Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Effects on increasing exhaust size in steps?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 08:55 AM
  #16  
cip's Avatar
cip
Pole Position
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Chicago 'burbs
Default

Originally Posted by Sly Guy Yu
2.5" + xpipe + the stock muffflers. I'm running stock headers, so the 2.5" piping wont be used to its full potential. w/ the xpipe and the stock mufflers it should be even more restrictive, there fore if anything it willbe just a bit overkill.
yeah, but you have a 290 HP w/ vvt-i, not 250 HP no vvt-i. I think that would make a difference right there, no?
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:23 AM
  #17  
Sly Guy Yu's Avatar
Sly Guy Yu
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by cip
yeah, but you have a 290 HP w/ vvt-i, not 250 HP no vvt-i. I think that would make a difference right there, no?

True, but i dont understand how you guys are using HP ratings to determine piping diameter. I dont have much experience w/ the technical part but i can think critically about it. I am still a 4liter that revs up to 6000rpm.

At first i wanted 2.25 piping, but the place where i go to only has 2.5" mandrel bent piping. Ive done some research, the stock mufflers arent a straight through design, so that should give some backpressure, as well as the stock headers and cats. My setup will be louder than i want, low end will be a bit weaker, but my highend will be much better.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 12:05 PM
  #18  
Luke_in_SD's Avatar
Luke_in_SD
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

getting mandrel bent piping made is overkill for a stock N/A motor
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 09:03 PM
  #19  
Blizzy's Avatar
Blizzy
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 2
From: IN
Default

Originally Posted by Sly Guy Yu
True, but i dont understand how you guys are using HP ratings to determine piping diameter. I dont have much experience w/ the technical part but i can think critically about it. I am still a 4liter that revs up to 6000rpm.

At first i wanted 2.25 piping, but the place where i go to only has 2.5" mandrel bent piping. Ive done some research, the stock mufflers arent a straight through design, so that should give some backpressure, as well as the stock headers and cats. My setup will be louder than i want, low end will be a bit weaker, but my highend will be much better.
The requirement of 2.0-2.3CFM/hp is not a stat that is being contrived. It is a standard that is tried and true.

Using these numbers:
- 2.5" duals will present no obstruction to flow with a 450+hp engine
- 2.25" duals will present no obstruction to flow with a 320+hp engine
- 2" duals will present no obstruction to flow with a 240+hp engine

It is preferred to offer your engine the smallest possible pipe that will not obstruct exhaust flow. This will ensure that at high rpms, your exhaust piping will capacitate the maximum flow. But, more importantly, it will ensure that at low rpms, your exhaust piping will offer your exhaust gases the best chance to maintain their momentum. This contriction without restriction philosophy ensures gains will be actualized across the entire power band.

2.25" piping is still top end biased. You will pull very hard from 4-6k rpms, perhaps even harder than in the 2.5" system. However, you will be assured to get to 4k rpms significantly quicker with the 2.25" piping.

Also, take a look at the stock mufflers. They are essentially a straight-through design.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 02:21 AM
  #20  
Maeve's Avatar
Maeve
Instructor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 812
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

Great discussion, guys.
I've been following this thread since in the beginning and I am learning a lot.
Thank you.

----

Stephen,

This muffler shop offers 2.25 mandrel bend. They are located in Bakersfield.
http://www.bobsmuffler.com/index.html
It is only a few hours driving from Los Angeles.
Perhaps you should give them a call for a quote.

----

I think Blizzy is correct about getting "the smallest possible pipe that will not obstruct exhaust flow". The 2.25 pipe is the best to maintain the powerband gain. I found an info about it from "bobs muffler" site above:

This information is provided as a guideline to pipe size selection for peak performance at full throttle levels. For vehicles that are street driven on a daily basis, consider using the next smaller pipe diameter for best results.

Smaller diameter pipes will produce low-to mid-RPM torque.
Larger diameters produce mid-to high RPM torque.



