LX - 3rd Gen (2008-2021) Posts related to the LX570 belong in this forum

Premium fuel really needed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-18, 10:52 AM
  #166  
Max707
Lexus Champion
 
Max707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,728
Received 42 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

good info. I'm going to compromise and use regular every other fill up. Unless I have a heavy load or when temps are in the 90+ range or I'm going up mountains.
Old 01-26-18, 11:39 AM
  #167  
andreasP
Rookie
 
andreasP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: VA
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I had 2 bad experiences with regular gas on 2 turbo charged engines. In both cases, engine vibrations and hesitations were experienced. Since then, I started taking the recommendation for running premium seriously.
Old 01-26-18, 12:56 PM
  #168  
2008GS
Driver
 
2008GS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: TN
Posts: 177
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by REDHORSE
And here is the crux of the problem. All we have is anecdotal evidence, which is no evidence. Until I see results which are repeatable and repeated by others, conducted in a controlled environment, e.g. on a dyno, then I'll follow the information in the owners manual for whatever vehicle I'm driving.
I agree with this logic; everyone has theories. Why would Lexus recommend premium if it wasn't really needed? Are they in cahoots with the petroleum industry to sell higher priced fuel??? These are rhetorical questions because I will also use the manufacturers recommended grade fuel. The possibility of damaging the engine is too much of a risk for me.

Last edited by 2008GS; 01-26-18 at 01:02 PM.
Old 01-26-18, 01:20 PM
  #169  
Max707
Lexus Champion
 
Max707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,728
Received 42 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

We could be thinking about this backwards question could be why isn’t Land Cruiser and Toyota recommending 91 or requiring 91 octane in the Land Cruiser 5.7 is it because the vehicles it competes with burn 87 octane and Toyota knows that they can get a couple hundred thousand miles out of that engine even with damage long term from using to low of octane?
The following users liked this post:
2008GS (01-26-18)
Old 01-26-18, 01:58 PM
  #170  
I6turbo
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
I6turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by andreasP
I had 2 bad experiences with regular gas on 2 turbo charged engines. In both cases, engine vibrations and hesitations were experienced. Since then, I started taking the recommendation for running premium seriously.
I would not run regular in a turbo engine, even a stock one. I keep at least 108 Motor Octane in my Supra, and often 112 -116. Then again, I typically run 30-35 PSI boost, so the effective compression ratio is very high, and there's a lot of thermal load on the engine under maximum output.

Last edited by I6turbo; 01-26-18 at 02:02 PM.
Old 01-26-18, 06:03 PM
  #171  
REDHORSE
Pole Position
 
REDHORSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: LA
Posts: 241
Received 32 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Sorry, still anecdotal. Where are the facts, supported by scientific testing. Just one example, "Don't think this will void your warranty." Someone show me a test done on a dyno about how much horsepower is or is not produced and what the fuel consumption is. Then I'll begin to believe the car companies are wrong. Need so life of the car testing also. The impact may be small. Then a statistical analysis of the data so others can repeat the experiments. Otherwise it is all just internet gossip.
The following users liked this post:
Max707 (01-26-18)
Old 01-27-18, 08:59 AM
  #172  
hankinid
Pole Position
 
hankinid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,878
Received 424 Likes on 360 Posts
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by REDHORSE
Sorry, still anecdotal. Where are the facts, supported by scientific testing. Just one example, "Don't think this will void your warranty." Someone show me a test done on a dyno about how much horsepower is or is not produced and what the fuel consumption is. Then I'll begin to believe the car companies are wrong. Need so life of the car testing also. The impact may be small. Then a statistical analysis of the data so others can repeat the experiments. Otherwise it is all just internet gossip.
And even more "internet gossip" about regular gas destroying the engine. Any real time info on number of engines destroyed?
Old 01-27-18, 09:34 AM
  #173  
Htony
Lexus Champion
 
