Performance Mods for 1st Gen LS
check this out is it any good? engine management http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/DIYPN...=p4506.c0.m245
check this out is it any good? engine management http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/DIYPN...=p4506.c0.m245
Does anyone know an inexpensive method to add negative camber to the front wheels without getting coilovers?
I'm running 19x9 +40 fronts and 19x9.5 +35 rears (I think those are the correct offsets, I may be mistaken) with 245/40/19 Michelin Pilot Sport A/S's all around.
I need about 1.5-3 degrees of negative camber to prevent my tires from hitting the fender in the front when hitting a hard bump. I was looking for camber plates but I dont know if they'd apply to a suspension set-up such as the LS400 has.
Sincerely,
Alex
I'm running 19x9 +40 fronts and 19x9.5 +35 rears (I think those are the correct offsets, I may be mistaken) with 245/40/19 Michelin Pilot Sport A/S's all around.
I need about 1.5-3 degrees of negative camber to prevent my tires from hitting the fender in the front when hitting a hard bump. I was looking for camber plates but I dont know if they'd apply to a suspension set-up such as the LS400 has.
Sincerely,
Alex
Colin
So other than coilovers and stb's, is there anything suspention wise for the first gen LS? To me suspention and handeling is #1, brakes is #2, HP is #3. I prefer to have the right suspention and brakes to help me get out of a sticky situation than to have the HP to put me in one.
So other than coilovers and stb's, is there anything suspention wise for the first gen LS? To me suspention and handeling is #1, brakes is #2, HP is #3. I prefer to have the right suspention and brakes to help me get out of a sticky situation than to have the HP to put me in one.
coilovers, sticky tires (18" for the 1LS), sway bar bushings, addco rear sway, roll center/SS kit to fix the bumpsteer for when you lower it, and gut the hell out of it, because the 1st gen weighs ~300-500lbs more than the 2nd gen.
Is UCF10 really that much heavier than UCF20?
ls400data.com shows '90 being 3,759 lb and '94 being 3,859 lb (driver side airbag, bigger brakes and wheels -- makes sense). Also shows '95/'96 as 3,650 lb and '99 3,890 lb. Looks like the '95/'96 are the lightest LSs, but others are equally piggy, it isn't quite a 300-500lb difference.
Looks like the final drive ratio went from 3.62:1 on '90-'97 models to 3.27:1 on '98+. If the '98 diff can be bolted up to earlier cars, that would be a fairly easy way to make them faster IMO.
http://www.ls400data.com/specs.php?year=1990
Stan
ls400data.com shows '90 being 3,759 lb and '94 being 3,859 lb (driver side airbag, bigger brakes and wheels -- makes sense). Also shows '95/'96 as 3,650 lb and '99 3,890 lb. Looks like the '95/'96 are the lightest LSs, but others are equally piggy, it isn't quite a 300-500lb difference.
Looks like the final drive ratio went from 3.62:1 on '90-'97 models to 3.27:1 on '98+. If the '98 diff can be bolted up to earlier cars, that would be a fairly easy way to make them faster IMO.
http://www.ls400data.com/specs.php?year=1990
Stan
Last edited by awdandrwd; Apr 9, 2012 at 02:02 PM.
Now that would be a nice and cheap improvement. It would prob improve the gas milage.
This is the thread you're looking for...post #43. He's in Thailand, and some modification is involved.
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/ls4...ine-bay-2.html
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/ls4...ine-bay-2.html
The supra is about 1000lbs lighter than the LS so I'm not too keen on using them, however the sc is very close in weight and there are nice coils available.
I love my '94, but it sure isn't a powerhouse. I feel a 5-speed manual transmission would wake it up somewhat, but it would be quite an undertaking (easier just to sell the car and buy a 6-speed 540i)
Stan
I read this thread and it got me thinking. If the front supra coil's are a direct bolt up and the rear just needs the lower perch welded on would coils for the first gen sc work with similar modification????
The supra is about 1000lbs lighter than the LS so I'm not too keen on using them, however the sc is very close in weight and there are nice coils available.
The supra is about 1000lbs lighter than the LS so I'm not too keen on using them, however the sc is very close in weight and there are nice coils available.
?
With a similar weighted car with similar travel and similar wheels I don't see how the valving would be off at all. The weight difference between SC and LS is like ~200lbs or a passenger. I certainly didn't see the op of that thread complaining about the ride on coils rated for ~1000lbs less...
