or 93 octane. Not unusual for me to put in 3K miles on such a trip and traveling to some of the higher locations in PA (highest east of the Mississippi), up and down the hills on the back roads, pretty much circling the state making stops with friends and family along the way.
Old 04-11-13, 07:18 PM
  #582  
daryll40
Pole Position
 
daryll40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,008
Received 409 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

I still would like to hear from others regarding MPG at 87 and 91 or 93. As an aside, I often will estimate how much of the about 19 gallon tank is empty, then fill about half of that with 93 octane and finish with 87. I end up with 90 octane that's about the same price or even a penny per two gallon less than the "poorest value" 89 octane. A little more work (two transactions) and probably silly. But, hey, that's how I accumulated enough to drive Lexi!

Last edited by daryll40; 04-11-13 at 07:29 PM.
Old 04-11-13, 07:46 PM
  #583  
RX330inFL
Lead Lap
 
RX330inFL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 3,999
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daryll40
I still would like to hear from others regarding MPG at 87 and 91 or 93. As an aside, I often will estimate how much of the about 19 gallon tank is empty, then fillt about half of that with 93 octane and finish with 87. I end up with 90 octane that's about the same price or even a penny per two gallon less than the "poorest value" 89 octane. A little more work (two transactions) and probably silly. But, hey, that's how I accumulated enough to drive Lexi!
Looking at such data is nonsensical without correlation to additional data on driving habits and location. I would not expect to see anything useful in the data between what I would see here in FL when compared to the OP's situation living in CO no matter the octane fuel used, as an example. You would be better off experimenting on your own to see what results you get.

Regarding your last statement, I see people driving Lexus vehicles all the time shopping at Walmart. Now, do they drive a Lexus because they shop at Walmart, or do they shop at Walmart because they drive a Lexus?
Old 04-11-13, 08:01 PM
  #584  
daryll40
Pole Position
 
daryll40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,008
Received 409 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RX330inFL
Looking at such data is nonsensical without correlation to additional data on driving habits and location. I would not expect to see anything useful in the data between what I would see here in FL when compared to the OP's situation living in CO no matter the octane fuel used, as an example. You would be better off experimenting on your own to see what results you get.

Regarding your last statement, I see people driving Lexus vehicles all the time shopping at Walmart. Now, do they drive a Lexus because they shop at Walmart, or do they shop at Walmart because they drive a Lexus?
Yup. You'll see my Lexi there, too. We have them partially because we shop at Walmart.
Old 04-12-13, 06:18 AM
  #585  
JLeffler
Rookie
 
JLeffler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: CO
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RX330inFL
No need to stalk. I spent some time at the Academy. Only a few real metros in the state. If you asked someone on the street in any place other than CO to name a city in CO you would more than likely get Denver as your answer and not Vail, Colorado Springs, or Fort Collins. .
I'm teasing of course. It was just funny to me.


Quick Reply: Do you need Premium Gas in the 2RX (merged discussion threads)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:58 AM.