Htony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: AB
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 133 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Perpetual argument. Just every one do whatever one wants with one's own vehicle. gasoline, oil, tires,etc., etc. Let's move on to some other
meaningful issues. For me always I fill with Shell premium to keep my car's engine clean having DI engine. No comment please.
The following users liked this post:
Max707 (01-27-18)
Old 01-27-18, 07:32 PM
  #174  
I6turbo
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
I6turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

To be clear, the Tundra/Land Cruiser/LX 570 engine is not a direct injection engine.
The following users liked this post:
REDHORSE (01-28-18)
Old 02-01-18, 06:25 PM
  #175  
Reggie1
Intermediate
 
Reggie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 434
Received 99 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Based on availability at the times I need to re-fuel, I have run all grades of gasoline. I just do not subjectively feel any difference, even when towing my horses.
What objectively makes a difference is when running ethanol-free gasoline. With it I get 3+ miles more per gallon, based on the display screen. What is really nice is that increased MPG with ethanol-free for me translates into around 60 more miles of range.

About 300 miles range with ethanol bend vs 360 with ethanol-free..
Old 02-01-18, 10:27 PM
  #176  
hankinid
Pole Position
 
hankinid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,878
Received 424 Likes on 360 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Reggie1
Based on availability at the times I need to re-fuel, I have run all grades of gasoline. I just do not subjectively feel any difference, even when towing my horses.
What objectively makes a difference is when running ethanol-free gasoline. With it I get 3+ miles more per gallon, based on the display screen. What is really nice is that increased MPG with ethanol-free for me translates into around 60 more miles of range.

About 300 miles range with ethanol bend vs 360 with ethanol-free..
The engine ECU adjusts for whatever gasoline you use. I run 91 octane Sinclair ethanol-free...definitely kinder to the rubber in the fuel system

I've towed a 3-horse Charmac with a 17 hand hunter and a 15 hand appendix. No issues whatsoever, but I definitely wife's 3/4 ton Dodge with Cummins.
Old 02-02-18, 05:04 AM
  #177  
2008GS
Driver
 
2008GS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: TN
Posts: 177
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hankinid
The engine ECU adjusts for whatever gasoline you use. I run 91 octane Sinclair ethanol-free...definitely kinder to the rubber in the fuel system

I've towed a 3-horse Charmac with a 17 hand hunter and a 15 hand appendix. No issues whatsoever, but I definitely wife's 3/4 ton Dodge with Cummins.
I would expect more MPG with non Ethanol because ethanol provides less energy than pure fuel when burned.
Old 02-02-18, 01:30 PM
  #178  
REDHORSE
Pole Position
 
REDHORSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: LA
Posts: 241
Received 32 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2008GS
I would expect more MPG with non Ethanol because ethanol provides less energy than pure fuel when burned.
The amount of heat energy in gasoline as compared to ethanol on a volume to volume bases is well documented and supported with facts. Having said that, my turbo charged Audi S8 does not achieve the 3mpg increase I see with my normally aspirated vehicles.
Old 08-07-19, 10:03 PM
  #179  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 11,638
Received 186 Likes on 165 Posts
Default I see zero reason LX needs premium fuel.

Sorry if this has been covered before, and I did do a search.

I'm looking for one of these and know the gas mileage is bad.

Its V8 is identical to the Tundra's 5.7 which calls for regular. There are zero differences; the compression ratios are identical.

I don't mind driving a gas guzzler but I really don't want to waste $12-15 bucks a tank on high octane fuel if I don't need to.

Does anyone here run regular? I wonder what the service techs at the dealer would tell me. Or the Toyota dealer.
Old 08-07-19, 11:09 PM
  #180  
ClaytonW
Advanced
 
ClaytonW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NV
Posts: 528
Received 99 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

No!!!! Not again!!! :-D
LOL, this post will be very popular!
BTW, not important at this moment, but I think that you are right and regular is O.K. for your LX.
The following users liked this post:
glemmen1 (08-08-19)


Quick Reply: Premium fuel really needed?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:31 PM.