LS - 4th Gen (2007-2017) Discussion topics related to the current flagship models LS460, LS460L and LS600H

LS 3.5 V6 Vs LS 4.6 V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-19, 01:41 PM
  #1  
Richardgil
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
Richardgil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 95
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default LS 3.5 V6 Vs LS 4.6 V8

It is my opinion that there is virtually no difference in gas mileage in real world driving between the two engines. I think in EPA testing the turbo charged engines do better, I cannot tell you why. I am interested in the opinions of others on this.
Very disappointed that the V8 is no longer available in the LS.
Also interested to hear from anyone who has driven both for a comparison.
Old 07-05-19, 01:58 PM
  #2  
jkittlesen
Pole Position
 
jkittlesen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: TX
Posts: 245
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

FWIW, I am a V8 guy.
Twin turbo twin trouble
Old 07-05-19, 02:41 PM
  #3  
Tec80
Advanced
 
Tec80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: IL
Posts: 615
Received 126 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

The twin turbo 3.5L V6 actually has much better torque then the 1UR-FSE V8 below 4000RPM, but real-world fuel economy when loaded is worse because turbocharged engines use extra fuel enrichment to protect components (exhaust valves, cylinder heads, turbine impellers) from excessive temperatures. Where the V8 can run 11-12:1 Air-fuel ratio under load, the turbo engine has to dip down to 9:1. Ford's Ecoboost and the GM 2.7T truck engine also do this, and have worse fuel economy when towing than their NA engine counterparts. Hard acceleration is similar to towing, so when you drive an LS500 hard it will burn more fuel than the LS460.
The following 4 users liked this post by Tec80:
AJT123 (07-10-19), Johnny Rad (07-06-19), Richardgil (07-05-19), sha4000 (07-06-19)
Old 07-07-19, 01:15 PM
  #4  
lextout
Racer
 
lextout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: seattle,wa
Posts: 1,361
Received 47 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

those 4.6’s are in the tundras
Old 07-10-19, 08:42 AM
  #5  
roadfrog
Lexus Fanatic
 
roadfrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 5,371
Received 505 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

I was a staunch V8 guy, and to some respect...still am. That said, my 3.5 twin turbo in my SHO is killer. I still miss the V8 rumble, but the torque in my SHO's V6 is intoxicating. AND max torque comes in at only 1500 RPM...basically, just off-idle lol.... which is ridiculous. So far, reliability is perfect, but it's only been 16k miles. From what I've been reading, reliability is stellar in the Ford engine, so I would suspect Lexus to be even more so.
Old 07-10-19, 02:30 PM
  #6  
jainla
Intermediate
 
jainla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 256
Received 42 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Agreed with the above posts; TT engines do better in the EPA testing (which simulates driving like grandmama) but IRL the TT engines get pushed harder to keep up and more fuel is required to help keep temperatures down inside the combustion chambers. Honestly with the additional maintenance these engines require It's kind of a scam; i suspect the gross environmental impact is similar to an NA V8.

The UR is a peaky engine; i can remember driving a 460 and thinking for all the extra HP and torque it doesn't feel any stronger than my 430 around town. You really had to cane it and then it took off like a rocket. IMHO the TT V6 and the 4.6 feel a little soft off the line; once the boost comes on the TT feels stronger at low RPM. The 600 however is a different beast...
Old 07-10-19, 11:53 PM
  #7  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 11,632
Received 186 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jainla

The UR is a peaky engine; i can remember driving a 460 and thinking for all the extra HP and torque it doesn't feel any stronger than my 430 around town. You really had to cane it and then it took off like a rocket. IMHO the TT V6 and the 4.6 feel a little soft off the line; once the boost comes on the TT feels stronger at low RPM. The 600 however is a different beast...
460s I've driven actually felt weaker down low. Too many gears exacerbates it. Don't get me wrong though--wind the 4.6 out and a 430 will be eating dust. But the 4.3 old school V8 was the best LS motor....not trying to bait, just my humble opinion.
Old 07-11-19, 05:22 AM
  #8  
nsaldanh
Lead Lap
 
nsaldanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 611
Received 90 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

I moved to an LS500 in November from an LS460L. Here's my experience wrt mileage:

1. LS500 - lower mileage in city driving compared to LS460L 16.5 vs 17.7 driving on the same roads and routes.
2. LS500 - 36.5 MPG on highway at a steady 75 mph. I got about 29.5 on an LS460L on the same highway at the same speeds.
The following users liked this post:
Richardgil (07-11-19)
Old 07-11-19, 07:05 PM
  #9  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,557
Received 2,519 Likes on 1,817 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
460s I've driven actually felt weaker down low. Too many gears exacerbates it. Don't get me wrong though--wind the 4.6 out and a 430 will be eating dust. But the 4.3 old school V8 was the best LS motor....not trying to bait, just my humble opinion.
I would agree with that...
Old 07-11-19, 07:37 PM
  #10  
VanCityLS4
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
VanCityLS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: PacificNorthWest
Posts: 623
Received 75 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

The smooth operating 4.3 torque peaked at 320@3400 rpm. Lowish for a small V8. The 4.6 does 367@4100 rpm. The gearing makes you have to wind out the 1UR a bit. Seems that other F car owners also mention lack of torque down low and the need to get the revs up in the 5.0.

Having run full mandrel bent cat backs (deleted secondarys) on both motors I’d say the 1UR responds so much better.
Old 07-11-19, 07:52 PM
  #11  
jkittlesen
Pole Position
 
jkittlesen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: TX
Posts: 245
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Making this heavy 4 door luxury vehicle with a sport or F package is like lipstick on a pig....................WHY?

To me .................and only ME !

Is just stupid!

Let me also add putting 22 inch no sidewall tires on a 2 ton vehicle vehicle, silly!

JMHO.

Don't try to make it into a vehicle it was never intended to be!
The following users liked this post:
DrMikeinPD (07-12-19)
Old 07-11-19, 07:55 PM
  #12  
jkittlesen
Pole Position
 
jkittlesen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: TX
Posts: 245
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Oh by the way......................do what you want I approve, it's a free country............well it used to be!
Old 07-11-19, 07:58 PM
  #13  
VanCityLS4
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
VanCityLS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: PacificNorthWest
Posts: 623
Received 75 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

The same reasons why German flagships have those packages. Not once was 22” rims mentioned in this thread.

The F car Aisin 8 speed in any Sport or F Sport the difference maker.
Old 07-11-19, 08:01 PM
  #14  
jkittlesen
Pole Position
 
jkittlesen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: TX
Posts: 245
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VanCityLS4
The same reasons why German flagships have those packages. Not once was 22” rims mentioned in this thread.
Because the Germans do it means nothing!
I mentioned it!
Old 07-12-19, 05:37 AM
  #15  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,557
Received 2,519 Likes on 1,817 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jkittlesen
Making this heavy 4 door luxury vehicle with a sport or F package is like lipstick on a pig....................WHY?

To me .................and only ME !

Is just stupid!

Let me also add putting 22 inch no sidewall tires on a 2 ton vehicle vehicle, silly!

JMHO.

Don't try to make it into a vehicle it was never intended to be!
Because its a business and if customers will buy a certain package, thats what they should make. The F Sport package doesn't change the nature of the LS at all, it makes it look sportier and more aggressive, brings the engine note a little more into the realm of hearing and it makes it ride a touch sportier.

As for 22" wheels, if people like the looks why not? I wouldn't do it. What I would or wouldnt do has no bearing on what others may or may not do.


Quick Reply: LS 3.5 V6 Vs LS 4.6 V8



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:17 AM.