Anyway it's an idea and forgive me if I'd trust slightly modded tein's or similar over some Meagan's or BC's. I would think this sort of thinking would add to the knowledge base around here.
So do you have an answer for my question? or are you just trolling?
Anyway it's an idea and forgive me if I'd trust slightly modded tein's or similar over some Meagan's or BC's. I would think this sort of thinking would add to the knowledge base around here.
So do you have an answer for my question? or are you just trolling?
With a similar weighted car with similar travel and similar wheels I don't see how the valving would be off at all. The weight difference between SC and LS is like ~200lbs or a passenger. I certainly didn't see the op of that thread complaining about the ride on coils rated for ~1000lbs less...
Anyway it's an idea and forgive me if I'd trust slightly modded tein's or similar over some Meagan's or BC's. I would think this sort of thinking would add to the knowledge base around here.
So do you have an answer for my question? or are you just trolling?
Anyway it's an idea and forgive me if I'd trust slightly modded tein's or similar over some Meagan's or BC's. I would think this sort of thinking would add to the knowledge base around here.
So do you have an answer for my question? or are you just trolling?
I actually had several conversations via PM with the member in question, years ago when he was still active. He wasn't going for ride comfort at all, nor did he ever track the car. when he did it there was simply no alternative as coiloers for the LS were simply not available both in his country, and in general at that time. (iirc the only option was tein for 2nd gen cars, and jdm market only specials for the LS). He did it out of necessity because it was better than running stock suspension in his case. If the Megans or BC-R or ANY of the other companies were making coils back then I can guarantee you he would have picked up a set and save himself the work.
Is UCF10 really that much heavier than UCF20?
ls400data.com shows '90 being 3,759 lb and '94 being 3,859 lb (driver side airbag, bigger brakes and wheels -- makes sense). Also shows '95/'96 as 3,650 lb and '99 3,890 lb. Looks like the '95/'96 are the lightest LSs, but others are equally piggy, it isn't quite a 300-500lb difference.
Looks like the final drive ratio went from 3.62:1 on '90-'97 models to 3.27:1 on '98+. If the '98 diff can be bolted up to earlier cars, that would be a fairly easy way to make them faster IMO.
http://www.ls400data.com/specs.php?year=1990
Stan
ls400data.com shows '90 being 3,759 lb and '94 being 3,859 lb (driver side airbag, bigger brakes and wheels -- makes sense). Also shows '95/'96 as 3,650 lb and '99 3,890 lb. Looks like the '95/'96 are the lightest LSs, but others are equally piggy, it isn't quite a 300-500lb difference.
Looks like the final drive ratio went from 3.62:1 on '90-'97 models to 3.27:1 on '98+. If the '98 diff can be bolted up to earlier cars, that would be a fairly easy way to make them faster IMO.
http://www.ls400data.com/specs.php?year=1990
Stan
you have the gearing down backwards. higher number=lower gear=better accel but lower highway mpg. lower number=higher gear=better highway mpg but lower accel. switching '98-00 cars to a '95-97 ring and pinion would result in faster acceleration.
the 1st gen LS and 1st gen SC have a weight difference of over 300lbs ('94 LS4 vs. SC3 auto) which is significant. also the proportion of that weight over the front vs. the rear wheels is quite different, which is also significant. the SC chassis has a difference of no more than ~110lbs between engine/trans combinations hence the lack of needing engine-specific coilover valving.
I actually had several conversations via PM with the member in question, years ago when he was still active. He wasn't going for ride comfort at all, nor did he ever track the car. when he did it there was simply no alternative as coiloers for the LS were simply not available both in his country, and in general at that time. (iirc the only option was tein for 2nd gen cars, and jdm market only specials for the LS). He did it out of necessity because it was better than running stock suspension in his case. If the Megans or BC-R or ANY of the other companies were making coils back then I can guarantee you he would have picked up a set and save himself the work.
I actually had several conversations via PM with the member in question, years ago when he was still active. He wasn't going for ride comfort at all, nor did he ever track the car. when he did it there was simply no alternative as coiloers for the LS were simply not available both in his country, and in general at that time. (iirc the only option was tein for 2nd gen cars, and jdm market only specials for the LS). He did it out of necessity because it was better than running stock suspension in his case. If the Megans or BC-R or ANY of the other companies were making coils back then I can guarantee you he would have picked up a set and save himself the work.
Some ppl put more weight into a car with a system and some rediculous rims and the cheapies seem to be holding up even they weren't valved for the extra sub weight.








