Notices
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000) Discussion topics related to the 1990 - 2000 Lexus LS400

LS400 won't co-operate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2016 | 04:16 AM
  #1  
011011011's Avatar
011011011
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default LS400 won't co-operate

1998 LS400

CIR open relay won't open due to ECU failing to ground it.

Capacitors in ECU all replaced (with the exception of the unavailable BP 47uF). All of the removed caps in spec for capacitance but not tested for leakage etc.

OBD port is giving "bad connection or power" and won't communicate at all

If you hotwire the CIR relay the car will run but misfires on at least one cylinder.

Seriously losing patience with the thing now.

Any helpful suggestions greatly appreciated.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2016 | 09:08 AM
  #2  
aptoslexus's Avatar
aptoslexus
Advanced
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 613
Likes: 89
From: California
Default

Did you check the ground points? Saw a video recently of electronic gremlins. Turned out to be a loose ground connection to the body.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2016 | 07:49 AM
  #3  
Yamae's Avatar
Yamae
CL Community Team
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,178
Likes: 1,008
From: Japan
Default

Did you use a correct scanner specially designed for Toyota cars such as a S2000?
A 98 LS400 for non North American market is not OBD-II compatible although it has a same connector for it. The communication protocol is different from the OBD-II.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2016 | 08:09 AM
  #4  
Yamae's Avatar
Yamae
CL Community Team
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,178
Likes: 1,008
From: Japan
Default

Regarding the circuit opening relay inhibiting to supply the +12V, you must know that the ECU works so to avoid the serious engine damage when one of following conditions is detected.

1, No signal from the MAF for more than 3 seconds.
2, No signal from the crank position sensor for more than 5 seconds.
3, No signal from the cam position sensor for more than 5 seconds.
4, No IGF signal from the igniter for more than 3 seconds although the IGT signal is sent.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2016 | 01:19 PM
  #5  
011011011's Avatar
011011011
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Thanks Yamae, I'll check those sensors next. Much appreciated.

Ground points are good btw.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2016 | 04:29 PM
  #6  
Yamae's Avatar
Yamae
CL Community Team
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,178
Likes: 1,008
From: Japan
Default

Since you already have found misfires, the car might have some ignition problem.
The term "IGT" stands for "IGnition Trigger" and "IGF" "IGnition Feedback". The ECU is checking all 8 igniters sensing the IGF is properly coming back when the IGT is sent to the igniter. "Properly" here means that the phase and the voltage are within the range.

Check those first. An oscilloscope is the best tool to check those but you can somehow check the "IGF" signal level by a voltage meter comparing with others.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2016 | 05:12 AM
  #7  
011011011's Avatar
011011011
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

These are the resistance values for each of the 8 coils :

# pin 1-4, pin 1-2 (kOhm)

no1 74.8, 75.1
no2 72.0, 72.4
no3 68.4, 68.8
no4 75.1, 75.5
no5 72.3, 72.7
no6 73.4, 73.7
no7 69.7, 70.0
no8 73.6, 74.0

What are the min/max resistance values for these pencil coils please?

When number 3 is lifted from the spark plug it makes no difference to engine running so I'm suspecting that one is likely to be toast given its low resistance also.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2016 | 06:57 AM
  #8  
dicer's Avatar
dicer
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,525
Likes: 98
From: ca
Default

And unplugging a coil pack from the spark plug could ruin it if the engine is running as that high voltage has to go somewhere. And he said to check the IGF signal not the resistance values. And if it wasn't toast it maybe now.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2016 | 06:58 AM
  #9  
Yamae's Avatar
Yamae
CL Community Team
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,178
Likes: 1,008
From: Japan
Default

There's not only a coil but also transistors and resistors are there in the ignition module and the resistance check can check only a part of it and is mostly difficult to find out a failed one. The best way is to find out is to observe the IGF signal and IGT signal. But since you already tried to lift up the module and No.3 is the suspect. Swap it with some others and see any difference.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2016 | 08:43 AM
  #10  
011011011's Avatar
011011011
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Yamae
There's not only a coil but also transistors and resistors are there in the ignition module and the resistance check can check only a part of it and is mostly difficult to find out a failed one. The best way is to find out is to observe the IGF signal and IGT signal. But since you already tried to lift up the module and No.3 is the suspect. Swap it with some others and see any difference.
I'm sure it is, however,

1. I don't have an oscilloscope or a high freq multimeter.
2. If the car won't run (which it won't other than sporadically) I can't check for an IGF or IGT signal.

I have tried swapping it with another to see if the fault moves however it won't then start with it on the other bank. (Possibly because more than one is knackered)
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2016 | 08:44 AM
  #11  
011011011's Avatar
011011011
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by dicer
And unplugging a coil pack from the spark plug could ruin it if the engine is running as that high voltage has to go somewhere. And he said to check the IGF signal not the resistance values. And if it wasn't toast it maybe now.
I meant the multiplug from the coil, not the coil from the plug. So no harm done.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2016 | 03:05 PM
  #12  
dicer's Avatar
dicer
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,525
Likes: 98
From: ca
Default

Couldn't a person use a logic probe to check for the signal?
https://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&pag...Alogic%20probe
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2016 | 04:37 AM
  #13  
011011011's Avatar
011011011
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Given that 4 IGF returns are wired together how are you going to know which of the four is returning the wrong signal without an oscilloscope and concurrently monitoring the IGT signal?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2016 | 05:00 AM
  #14  
Yamae's Avatar
Yamae
CL Community Team
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,178
Likes: 1,008
From: Japan
Default

Originally Posted by 011011011
Given that 4 IGF returns are wired together how are you going to know which of the four is returning the wrong signal without an oscilloscope and concurrently monitoring the IGT signal?
Simply separate No.3, if that is the suspect and confirm.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2016 | 07:18 AM
  #15  
011011011's Avatar
011011011
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Yamae
Simply separate No.3, if that is the suspect and confirm.
Simply separate it where? Whilst still keeping it plugged in cos it won't run for more than 3 seconds without signal??
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:05 AM.