Late-model CR-V vs 2016/17 NX?
#1
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Late-model CR-V vs 2016/17 NX?
Hi all, this is my first post!
I am the original owner of a geriatric 2005 ES330. It has been very good to me, requiring its first "major" repair after 10 years of near-daily service (which cost under $400). My goals are problem-free, long-term operation. Now that the sun roof motor, back windows, AC, some speakers, and some additional mechanical item have failed, it is time to retire her and move on.
The NX has fascinated me since I first saw it at an auto show in 2014, and I've been thinking about an SUV ever since.
When I started looking recently, I initially ruled out Lexus (because of perceived higher cost than I wanted) and ruled in CPO rather than new. I looked at Kia, Toyota, Hyundai, and Honda. To my surprise, I liked the CR-V best.
But when I started looking at prices of CPO Honda CR-V, they started bumping up around the same as the 2016/17 CPO NX! Looking for low miles in all cases.
Now, I realize that Honda and Lexus are not really in the same class. However, since I haven't purchased a car in 13.5 years, the interiors and technology are all on par with Star Trek to me.
They both seem to have pluses and minuses. However, I am alarmed at the problem reports of the Honda 1.5L Turbo engines - and more alarmed at Honda's treatment of their US customers both on this issue and the battery issue (where the battery drains due to some post-power sensor that runs continuously). Although, I think, a vast majority of CR-V owners do not have either issue so far as I can tell.
So my question is this: is there any reason to consider a newer (17/18/19) CR-V over an older (16/17) NX?
Thanks for any wisdom, thoughts, pontificating, experiences, or hearsay you can provide!
I am the original owner of a geriatric 2005 ES330. It has been very good to me, requiring its first "major" repair after 10 years of near-daily service (which cost under $400). My goals are problem-free, long-term operation. Now that the sun roof motor, back windows, AC, some speakers, and some additional mechanical item have failed, it is time to retire her and move on.
The NX has fascinated me since I first saw it at an auto show in 2014, and I've been thinking about an SUV ever since.
When I started looking recently, I initially ruled out Lexus (because of perceived higher cost than I wanted) and ruled in CPO rather than new. I looked at Kia, Toyota, Hyundai, and Honda. To my surprise, I liked the CR-V best.
But when I started looking at prices of CPO Honda CR-V, they started bumping up around the same as the 2016/17 CPO NX! Looking for low miles in all cases.
Now, I realize that Honda and Lexus are not really in the same class. However, since I haven't purchased a car in 13.5 years, the interiors and technology are all on par with Star Trek to me.
They both seem to have pluses and minuses. However, I am alarmed at the problem reports of the Honda 1.5L Turbo engines - and more alarmed at Honda's treatment of their US customers both on this issue and the battery issue (where the battery drains due to some post-power sensor that runs continuously). Although, I think, a vast majority of CR-V owners do not have either issue so far as I can tell.
So my question is this: is there any reason to consider a newer (17/18/19) CR-V over an older (16/17) NX?
Thanks for any wisdom, thoughts, pontificating, experiences, or hearsay you can provide!
#2
I cannot speak on longevity or reliability to either vehicle. but, we tint hundreds of CRV's and very few NX's. I myself own a 2019 NX F Sport AWD and it is honestly the "perfect" vehicle for ME. while I know it won't be for everyone, it fits my needs and wants to a T.
now, if I had to choose one over the other, NX all the way. no question. the interior is much nicer in the NX than the CRV. Honda makes a quality vehicle for sure, but they aren't a "premium" brand like Lexus. If you were comparing a Rav4 to the CRV, I would say CRV every time. but for me, the NX would win out. again, this is only my opinion. good luck with whichever you choose.
now, if I had to choose one over the other, NX all the way. no question. the interior is much nicer in the NX than the CRV. Honda makes a quality vehicle for sure, but they aren't a "premium" brand like Lexus. If you were comparing a Rav4 to the CRV, I would say CRV every time. but for me, the NX would win out. again, this is only my opinion. good luck with whichever you choose.
#5
I have a family member with a 2018 CR-V, it is a little bigger in size, and it does feel lighter when accelerating/handling. Also note that it’s a CVT but you do get Apple CarPlay and adaptive cruise control, pre collision and features like that standard. If you don’t care about those things i’d pick the NX any day. it’s a complete different feeling driving the two.
#6
You’ll see far fewer NXs on the road if that matters to you. CRVs are a dime a dozen. It’s a perfectly fine vehicle but there are just so many of them. I like something with a little more style.
#7
Lexus Test Driver
Let me caveat by saying I own a 16 LX570 and love Lexus. I also own a 18 CRV EX-L as a daily driver. For my money, CRV all the way.
CRV
PROS: Comes with adaptive cruise, lane keep assist, Apple Carplay and hits 34mpg highway
CONS: Louder than the NX, the interior is lower quality comparably,
NX
PROS: Lexus dealer network, better interior (i.e. leather) quality
CONS: Infuriating infotainment, no advanced safety features or Carplay, lower mpg
I personally find the NX a shoddy ride and does not have the traditional "Lexus" polish (quiet comfortable ride). If anything, compare a RX and CRV.
I also don't have any issues on battery drain or the 1.5L turbo engine issue; you can get a new EX-L for ~$27k (FWD) or Touring for $30k.
CRV
PROS: Comes with adaptive cruise, lane keep assist, Apple Carplay and hits 34mpg highway
CONS: Louder than the NX, the interior is lower quality comparably,
NX
PROS: Lexus dealer network, better interior (i.e. leather) quality
CONS: Infuriating infotainment, no advanced safety features or Carplay, lower mpg
I personally find the NX a shoddy ride and does not have the traditional "Lexus" polish (quiet comfortable ride). If anything, compare a RX and CRV.
