Performance & Maintenance Engine, forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

'92 SC300 with high NOX --failed smog today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-10, 12:44 AM
  #1  
Michael56
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default '92 SC300 with high NOX --failed smog today

My '92 SC300 5-spd failed on NOX numbers (3X the maximum allowed). The HC and CO were low, so I'm suspecting the modulator.

WTB--Anyone have one laying around for cheap? -- I want to try it before digging deeper.

I live in the Concord/Pleasant Hill area (East Bay-NorCal). After the test failing I dumped a bottle of that CRC product in the tank that says it will help you pass, and was thinking about pouring a gallon of Acetone in the tank before my free re-rest (read about that here on the forum). Is that move considered by you guys an effective one to get this through?

The car has 196K on it now, but I rebuilt the engine from the Crankshaft- up-- about 15K miles ago. The last smog test right after that rebuild was super clean.

I had bought, and rebuilt a used JDM engine, and remember the cross drilling from the #6 cylinder exhaust port-to the rear face of the cylinder head was of a much smaller diameter than the original cylinder head (of course-the JDM engine had a EGR blanking plate there). I had just transferred over the EGR plate from my old US spec engine, and not thought much about it. But-- it did throw the CEL light at anything over 4000 rpm, right after the rebuild. I jumped the test port connectors to get the flash code, which was a EGR fault. But-- the engine had always run great, and I just took off the negative battery terminal for a re-set, and drove it to the test station under 4000 rpm and it passed 2 years ago with great numbers.

I assumed that would be the case today-- but....no dice.

Any advice is welcome.

Thanks,
Mike
Old 10-29-10, 04:55 PM
  #2  
Michael56
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I'm thinking it's a bad EGR VM

I'm looking for opinions here. Today I used a pistol-style vacuum pump -- attached to the EGR dashpot with the engine idling. When I pulled even a little vacuum with the pump the engine started stumbling. As I released the vacuum and watched the gage -- when it returned to zero the idle returned to a very smooth condition.

So-- I'm thinking it is the EGR VM with the three hoses running to it.

Any opinions one way or another?

I'm hoping there are not electrical components (as I see the EGR valve has a two-wire lead going to it) that are the real cause for why it's not opening as designed.
Old 11-05-10, 05:21 PM
  #3  
Michael56
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1992 SC300 --Passed CA Smog --- but lesson learned

Well -- a very helpful Club member sold me a good EGR Vacuum Module, as mine failed a test with my vacuum pump. I dumped in a bottle of CRC- guaranteed to pass- product, and drove about a half tank of fuel thru it.

Before this--the first failed test had me at 3600/3300 on Nox, against a max allowed of approx. 700. (A flagged "Gross Polluter" in CA) --I should have remembered that number, though.

So I took it back for the free re-test today even though I hadn't burned thru all the fuel with the treatment in it and then re-filled with premium as recommended.

This time--I barely failed on the low (15mph on the dyno) Nox at 654 -- even though it was a huge reduction from the previous number. Hc and CO were all well below the max allowed.

So-- I'm thinking that I just should have waited and followed thru with the CRC deal..... until I started thinking about the 2nd test value -- and pulled out the paperwork for a side-by-side look.

That's when I saw that he had entered my car as a auto trans model (with lower max numbers allowed) instead of a 5-spd. It would have passed!

So one more trip, I explained his error and he re-ran it. And -- it passed!

Lesson learned? -- read the fine print before leaving the Counter.

I'm confident that the Nox values will continue to drop now, and that the Cat's are still fairly healthy.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scorp805
Performance & Maintenance
2
08-23-13 10:49 AM
Mr Soarer
Lexus Vehicles Classifieds
0
03-18-08 07:46 PM
Xevuhtess7
SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)
28
02-03-05 09:29 AM



Quick Reply: '92 SC300 with high NOX --failed smog today



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:32 PM.