Notices
LS - 3rd Gen (2001-2006) Discussion topics related to the flagship Lexus LS430

Is the LS430 that unsafe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 05:20 PM
  #1  
lnguyenh's Avatar
lnguyenh
Thread Starter
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default Is the LS430 that unsafe?

I've just recently renew my auto insurance and I was shocked looking at the figures. To my surprise, the liability of the LS430 (bodily injury, property damage, uninsure motorists, etc) cost more than each of my MB (one of them is a roadster and the other is a AMG coupe both of which are much faster than the LS430). I knew the body Mercedes is better than that of the Lexus but I always thought 4 door sedan would be cheaper to insure ... until I looked at the figures. Perhaps Allstate knows something that I don't ... oh well.

Comprehensive and Collision on the LS430 were a tag cheaper than the MB though.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 06:40 PM
  #2  
Bon's Avatar
Bon
Advanced
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 704
Likes: 28
From: KC, MO
Default

Some years ago I used to trade to a new LS every 2-3 years. I was shocked when I saw the new insurance premiums after one of the trades. I checked around and found that it was just my insurance company that had jacked up the rates on the LS without explanation. I switched insurance companies and the problem was solved and hasn't returned yet.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 08:13 PM
  #3  
Jabberwock's Avatar
Jabberwock
CL Community Team
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,915
Likes: 227
From: Alabama
Default

Generally speaking liability insurance covers you for damage that the LS430 does to other people or things. It is a big heavy car so it can do quite a bit of damage relative to smaller lighter vehicles. I don't think higher than average liability cost would infer that the LS430 is unsafe for its occupants.
Most likely high liability may be an anomaly of your particular company - you might want to check around for better rates. The insurance on my LS430 is approx same as it was on my Acura RL (State Farm).
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 09:52 PM
  #4  
philboyj's Avatar
philboyj
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 30
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by lnguyenh
I've just recently renew my auto insurance and I was shocked looking at the figures. To my surprise, the liability of the LS430 (bodily injury, property damage, uninsure motorists, etc) cost more than each of my MB (one of them is a roadster and the other is a AMG coupe both of which are much faster than the LS430). I knew the body Mercedes is better than that of the Lexus but I always thought 4 door sedan would be cheaper to insure ... until I looked at the figures. Perhaps Allstate knows something that I don't ... oh well.

Comprehensive and Collision on the LS430 were a tag cheaper than the MB though.

For sure - its terribly unsafe for anyone who gets hit by the LS The other reason might be if you recently totaled your roadster or AMG - j/k...
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 10:39 PM
  #5  
vollandt's Avatar
vollandt
Driver
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: new york
Default

That's interesting. Before I purchased my latest LS, i ran different car scenarios though my my insurance broker. I didn't get the breakdown, but the overall insurance cost for the LS was a notch cheaper than a similar MB, Audi and Beemer.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 02:50 AM
  #6  
AlexusAnja's Avatar
AlexusAnja
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,189
Likes: 16
From: NY/NJ
Default

The cost of insurance is not just factored on safety, but on cost to repair if there's an accident, their historical data of likelihood of occurance based on age of driver, etc. So the LS might be expensive to your carrier because they've found that most 50+ drivers tend to get into accidents with them that require more payout.

I have full coverage on all my vehicles and my used '04 LS430 still costs more than my new '10 MDX by about 6%. Go figure...
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 05:41 AM
  #7  
lnguyenh's Avatar
lnguyenh
Thread Starter
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

I guess you missed my point.

AFAIK, liability is for other people/property if the LS430 hit. Generally speaking, why would my 500 HPs AMG (which is heavier than the LS430) cause less damage than the LS430? The same question applies to my SL500, it has less HPs than the CL55 but it is still faster than the LS430 (and certainly not any lighter). Shouldn't more HPs/faster cars cost more to insure? It's not making any sense to me.

Or is it because it's more likely for the LS430 to cause accident? I still don't see how ...

Originally Posted by phiboyj
For sure - its terribly unsafe for anyone who gets hit by the LS The other reason might be if you recently totaled your roadster or AMG - j/k...
if I recently had totalled the MBs, which I didn't, it should still be cheaper for the LS430 to liablly insure, right?

Originally Posted by AlexusAnja
So the LS might be expensive to your carrier because they've found that most 50+ drivers tend to get into accidents with them that require more payout.
Valid point ... so you are saying those "old farts" are ruining us? lol


Anyway, no more complains ... I am back to work ... thanks for listening to me venting ... cheers

Last edited by lnguyenh; Mar 15, 2011 at 05:47 AM. Reason: changing text
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 12:44 PM
  #8  
AlexusAnja's Avatar
AlexusAnja
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,189
Likes: 16
From: NY/NJ
Default Old farts

Originally Posted by lnguyenh

Valid point ... so you are saying those "old farts" are ruining us? lol


Anyway, no more complains ... I am back to work ... thanks for listening to me venting ... cheers
Yes, the "old farts" are ruining us... ha ha.

I'm sure HP is not that big a factor or else a Civic should only cost about $50 to insure.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 12:45 PM
  #9  
vollandt's Avatar
vollandt
Driver
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: new york
Default

Out of curiousity, I just went and re-checked the price to add a 2009 LS460 and a 2009 S550 to my policy. For liability only the price is identical. For full coverage the LS is ~10% cheaper than the S550.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 05:29 PM
  #10  
StanVanDam's Avatar
StanVanDam
Instructor
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 215
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Auto insurance companies look at your driving profile, which includes things like the make and model of car you drive, the rates of theft and cost/number of claims for that make/model, your age, your gender, where you live, rates of theft and number of claims for your area, how long you've held a license in that jurisdiction, the number of tickets and accidents on your record, where your car is parked in the daytime and at night, mileage used each year, factory and aftermarket anti-theft features, etc., and use all of that information to assess the risk of you making a claim in the future, which then determines your rates.

My insurance with State Farm is quite competitive compared to other insurers. I checked with every possible insurer available to me, and I check again every year. I think you just have to shop around more.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
airahcaz
LS - 3rd Gen (2001-2006)
42
Feb 3, 2010 07:52 PM
daryll40
LS - 3rd Gen (2001-2006)
16
Dec 24, 2003 06:42 PM
daddymalu
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
2
Sep 8, 2003 08:50 PM
caliz_finest
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
34
Oct 27, 2002 09:48 PM
1sickls430
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
5
Nov 12, 2001 05:33 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:26 AM.