I also don't have any issues on battery drain or the 1.5L turbo engine issue; you can get a new EX-L for ~$27k (FWD) or Touring for $30k.
Trending Topics
#8
Let me caveat by saying I own a 16 LX570 and love Lexus. I also own a 18 CRV EX-L as a daily driver. For my money, CRV all the way.
CRV
PROS: Comes with adaptive cruise, lane keep assist, Apple Carplay and hits 34mpg highway
CONS: Louder than the NX, the interior is lower quality comparably,
NX
PROS: Lexus dealer network, better interior (i.e. leather) quality
CONS: Infuriating infotainment, no advanced safety features or Carplay, lower mpg
I personally find the NX a shoddy ride and does not have the traditional "Lexus" polish (quiet comfortable ride). If anything, compare a RX and CRV.
I also don't have any issues on battery drain or the 1.5L turbo engine issue; you can get a new EX-L for ~$27k (FWD) or Touring for $30k.
CRV
PROS: Comes with adaptive cruise, lane keep assist, Apple Carplay and hits 34mpg highway
CONS: Louder than the NX, the interior is lower quality comparably,
NX
PROS: Lexus dealer network, better interior (i.e. leather) quality
CONS: Infuriating infotainment, no advanced safety features or Carplay, lower mpg
I personally find the NX a shoddy ride and does not have the traditional "Lexus" polish (quiet comfortable ride). If anything, compare a RX and CRV.
I also don't have any issues on battery drain or the 1.5L turbo engine issue; you can get a new EX-L for ~$27k (FWD) or Touring for $30k.
Yes an RX is a better vehicle but it's more expensive. It's also much larger.
A person really just has to drive them.
The following users liked this post:
corinvest (05-12-19)
#9
Let me caveat by saying I own a 16 LX570 and love Lexus. I also own a 18 CRV EX-L as a daily driver. For my money, CRV all the way.
CRV
PROS: Comes with adaptive cruise, lane keep assist, Apple Carplay and hits 34mpg highway
CONS: Louder than the NX, the interior is lower quality comparably,
NX
PROS: Lexus dealer network, better interior (i.e. leather) quality
CONS: Infuriating infotainment, no advanced safety features or Carplay, lower mpg
I personally find the NX a shoddy ride and does not have the traditional "Lexus" polish (quiet comfortable ride). If anything, compare a RX and CRV.
I also don't have any issues on battery drain or the 1.5L turbo engine issue; you can get a new EX-L for ~$27k (FWD) or Touring for $30k.
CRV
PROS: Comes with adaptive cruise, lane keep assist, Apple Carplay and hits 34mpg highway
CONS: Louder than the NX, the interior is lower quality comparably,
NX
PROS: Lexus dealer network, better interior (i.e. leather) quality
CONS: Infuriating infotainment, no advanced safety features or Carplay, lower mpg
I personally find the NX a shoddy ride and does not have the traditional "Lexus" polish (quiet comfortable ride). If anything, compare a RX and CRV.
I also don't have any issues on battery drain or the 1.5L turbo engine issue; you can get a new EX-L for ~$27k (FWD) or Touring for $30k.
#10
Funny thing is in my city, I see more NX, IS and RX models on the road more than any of the newer Honda CR-V and Accord models.
#12
#13
#14
Lead Lap
In the US, for the 2015 and 2016 model years, NXs with the various safety features were quite rare. Most of the NXs with the radar cruise, auto braking, blind spot monitor, etc. were NXs with the Luxury package, and Luxury package NXs were only a small percent of all of the NXs that were shipped to dealers. By the 2017 model year, most (perhaps, all) Lexus models had the Safety System + (radar cruise, collision avoidance, etc.) as standard equipment, and the separate safety options, like the blind spot monitor, were included on most cars that were shipped to dealers for all of the Lexus models.
#15
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Thanks all for the input! I had a feeling that the NX might not be completely up to the Lexus standard (at least as far as I experienced in my ES). I test-drove both a CR-V EX-L and a 2017 NX.
The Lexus representative, who didn't have much to say overall, told me that there was no difference between any of the NX models from 2016-2019. Based on my research, that is very far from true. Maybe in terms of the driving experience and engine performance?!
I'm not very concerned with driving distinction with a "common" car, so that is not part of my consideration.
The main point of contention in my mind is that a 2018/19 CR-V (new or low miles CPO - high trim) is very nearly the cost, or the same cost, as a 2016/17 NX... maybe a 2018, depending on what I can work out - somewhere around 27-30k.
The standard features of the CR-V are compelling - safety (as Wandl mentioned) and Carplay. But some of the interior does seem below par. The details on especially the safety features of the 16/17/18 NXs seem to be limited. I find cargurus.com have more details on these cars than the dealership sites themselves. And, I'm not sure how well they work in Lexus compared to Honda's implementation.
The Lexus representative, who didn't have much to say overall, told me that there was no difference between any of the NX models from 2016-2019. Based on my research, that is very far from true. Maybe in terms of the driving experience and engine performance?!
I'm not very concerned with driving distinction with a "common" car, so that is not part of my consideration.
The main point of contention in my mind is that a 2018/19 CR-V (new or low miles CPO - high trim) is very nearly the cost, or the same cost, as a 2016/17 NX... maybe a 2018, depending on what I can work out - somewhere around 27-30k.
The standard features of the CR-V are compelling - safety (as Wandl mentioned) and Carplay. But some of the interior does seem below par. The details on especially the safety features of the 16/17/18 NXs seem to be limited. I find cargurus.com have more details on these cars than the dealership sites themselves. And, I'm not sure how well they work in Lexus compared to Honda's implementation.