Rcf te mini film
Great video showcasing V8 sound and experience.
It is funny seeing the backlash on AMG Forums against the new C63 AMG. People were chasing numbers so Mercedes made a C63 AMG with 0-60 mph in 3.4 seconds using a 4-cylinder engine (though, it weighs nearly 5000 lbs) and suddenly all of the AMG fans are crying "C63 was never about the numbers or the horsepower. It was always about the V8 roar and the fun of driving and being a hooligan" etc.
It is funny seeing the backlash on AMG Forums against the new C63 AMG. People were chasing numbers so Mercedes made a C63 AMG with 0-60 mph in 3.4 seconds using a 4-cylinder engine (though, it weighs nearly 5000 lbs) and suddenly all of the AMG fans are crying "C63 was never about the numbers or the horsepower. It was always about the V8 roar and the fun of driving and being a hooligan" etc.
Great video showcasing V8 sound and experience.
It is funny seeing the backlash on AMG Forums against the new C63 AMG. People were chasing numbers so Mercedes made a C63 AMG with 0-60 mph in 3.4 seconds using a 4-cylinder engine (though, it weighs nearly 5000 lbs) and suddenly all of the AMG fans are crying "C63 was never about the numbers or the horsepower. It was always about the V8 roar and the fun of driving and being a hooligan" etc.
It is funny seeing the backlash on AMG Forums against the new C63 AMG. People were chasing numbers so Mercedes made a C63 AMG with 0-60 mph in 3.4 seconds using a 4-cylinder engine (though, it weighs nearly 5000 lbs) and suddenly all of the AMG fans are crying "C63 was never about the numbers or the horsepower. It was always about the V8 roar and the fun of driving and being a hooligan" etc.
Lotus got it right...it's not the stats....it's the ride.
Last edited by 05RollaXRS; Feb 22, 2023 at 09:17 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GSoup
NELOC
46
Apr 1, 2008 10:39 AM
RAMPAGEsd
CL of Southern California
3
Jun 18, 2007 10:23 PM
1QWKLEX
Southwest
20
Oct 22, 2005 05:18 PM








