RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009) Discussion topics related to the 2004 -2009 RX330, RX350 and RX400H models

2009 RX350 to 2015 RX350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-16, 07:21 AM
  #1  
pauljcl
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
pauljcl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default 2009 RX350 to 2015 RX350

I am thinking of 'upgrading' to a 2015 (slightly used) from my (used - 48K miles - as close to 'perfect' as can be) 2009 RX350, if the price the dealer gives me is right for me. Does anyone know of any problems with the 2015 RX350 that I should be aware of?
[I note that I have always had very good luck with cars at the end of their cycle. By then, they are usually well sorted, and usually have very few to no problems for a very long time. The 2015 RX is the last of its generation/cycle, and I REALLY don't like the new 2016 re-design.]
Thanks for any comments....
Old 02-18-16, 09:39 AM
  #2  
mandyfig
Moderator
 
mandyfig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 12,298
Received 407 Likes on 359 Posts
Default

2015 and 2016 models use the same engine still, 3.5 liter. Your 2009 uses the same engine as well.

From what I have heard fro TECHS the 3.5 is a good reliable engine.
Old 02-18-16, 10:00 AM
  #3  
pauljcl
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
pauljcl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mandyfig
2015 and 2016 models use the same engine still, 3.5 liter. Your 2009 uses the same engine as well.

From what I have heard fro TECHS the 3.5 is a good reliable engine.
Hi Mandyfig! Yes, it is a very reliable (except for the oil connection) engine, said to be able to do 250K miles without a problem. I have zero oil consumption with 48K miles. As a side-note, the 2015 is said to require 'regular' gasoline, not 'premium' gasoline. I guess Lexus heard the comments of its unhappy customers. But I was really curious as to the other features of the RX. The 2015 seems to have a little more equipment as standard, and I remember reading somewhere in 2010 that the then-new RX has less parts in common with the Toyota Highlander, which I view as disadvantage rather than an advantage. The 2015 is a little heavier, too.
Old 02-25-16, 03:21 PM
  #4  
lexsc4
Instructor
 
lexsc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: N. CA
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 180 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

My 2 cents. My coworker has a 2012 model and to me the ride a little more stiffer than my wife's 09. Maybe it's the 19" compare to our 18" wheel. That was the main reason we chose the 09 instead of picking up an 11/12 a couple of years ago, plus a good chunk of saving. Her next car in a couple of years will probably be the NX200t or 300h. Seems like the 16 RX maybe a little too big for her.
Old 02-29-16, 01:49 AM
  #5  
hisstojay
Pole Position
 
hisstojay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: LA
Posts: 214
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

The 2015 as I learnt (from several reviews) has quite an extensive infotainment and techs than the 2009; by and large both still have 3.5 liter displacement engine.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
okc329
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
2
05-06-13 11:09 AM
yusef
Car Chat
40
02-19-09 05:08 PM
LexFather
Car Chat
7
08-08-08 12:27 AM
mcgrady
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
98
03-18-08 02:12 PM



Quick Reply: 2009 RX350 to 2015 RX350



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:41 PM.