------

Bigger is NOT ALWAYS better !!

As a general rule, you can enlarge the pipe diameter of your O.E.M. exhaust system by 1/4 to 3/4 inch to increase horsepower. However, any additional increase in pipe diameter is likely to decrease your performance. Improving performance is more about improving air flow than about enlarging pipe diameters.
Hope that helps.

- Dom -
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 05:35 AM
  #21  
Blizzy's Avatar
Blizzy
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 2
From: IN
Default

Dom-

Great addition to the thread.

Airflow is definitely all about maintaining momentum. Big pipe hurts this by presenting gases room to expand and scatter. Small pipe hurts this by obstructing flow when the car is exhausting the most air. Choosing the proper pipe diameter is the most influential exhaust decision.

Notice the chart saying 2.5" is large enough for a single exhaust in a 4.0L engine with 250hp. Area=(pi)*(r)^2. Increasing radius definitely increases pipe cross sectional area exponentially.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 08:35 AM
  #22  
The Ikon's Avatar
The Ikon
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,506
Likes: 26
From: Mississippi
Default

Originally Posted by Skip Star
Here's a question...
What is the stock OD of the exhaust pipe throughout?
I bought my two Magnaflow cats online and they are suppossed to be stock replacements. They are 2" in/out as quoted from their web page. So is the whole system 2"?

And look what I just found. This is interesting...

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/eng.../photo_19.html

Maybe I'll try 2.25" from x-pipe to 3.25" Flow Master muffers...
This sounds like an interesting theory.. from pophotrod... I wonder about loudness/tone of the exhaust in normal driving ranges? What do you guys think?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 09:04 AM
  #23  
The Ikon's Avatar
The Ikon
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,506
Likes: 26
From: Mississippi
Default

Originally Posted by Lexmex
I have done some increases in my exhaust pipes over the years and I have documented the changes on page 3 of my site below...not sure if that will help, but I have noted my comments there.
Nice info on your site!!!
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 09:31 AM
  #24  
Sly Guy Yu's Avatar
Sly Guy Yu
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

Thx for the info guys. The exhaust shop that i go to doesnt have 2.25 mandrel bent piping, hopefully i can find something closer to home to do this setup. I was quoted 2.5in mandrel aluminized piping+2 o2 bungs + hpipe from the stock cats to the stock mufflers for 350. But i will most likely pursue the 2.25 now. THX!
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #25  
jgscott's Avatar
jgscott
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,619
Likes: 1,943
From: GA
Default

X Pipe on a " STOCK " SC400 = HP LOSS and messed up power Band.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 11:06 PM
  #26  
Skip Star's Avatar
Skip Star
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by jgscott
X Pipe on a " STOCK " SC400 = HP LOSS and messed up power Band.
How so? Pray tell...
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 03:41 AM
  #27  
94lex83457's Avatar
94lex83457
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: OR
Default

I had this idea for awhile, and I think it would make more sense on a 400. How about side pipes? Summit racing sells universal ones, and they look awesome (IMHO) on long wheelbase cars.

While I own a 300, i'm looking for the same exhaust "style" as skip: kinda quiet up to 3K and after that let it be as loud as it wants...without losing torque.

great thread
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 02:21 PM
  #28  
Blizzy's Avatar
Blizzy
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 2
From: IN
Default

Originally Posted by jgscott
X Pipe on a " STOCK " SC400 = HP LOSS and messed up power Band.
Why would you say this? What is your justification?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 03:02 PM
  #29  
jgscott's Avatar
jgscott
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,619
Likes: 1,943
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by Blizzy
Why would you say this? What is your justification?
Research, Cam Timing Principles, and Experience.

BTW, find " ONE " Dyno on the SC 400 that shows a X pipe shows increased HP across the Rev Range.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 11:02 PM
  #30  
The Ikon's Avatar
The Ikon
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,506
Likes: 26
From: Mississippi
Default

Post some pics when you get it done..
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:08 AM.