Notices
LFA Model (2012)

Would you buy a LFA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 05:51 AM
  #46  
<VENOM>'s Avatar
<VENOM>
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: NYC/ATL
Default

I thought it was bad when I took my car to Nissan and the shop had a GTR in it surrounded by several Sentra's and Cube's, guess it was only a matter of time before a Lexus owner had the same problem

I want an LFA, but would it have been so bad if Lexus made the body out of aluminum and sold the car for half the price, then made the CF model later on.

I wonder how much body work is gonna cost with this thing
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 06:33 AM
  #47  
The G Man's Avatar
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,809
Likes: 143
From: MA
Default

VENOM, I was just thing the same thing. I wonder did Lexus make too big of a jump with the LFA. The next sport model down is the IS-F or the GS-h. Thats quite a jump going from a $60K or $70K car to a almost $400K car. As an old saying goes, one must learn to walk before they learn to run.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 06:54 AM
  #48  
jaseman's Avatar
jaseman
Pole Position
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
if I could own only one supercar, I would
Would what? Only own one supercar...
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 07:05 AM
  #49  
Dave600hL's Avatar
Dave600hL
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,448
Likes: 2
From: Japan
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
VENOM, I was just thing the same thing. I wonder did Lexus make too big of a jump with the LFA. The next sport model down is the IS-F or the GS-h. Thats quite a jump going from a $60K or $70K car to a almost $400K car. As an old saying goes, one must learn to walk before they learn to run.
Oh, I think they can run and they have the technology in the LFA to prove that. Only a few cars that have been released with this much new tech ect in their day and age that made this much of a stir in the industry.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 07:28 AM
  #50  
RX469's Avatar
RX469
Pole Position
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 73
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by DASHOCKER
I'll take this prancing horse after selling my house. The Ferrari cache & pedigree is worth every penny.

I agree with this ^^
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 07:42 AM
  #51  
jaseman's Avatar
jaseman
Pole Position
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

Would I own one, if I could? Maybe, maybe not. Would really depend on the circumstances.

If I could only ever have one $400k car in my lifetime? No, the LFA wouldn't even be on my radar. Just doesn't have the emotional appeal for me. I want a raw, visceral, animal of a car. Something 911 based, a Ford GT, or other hairy-chested gorilla of a car. Ideally though, for $400k, I'd go find an original 427 Cobra that was set up for vintage racing, and have the time of my life in it.

Now if, on the other hand, I was continually making big money, instead of winning the lottery, sure, I'd own one. Because I know that, even if I wasn't a collector per se', I'd still be buying, selling, or trading off the car every few years. Run a Ferrari for 2 or 3 years, trade it for a Spyker, then an LFA, then a Porsche, and on and on. It's what I do now with motorcycles and even my daily drivers. So I can't imagine I wouldn't do it with supercars if I was that wealthy. I could always say "ya, I had an LFA for a while, but now I have a..." and have some interesting story behind it.


For those that say Lexus has no pedigree, I pose a little counter-point. Toyota has a long racing history. Be it factory teams in F1, CART, and IRL, or offering manufacturers support to WRC, NASCAR, the Atlantic series, or various off-road series. So the company knows a little bit about building performance vehicles. Have they ever built a true, GT car for the road before? No, but neither had McLaren before the F1, Ford before the original GT-40 (though it was designed primarily for racing), or even (arguably) Dodge before the Viper.

So I would consider Lexus to have the heritage behind them. Just not the traditional one we equate with Ferrari, Porsche, or Lamborghini.

Just my 2 cents though.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 11:07 AM
  #52  
Oleg400's Avatar
Oleg400
Advanced
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 675
Likes: 15
From: Corrupt IL
Default

Id go and find a lightly used carrera GT
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #53  
xioix's Avatar
xioix
Racer
CL Folding 200,000
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: so. cal
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
Does that mean the median liquid net worth of people buying $20k+ cars is $2.5 million. I think its time for me to down grade my car
Fun fact, most millionaires in the US drive a Camry
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 12:32 PM
  #54  
TwiBlueG35's Avatar
TwiBlueG35
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Probably not. If I have $400k to spend on cars then I have to spit the money into several cars instead of one. If I could only spend that much money on one single car, then it might be Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #55  
TwiBlueG35's Avatar
TwiBlueG35
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
Does that mean the median liquid net worth of people buying $20k+ cars is $2.5 million. I think its time for me to down grade my car
I can't afford driving anything based on that logic.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 03:37 PM
  #56  
SLegacy99's Avatar
SLegacy99
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by xioix
Fun fact, most millionaires in the US drive a Camry
I think Bill Gates drove a Windstar for a while there.


The owner of my company drove his Lambo to one of the stores. Doesn't look good when you have hundreds of employees at that location starting at min. wage and there you are in your 6 figure automobile.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 04:39 PM
  #57  
Faymester's Avatar
Faymester
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,468
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

So many variables with this one. Has Lexus invited me to buy one? How much of an animal is the car? Do I like the ergonomics inside?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 06:19 PM
  #58  
I8ABMR's Avatar
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 22,608
Likes: 105
From: Waiting for next track day
Default

Originally Posted by Dave600hL
Oh, I think they can run and they have the technology in the LFA to prove that. Only a few cars that have been released with this much new tech ect in their day and age that made this much of a stir in the industry.
yah but those cars were all from manufacturers that have actually designed a supercar before. Its like buying a million dollar home with an agent who is doing his very best on his first sale. The effort is appreciated but there will always be something that will happen that is non ideal. To us the buyer we get screwed but the agent gets to "learn" . Ferrari can easily ask for 400k for a car because we all know they know what they are doing . Its not their first shot. For Lexus to ask 400k for this car is just risky imho......for the buyer and for Lexus to be honest.


Also for all of those who will say that the car has the same type of chassis design elements as an Ferrari Enzo , and the Ferrari cost 650k when it was released. Well remember that the Ferrari Enzo was first released the better part of a decade ago when carbon fiber technology was way more expensive than it is today ( although its still extremely expensive ). In the end, as a fan of Japanese cars I am very proud of the LF-A but they are a bit high to think that people will be lining up to drop 400K on a first generation car from a manufacturer that builds solid luxury cars in the 35-80k range. Kind of like the ISF. The car is solid but most are still going to want the real deal M3 if they are going to shell out that kind of money. M3 is in its like 6th or 5th generation. They learn a thing or two when they do this

Last edited by I8ABMR; Nov 19, 2009 at 06:23 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 07:07 PM
  #59  
Ice350's Avatar
Ice350
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,349
Likes: 7
From: Florida
Default

I may agree that Ferrari has been able to get away with charging home prices for their cars....which are very sweet btw but I do not believe their cars are superior to Lexus. They perform much better than anything Lexus has made to date but superior, no way. I've been inside several Ferrari and i don't feel their interiors are better nor the build quality. In fact, imo Lexus is better. Now that the LFA is nearly here, the performance equalizer is born. History and pedigree...smedibee. Ferrari's are no where near as reliable and drivable as a Lexus. Now we will have a reliable, drivable supercar built from the history of Toyota racing and Lexus luxury.
No car is worth 400K to me but if a Ferrari can command that price, so can a Lexus supercar.

I do believe Lexus should have started out cheaper though but too much money was spent developing this car. Plus, many people believe that if something is cheaper, it ain't worth nothing. Psychology is also at play here.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 07:18 PM
  #60  
xioix's Avatar
xioix
Racer
CL Folding 200,000
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: so. cal
Default

Originally Posted by I8ABMR
yah but those cars were all from manufacturers that have actually designed a supercar before. Its like buying a million dollar home with an agent who is doing his very best on his first sale. The effort is appreciated but there will always be something that will happen that is non ideal. To us the buyer we get screwed but the agent gets to "learn" . Ferrari can easily ask for 400k for a car because we all know they know what they are doing . Its not their first shot. For Lexus to ask 400k for this car is just risky imho......for the buyer and for Lexus to be honest.


Also for all of those who will say that the car has the same type of chassis design elements as an Ferrari Enzo , and the Ferrari cost 650k when it was released. Well remember that the Ferrari Enzo was first released the better part of a decade ago when carbon fiber technology was way more expensive than it is today ( although its still extremely expensive ). In the end, as a fan of Japanese cars I am very proud of the LF-A but they are a bit high to think that people will be lining up to drop 400K on a first generation car from a manufacturer that builds solid luxury cars in the 35-80k range. Kind of like the ISF. The car is solid but most are still going to want the real deal M3 if they are going to shell out that kind of money. M3 is in its like 6th or 5th generation. They learn a thing or two when they do this
Well there are two types of people in this situation, the people who will follow the trend and just buy the typical car in this category (Ferrari, Lambo, Aston), or start a new trend and buy a car from a brand that hasn't done this before (Lexus, Koenigsegg, Gumpert)
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:06 AM.